/root/.sdkman/candidates/java/21.0.5-tem/bin/java -Xmx8000000000 -Xss4m -jar ./plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.6.800.v20240513-1750.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata ./data -s ../benchexec/../../../trunk/examples/settings/gemcutter/NewStatesSleepPersistentFixedOrder.epf --traceabstraction.dfs.order.used.in.por LOOP_LOCKSTEP --traceabstraction.commutativity.condition.synthesis NECESSARY_AND_SUFFICIENT -tc ../benchexec/../../../trunk/examples/toolchains/AutomizerCInline.xml -i ../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/pthread-ext/04_incdec_cas.i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is Ultimate 0.3.0-wip.dk.conditional-comm-aee53f6 [2024-11-15 21:32:19,788 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2024-11-15 21:32:19,866 INFO L114 SettingsManager]: Loading settings from /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/../benchexec/../../../trunk/examples/settings/gemcutter/NewStatesSleepPersistentFixedOrder.epf [2024-11-15 21:32:19,870 WARN L101 SettingsManager]: Preference file contains the following unknown settings: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,870 WARN L103 SettingsManager]: * de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.core.Log level for class [2024-11-15 21:32:19,887 INFO L130 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,888 INFO L151 SettingsManager]: Preferences of UltimateCore differ from their defaults: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,888 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Log level for class=de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher=ERROR; [2024-11-15 21:32:19,888 INFO L151 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Boogie Procedure Inliner differ from their defaults: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,888 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Ignore calls to procedures called more than once=ONLY_FOR_SEQUENTIAL_PROGRAMS [2024-11-15 21:32:19,888 INFO L151 SettingsManager]: Preferences of BlockEncodingV2 differ from their defaults: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,888 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Create parallel compositions if possible=false [2024-11-15 21:32:19,888 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Use SBE=true [2024-11-15 21:32:19,889 INFO L151 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,889 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2024-11-15 21:32:19,889 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2024-11-15 21:32:19,889 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2024-11-15 21:32:19,889 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L151 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Size of a code block=SequenceOfStatements [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * To the following directory=./dump/ [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2024-11-15 21:32:19,891 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L151 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopHeads [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Apply one-shot large block encoding in concurrent analysis=false [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Automaton type used in concurrency analysis=PARTIAL_ORDER_FA [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * CEGAR restart behaviour=ONE_CEGAR_PER_THREAD_INSTANCE [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * Partial Order Reduction in concurrent analysis=PERSISTENT_SLEEP_NEW_STATES_FIXEDORDER [2024-11-15 21:32:19,892 INFO L153 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: DFS Order used in POR -> LOOP_LOCKSTEP Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: Commutativity condition synthesis -> NECESSARY_AND_SUFFICIENT [2024-11-15 21:32:20,183 INFO L75 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2024-11-15 21:32:20,190 INFO L261 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2024-11-15 21:32:20,192 INFO L217 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2024-11-15 21:32:20,193 INFO L270 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2024-11-15 21:32:20,195 INFO L274 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2024-11-15 21:32:20,197 INFO L431 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/pthread-ext/04_incdec_cas.i [2024-11-15 21:32:21,602 INFO L533 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at NULL [2024-11-15 21:32:21,904 INFO L384 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2024-11-15 21:32:21,907 INFO L180 CDTParser]: Scanning /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/trunk/examples/svcomp/pthread-ext/04_incdec_cas.i [2024-11-15 21:32:21,923 INFO L427 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/data/351ce78c9/f575ad30e8bb4483bc35e327033cc8f7/FLAG0d5b6581c [2024-11-15 21:32:21,942 INFO L435 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/data/351ce78c9/f575ad30e8bb4483bc35e327033cc8f7 [2024-11-15 21:32:21,945 INFO L299 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2024-11-15 21:32:21,947 INFO L133 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 5 elements. [2024-11-15 21:32:21,948 INFO L112 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:21,948 INFO L270 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2024-11-15 21:32:21,953 INFO L274 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2024-11-15 21:32:21,954 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 15.11 09:32:21" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:21,955 INFO L204 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@7d5b330b and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:21, skipping insertion in model container [2024-11-15 21:32:21,955 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 15.11 09:32:21" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:21,989 INFO L175 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2024-11-15 21:32:22,223 WARN L250 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/trunk/examples/svcomp/pthread-ext/04_incdec_cas.i[30369,30382] [2024-11-15 21:32:22,235 WARN L250 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/trunk/examples/svcomp/pthread-ext/04_incdec_cas.i[30869,30882] [2024-11-15 21:32:22,246 INFO L210 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2024-11-15 21:32:22,253 INFO L200 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2024-11-15 21:32:22,292 WARN L250 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/trunk/examples/svcomp/pthread-ext/04_incdec_cas.i[30369,30382] [2024-11-15 21:32:22,295 WARN L250 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/trunk/examples/svcomp/pthread-ext/04_incdec_cas.i[30869,30882] [2024-11-15 21:32:22,298 INFO L210 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2024-11-15 21:32:22,330 INFO L204 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2024-11-15 21:32:22,330 INFO L201 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22 WrapperNode [2024-11-15 21:32:22,330 INFO L131 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:22,332 INFO L112 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:22,333 INFO L270 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Procedure Inliner... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,333 INFO L274 PluginConnector]: Boogie Procedure Inliner initialized [2024-11-15 21:32:22,338 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,353 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer Inliner from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,380 INFO L138 Inliner]: procedures = 174, calls = 44, calls flagged for inlining = 8, calls inlined = 8, statements flattened = 157 [2024-11-15 21:32:22,382 INFO L131 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:22,382 INFO L112 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:22,383 INFO L270 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,383 INFO L274 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2024-11-15 21:32:22,388 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,388 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,392 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,392 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,401 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,407 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,408 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer LTLStepAnnotator from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,409 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,411 INFO L131 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:22,414 INFO L112 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:22,414 INFO L270 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,414 INFO L274 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2024-11-15 21:32:22,415 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (1/1) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:22,424 INFO L173 SolverBuilder]: Constructing external solver with command: z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2024-11-15 21:32:22,436 INFO L189 MonitoredProcess]: No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 [2024-11-15 21:32:22,449 INFO L229 MonitoredProcess]: Starting monitored process 1 with /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) [2024-11-15 21:32:22,457 INFO L327 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (1)] Waiting until timeout for monitored process [2024-11-15 21:32:22,472 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~int [2024-11-15 21:32:22,472 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure thr1 [2024-11-15 21:32:22,472 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure thr1 [2024-11-15 21:32:22,472 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2024-11-15 21:32:22,472 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_begin [2024-11-15 21:32:22,472 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocInit [2024-11-15 21:32:22,472 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2024-11-15 21:32:22,473 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2024-11-15 21:32:22,473 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2024-11-15 21:32:22,473 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_end [2024-11-15 21:32:22,473 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2024-11-15 21:32:22,473 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2024-11-15 21:32:22,474 WARN L207 CfgBuilder]: User set CodeBlockSize to SequenceOfStatements but program contains fork statements. Overwriting the user preferences and setting CodeBlockSize to OneNontrivialStatement. [2024-11-15 21:32:22,587 INFO L238 CfgBuilder]: Building ICFG [2024-11-15 21:32:22,588 INFO L264 CfgBuilder]: Building CFG for each procedure with an implementation [2024-11-15 21:32:22,881 INFO L283 CfgBuilder]: Omitted future-live optimization because the input is a concurrent program. [2024-11-15 21:32:22,881 INFO L287 CfgBuilder]: Performing block encoding [2024-11-15 21:32:23,087 INFO L311 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2024-11-15 21:32:23,087 INFO L316 CfgBuilder]: Removed 3 assume(true) statements. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,087 INFO L201 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 15.11 09:32:23 BoogieIcfgContainer [2024-11-15 21:32:23,087 INFO L131 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:23,092 INFO L112 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:32:23,092 INFO L270 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2024-11-15 21:32:23,097 INFO L274 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2024-11-15 21:32:23,097 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 15.11 09:32:21" (1/3) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:23,097 INFO L204 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@788dce45 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 15.11 09:32:23, skipping insertion in model container [2024-11-15 21:32:23,098 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 09:32:22" (2/3) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:23,098 INFO L204 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@788dce45 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 15.11 09:32:23, skipping insertion in model container [2024-11-15 21:32:23,098 INFO L184 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 15.11 09:32:23" (3/3) ... [2024-11-15 21:32:23,099 INFO L112 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG 04_incdec_cas.i [2024-11-15 21:32:23,111 INFO L217 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:LoopHeads NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2024-11-15 21:32:23,112 INFO L154 ceAbstractionStarter]: Applying trace abstraction to ICFG 04_incdec_cas.i that has 2 procedures, 86 locations, 1 initial locations, 3 loop locations, and 2 error locations. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,112 INFO L492 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 1 thread instances. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,194 INFO L143 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 0 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,243 INFO L126 denceProviderFactory]: Independence Relation #1: [IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=true, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:23,244 INFO L173 SolverBuilder]: Constructing external solver with command: z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 [2024-11-15 21:32:23,244 INFO L189 MonitoredProcess]: No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 [2024-11-15 21:32:23,248 INFO L229 MonitoredProcess]: Starting monitored process 2 with /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) [2024-11-15 21:32:23,249 INFO L327 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 (2)] Waiting until timeout for monitored process [2024-11-15 21:32:23,338 INFO L181 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Running PartialOrderCegarLoop with 1 independence relations. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,352 INFO L332 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0 == of CEGAR loop == thr1Thread1of1ForFork0 ======== [2024-11-15 21:32:23,358 INFO L333 AbstractCegarLoop]: Settings: SEPARATE_VIOLATION_CHECK=true, mInterprocedural=true, mMaxIterations=1000000, mWatchIteration=1000000, mArtifact=RCFG, mInterpolation=FPandBP, mInterpolantAutomaton=STRAIGHT_LINE, mDumpAutomata=false, mAutomataFormat=ATS_NUMERATE, mDumpPath=., mDeterminiation=PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION, mMinimize=MINIMIZE_SEVPA, mAutomataTypeConcurrency=PARTIAL_ORDER_FA, mHoareTripleChecks=INCREMENTAL, mHoareAnnotationPositions=LoopHeads, mDumpOnlyReuseAutomata=false, mLimitTraceHistogram=0, mErrorLocTimeLimit=0, mLimitPathProgramCount=0, mCollectInterpolantStatistics=true, mHeuristicEmptinessCheck=false, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristic=ZERO, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristicRandomSeed=1337, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckSmtFeatureScoringMethod=DAGSIZE, mSMTFeatureExtraction=false, mSMTFeatureExtractionDumpPath=., mOverrideInterpolantAutomaton=false, mMcrInterpolantMethod=WP, mPorIndependenceSettings=[Lde.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.tracecheckerutils.partialorder.independence.IndependenceSettings;@2f928100, mLbeIndependenceSettings=[IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=false, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:23,359 INFO L334 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 2 error locations. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,647 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:23,647 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,647 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 784010266, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:23,647 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:23,647 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,654 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:23,654 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1803849624, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:23,661 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:23,661 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1564080548] [2024-11-15 21:32:23,662 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:23,662 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:23,777 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:23,859 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,860 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:23,860 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1564080548] [2024-11-15 21:32:23,861 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1564080548] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:23,861 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,861 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2024-11-15 21:32:23,862 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [32922565] [2024-11-15 21:32:23,863 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:23,870 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 2 states [2024-11-15 21:32:23,870 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:23,885 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 2 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,885 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=1, Invalid=1, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=2 [2024-11-15 21:32:23,886 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:23,886 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:23,887 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 2 states, 2 states have (on average 19.0) internal successors, (38), 2 states have internal predecessors, (38), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:23,887 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:24,155 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:24,155 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable0 [2024-11-15 21:32:24,156 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:24,156 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:24,156 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 1247898467, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:24,156 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:24,156 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:24,156 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:24,157 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -769153340, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:24,157 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:24,157 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1639010527] [2024-11-15 21:32:24,157 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:24,157 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:24,247 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:25,324 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,325 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:25,325 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1639010527] [2024-11-15 21:32:25,325 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1639010527] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:25,325 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,325 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [10] imperfect sequences [] total 10 [2024-11-15 21:32:25,325 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1230635137] [2024-11-15 21:32:25,325 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:25,326 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 11 states [2024-11-15 21:32:25,326 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:25,327 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,328 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=25, Invalid=85, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2024-11-15 21:32:25,328 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,328 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:25,329 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 11 states, 10 states have (on average 4.4) internal successors, (44), 11 states have internal predecessors, (44), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:25,329 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,329 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,709 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,711 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,711 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable1 [2024-11-15 21:32:25,711 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:25,711 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,711 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 1754147057, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:25,711 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:25,711 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:25,712 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:25,712 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -887167223, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:25,712 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:25,713 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1778089446] [2024-11-15 21:32:25,713 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:25,713 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:25,783 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:26,797 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1778089446] [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1778089446] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [13] imperfect sequences [] total 13 [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [591783482] [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 14 states [2024-11-15 21:32:26,798 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:26,799 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 14 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:26,799 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=35, Invalid=147, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=182 [2024-11-15 21:32:26,799 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:26,799 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:26,800 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 14 states, 13 states have (on average 4.3076923076923075) internal successors, (56), 14 states have internal predecessors, (56), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:26,800 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:26,800 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:26,800 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,500 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,501 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,501 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 12 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,501 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable2 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,501 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === Targeting thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:27,501 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,501 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 761884846, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,501 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:27,502 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,502 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:27,502 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 590452487, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:27,502 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:27,502 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [647447609] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,502 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:27,502 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:27,520 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:27,592 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [647447609] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [647447609] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1102745727] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 4 states [2024-11-15 21:32:27,593 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 4 states, 4 states have (on average 11.0) internal successors, (44), 4 states have internal predecessors, (44), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 12 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,594 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,712 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,712 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,712 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 12 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,714 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,717 INFO L782 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result SAFE for location thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION (1 of 2 remaining) [2024-11-15 21:32:27,717 INFO L782 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result SAFE for location thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION (0 of 2 remaining) [2024-11-15 21:32:27,717 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable3 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,721 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: Path program histogram: [1, 1, 1, 1] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,723 INFO L320 ceAbstractionStarter]: Result for error location thr1Thread1of1ForFork0 was SAFE,SAFE (1/2) [2024-11-15 21:32:27,727 INFO L126 denceProviderFactory]: Independence Relation #1: [IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=true, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,727 INFO L181 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Running PartialOrderCegarLoop with 1 independence relations. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,728 INFO L332 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0 == of CEGAR loop == ULTIMATE.start ======== [2024-11-15 21:32:27,728 INFO L333 AbstractCegarLoop]: Settings: SEPARATE_VIOLATION_CHECK=true, mInterprocedural=true, mMaxIterations=1000000, mWatchIteration=1000000, mArtifact=RCFG, mInterpolation=FPandBP, mInterpolantAutomaton=STRAIGHT_LINE, mDumpAutomata=false, mAutomataFormat=ATS_NUMERATE, mDumpPath=., mDeterminiation=PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION, mMinimize=MINIMIZE_SEVPA, mAutomataTypeConcurrency=PARTIAL_ORDER_FA, mHoareTripleChecks=INCREMENTAL, mHoareAnnotationPositions=LoopHeads, mDumpOnlyReuseAutomata=false, mLimitTraceHistogram=0, mErrorLocTimeLimit=0, mLimitPathProgramCount=0, mCollectInterpolantStatistics=true, mHeuristicEmptinessCheck=false, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristic=ZERO, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristicRandomSeed=1337, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckSmtFeatureScoringMethod=DAGSIZE, mSMTFeatureExtraction=false, mSMTFeatureExtractionDumpPath=., mOverrideInterpolantAutomaton=false, mMcrInterpolantMethod=WP, mPorIndependenceSettings=[Lde.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.tracecheckerutils.partialorder.independence.IndependenceSettings;@2f928100, mLbeIndependenceSettings=[IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=false, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,728 INFO L334 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 1 error locations. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,740 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:27,740 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,740 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 944948516, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,740 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:27,740 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,741 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:27,741 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1180345231, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:27,741 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:27,741 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1331583417] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,741 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:27,741 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:27,750 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:27,760 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,760 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:27,760 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1331583417] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,760 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1331583417] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:27,760 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,760 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,761 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [546497596] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,761 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:27,761 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 2 states [2024-11-15 21:32:27,761 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:27,762 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 2 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,762 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=1, Invalid=1, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=2 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,762 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,762 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:27,762 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 2 states, 2 states have (on average 21.5) internal successors, (43), 2 states have internal predecessors, (43), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:27,762 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,774 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,774 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable4 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,774 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:27,774 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,774 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 2137940910, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -114004228, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1844498677] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:27,775 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:27,787 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:27,833 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,833 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:27,833 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1844498677] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,833 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1844498677] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:27,833 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,833 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,833 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [911674179] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,834 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:27,834 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 4 states [2024-11-15 21:32:27,834 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:27,834 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,835 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,835 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,835 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:27,835 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 4 states, 4 states have (on average 12.75) internal successors, (51), 4 states have internal predecessors, (51), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:27,835 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,835 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,882 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,882 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,882 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable5 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,882 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash -1978105902, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 404957155, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1534806922] [2024-11-15 21:32:27,883 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:27,884 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:27,908 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:28,469 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,470 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:28,470 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1534806922] [2024-11-15 21:32:28,470 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1534806922] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:28,470 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,470 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [11] imperfect sequences [] total 11 [2024-11-15 21:32:28,470 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1062742267] [2024-11-15 21:32:28,470 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:28,471 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 11 states [2024-11-15 21:32:28,471 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:28,471 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,471 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=25, Invalid=85, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2024-11-15 21:32:28,471 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,471 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:28,471 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 11 states, 11 states have (on average 4.454545454545454) internal successors, (49), 11 states have internal predecessors, (49), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:28,472 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,472 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,472 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,633 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,634 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable6 [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 337763603, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,635 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:28,636 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1411724081, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:28,636 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:28,636 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [662173304] [2024-11-15 21:32:28,636 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:28,636 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:28,659 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is sat [2024-11-15 21:32:28,659 INFO L357 TraceCheck]: Trace is feasible, we will do another trace check, this time with branch encoders. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,679 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is sat [2024-11-15 21:32:28,707 INFO L130 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found a feasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:28,707 INFO L340 BasicCegarLoop]: Counterexample is feasible [2024-11-15 21:32:28,708 INFO L782 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result UNSAFE for location ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES (0 of 1 remaining) [2024-11-15 21:32:28,708 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable7 [2024-11-15 21:32:28,709 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: Path program histogram: [1, 1, 1, 1] [2024-11-15 21:32:28,709 INFO L320 ceAbstractionStarter]: Result for error location ULTIMATE.start was UNSAFE (2/2) [2024-11-15 21:32:28,710 WARN L247 ceAbstractionStarter]: 1 thread instances were not sufficient, I will increase this number and restart the analysis [2024-11-15 21:32:28,710 INFO L492 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 2 thread instances. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,771 INFO L143 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 0 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,776 INFO L126 denceProviderFactory]: Independence Relation #1: [IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=true, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:28,792 INFO L181 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Running PartialOrderCegarLoop with 1 independence relations. [2024-11-15 21:32:28,793 INFO L332 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0 == of CEGAR loop == ULTIMATE.start ======== [2024-11-15 21:32:28,793 INFO L333 AbstractCegarLoop]: Settings: SEPARATE_VIOLATION_CHECK=true, mInterprocedural=true, mMaxIterations=1000000, mWatchIteration=1000000, mArtifact=RCFG, mInterpolation=FPandBP, mInterpolantAutomaton=STRAIGHT_LINE, mDumpAutomata=false, mAutomataFormat=ATS_NUMERATE, mDumpPath=., mDeterminiation=PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION, mMinimize=MINIMIZE_SEVPA, mAutomataTypeConcurrency=PARTIAL_ORDER_FA, mHoareTripleChecks=INCREMENTAL, mHoareAnnotationPositions=LoopHeads, mDumpOnlyReuseAutomata=false, mLimitTraceHistogram=0, mErrorLocTimeLimit=0, mLimitPathProgramCount=0, mCollectInterpolantStatistics=true, mHeuristicEmptinessCheck=false, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristic=ZERO, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristicRandomSeed=1337, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckSmtFeatureScoringMethod=DAGSIZE, mSMTFeatureExtraction=false, mSMTFeatureExtractionDumpPath=., mOverrideInterpolantAutomaton=false, mMcrInterpolantMethod=WP, mPorIndependenceSettings=[Lde.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.tracecheckerutils.partialorder.independence.IndependenceSettings;@2f928100, mLbeIndependenceSettings=[IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=false, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:28,793 INFO L334 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 1 error locations. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,179 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:29,179 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 401780612, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1438054457, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [424555378] [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:29,180 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:29,192 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:29,203 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [424555378] [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [424555378] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [788621126] [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 2 states [2024-11-15 21:32:29,204 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:29,205 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 2 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,205 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=1, Invalid=1, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=2 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,205 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,205 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:29,205 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 2 states, 2 states have (on average 29.5) internal successors, (59), 2 states have internal predecessors, (59), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:29,205 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,390 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,390 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable8 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,390 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:29,390 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,390 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 104010454, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1868349279, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1755167080] [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:29,391 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:29,402 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:29,457 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,457 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:29,457 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1755167080] [2024-11-15 21:32:29,457 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1755167080] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:29,457 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,458 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,458 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [840188051] [2024-11-15 21:32:29,458 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:29,458 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 4 states [2024-11-15 21:32:29,458 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:29,459 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,459 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,459 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,459 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:29,459 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 4 states, 4 states have (on average 18.75) internal successors, (75), 4 states have internal predecessors, (75), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:29,459 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,459 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,634 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,634 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable9 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash -429643342, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 664259240, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:29,635 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:29,636 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1884137862] [2024-11-15 21:32:29,636 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:29,636 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:29,659 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:30,123 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,123 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:30,123 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1884137862] [2024-11-15 21:32:30,123 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1884137862] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:30,123 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,124 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [13] imperfect sequences [] total 13 [2024-11-15 21:32:30,124 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1663685054] [2024-11-15 21:32:30,124 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:30,124 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 13 states [2024-11-15 21:32:30,124 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 13 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=30, Invalid=126, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 13 states, 13 states have (on average 5.923076923076923) internal successors, (77), 13 states have internal predecessors, (77), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,125 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,550 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,550 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,550 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,551 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable10 [2024-11-15 21:32:30,551 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:30,551 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,551 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash -1697123979, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:30,551 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:30,551 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:30,552 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:30,552 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 861359227, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:30,552 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:30,552 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2064318578] [2024-11-15 21:32:30,554 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:30,554 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:30,611 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:32,176 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,177 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:32,177 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2064318578] [2024-11-15 21:32:32,177 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2064318578] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:32,177 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,177 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [22] imperfect sequences [] total 22 [2024-11-15 21:32:32,177 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [455813056] [2024-11-15 21:32:32,177 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:32,178 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 22 states [2024-11-15 21:32:32,178 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:32,178 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 22 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=68, Invalid=394, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=462 [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 22 states, 22 states have (on average 3.772727272727273) internal successors, (83), 22 states have internal predecessors, (83), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,179 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,917 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,918 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,918 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,918 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,918 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable11 [2024-11-15 21:32:32,918 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === Targeting ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES === [ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES] === [2024-11-15 21:32:32,918 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 1724353176, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -477929625, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1746452508] [2024-11-15 21:32:32,919 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:32,920 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:32,973 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is sat [2024-11-15 21:32:32,973 INFO L357 TraceCheck]: Trace is feasible, we will do another trace check, this time with branch encoders. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,016 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is sat [2024-11-15 21:32:33,041 INFO L130 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found a feasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:33,041 INFO L340 BasicCegarLoop]: Counterexample is feasible [2024-11-15 21:32:33,042 INFO L782 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result UNSAFE for location ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATIONSUFFICIENT_THREAD_INSTANCES (0 of 1 remaining) [2024-11-15 21:32:33,042 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable12 [2024-11-15 21:32:33,044 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: Path program histogram: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2024-11-15 21:32:33,045 INFO L320 ceAbstractionStarter]: Result for error location ULTIMATE.start was UNSAFE (1/3) [2024-11-15 21:32:33,045 WARN L247 ceAbstractionStarter]: 2 thread instances were not sufficient, I will increase this number and restart the analysis [2024-11-15 21:32:33,046 INFO L492 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 3 thread instances. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,112 INFO L143 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 0 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,119 INFO L126 denceProviderFactory]: Independence Relation #1: [IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=true, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:33,141 INFO L181 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Running PartialOrderCegarLoop with 1 independence relations. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,141 INFO L332 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0 == of CEGAR loop == thr1Thread3of3ForFork0 ======== [2024-11-15 21:32:33,141 INFO L333 AbstractCegarLoop]: Settings: SEPARATE_VIOLATION_CHECK=true, mInterprocedural=true, mMaxIterations=1000000, mWatchIteration=1000000, mArtifact=RCFG, mInterpolation=FPandBP, mInterpolantAutomaton=STRAIGHT_LINE, mDumpAutomata=false, mAutomataFormat=ATS_NUMERATE, mDumpPath=., mDeterminiation=PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION, mMinimize=MINIMIZE_SEVPA, mAutomataTypeConcurrency=PARTIAL_ORDER_FA, mHoareTripleChecks=INCREMENTAL, mHoareAnnotationPositions=LoopHeads, mDumpOnlyReuseAutomata=false, mLimitTraceHistogram=0, mErrorLocTimeLimit=0, mLimitPathProgramCount=0, mCollectInterpolantStatistics=true, mHeuristicEmptinessCheck=false, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristic=ZERO, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristicRandomSeed=1337, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckSmtFeatureScoringMethod=DAGSIZE, mSMTFeatureExtraction=false, mSMTFeatureExtractionDumpPath=., mOverrideInterpolantAutomaton=false, mMcrInterpolantMethod=WP, mPorIndependenceSettings=[Lde.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.tracecheckerutils.partialorder.independence.IndependenceSettings;@2f928100, mLbeIndependenceSettings=[IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=false, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2024-11-15 21:32:33,141 INFO L334 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 2 error locations. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,827 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:33,827 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,827 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash -1430471142, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:33,827 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:33,827 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,828 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:33,828 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 2044366498, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:33,828 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:33,828 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [113260056] [2024-11-15 21:32:33,828 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:33,828 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:33,840 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:33,853 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,853 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [113260056] [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [113260056] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1911544674] [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 2 states [2024-11-15 21:32:33,854 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:33,855 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 2 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,855 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=1, Invalid=1, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=2 [2024-11-15 21:32:33,855 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:33,855 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:33,855 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 2 states, 2 states have (on average 36.0) internal successors, (72), 2 states have internal predecessors, (72), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:33,855 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,187 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,187 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable13 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,187 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:34,187 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,188 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 2085624562, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,188 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:34,188 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,188 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:34,189 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1784005836, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:34,189 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:34,189 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1798129039] [2024-11-15 21:32:34,189 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:34,189 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:34,206 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:34,260 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,261 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:34,261 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1798129039] [2024-11-15 21:32:34,261 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1798129039] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:34,262 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,262 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,262 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1284313440] [2024-11-15 21:32:34,262 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:34,262 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 4 states [2024-11-15 21:32:34,262 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:34,263 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,263 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,263 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,263 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:34,263 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 4 states, 4 states have (on average 23.5) internal successors, (94), 4 states have internal predecessors, (94), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:34,263 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,263 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,490 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,491 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,491 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable14 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,491 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:34,491 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 810244868, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -806835955, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [652448230] [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:34,492 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:34,516 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:34,941 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [652448230] [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [652448230] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [13] imperfect sequences [] total 13 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1647714360] [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 13 states [2024-11-15 21:32:34,942 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 13 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=29, Invalid=127, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 13 states, 13 states have (on average 7.538461538461538) internal successors, (98), 13 states have internal predecessors, (98), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:34,943 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:35,452 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:35,453 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:35,453 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:35,453 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable15 [2024-11-15 21:32:35,453 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:35,453 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 371137175, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1948881766, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [993039745] [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:35,454 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:35,523 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:37,044 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:37,044 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:37,044 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [993039745] [2024-11-15 21:32:37,044 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [993039745] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:37,044 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:37,045 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [25] imperfect sequences [] total 25 [2024-11-15 21:32:37,045 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [157940576] [2024-11-15 21:32:37,045 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:37,045 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 26 states [2024-11-15 21:32:37,045 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:37,046 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 26 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:37,046 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=71, Invalid=579, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=650 [2024-11-15 21:32:37,046 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:37,046 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:37,046 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 26 states, 25 states have (on average 4.16) internal successors, (104), 26 states have internal predecessors, (104), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:37,046 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:37,046 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:37,047 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:37,047 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:38,079 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:38,080 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:38,080 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:38,080 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 21 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:38,080 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable16 [2024-11-15 21:32:38,080 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash -878931736, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1468199439, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:38,081 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1768781061] [2024-11-15 21:32:38,082 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:38,082 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:38,148 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:40,064 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,065 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:40,065 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1768781061] [2024-11-15 21:32:40,065 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1768781061] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:40,065 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,065 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [31] imperfect sequences [] total 31 [2024-11-15 21:32:40,065 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1603221965] [2024-11-15 21:32:40,065 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:40,066 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 32 states [2024-11-15 21:32:40,066 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:40,067 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 32 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=99, Invalid=893, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=992 [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 32 states, 31 states have (on average 4.0) internal successors, (124), 32 states have internal predecessors, (124), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 21 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:40,068 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,435 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,435 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,435 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,435 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 21 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,436 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 23 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,436 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable17 [2024-11-15 21:32:41,436 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === Targeting thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:41,436 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,436 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash -1171182907, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:41,436 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:41,437 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:41,437 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:41,437 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 794144625, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:41,437 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:41,437 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2066333690] [2024-11-15 21:32:41,437 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:41,437 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:41,487 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:42,316 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2066333690] [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2066333690] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [17] imperfect sequences [] total 17 [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [2091653456] [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 18 states [2024-11-15 21:32:42,317 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:42,318 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 18 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,318 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=59, Invalid=247, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=306 [2024-11-15 21:32:42,318 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,318 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:42,318 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 18 states, 17 states have (on average 6.588235294117647) internal successors, (112), 18 states have internal predecessors, (112), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:42,319 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,319 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,319 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,319 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 21 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,319 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 23 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:42,319 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,058 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 34 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 40 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable18 [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:47,059 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash -1186812790, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1306970132, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1645062227] [2024-11-15 21:32:47,060 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:47,061 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:47,110 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:48,430 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,430 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1645062227] [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1645062227] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [23] imperfect sequences [] total 23 [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [235208878] [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 23 states [2024-11-15 21:32:48,431 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 23 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=68, Invalid=438, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=506 [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 23 states, 23 states have (on average 4.739130434782608) internal successors, (109), 23 states have internal predecessors, (109), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 34 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,432 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 40 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,433 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:48,433 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,232 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 34 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 40 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable19 [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === Targeting thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:50,233 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 1211770748, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 81692153, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1399669469] [2024-11-15 21:32:50,234 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:50,235 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:50,276 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:51,142 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,142 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:51,142 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1399669469] [2024-11-15 21:32:51,142 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1399669469] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:51,142 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,142 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [16] imperfect sequences [] total 16 [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1339991445] [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 17 states [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 17 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=60, Invalid=212, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=272 [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:51,143 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 17 states, 16 states have (on average 6.3125) internal successors, (101), 17 states have internal predecessors, (101), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 34 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 40 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:51,144 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,143 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 42 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable20 [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:53,144 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 115506023, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1392973557, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [409937294] [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:53,145 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:53,211 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:32:55,098 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,098 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:32:55,098 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [409937294] [2024-11-15 21:32:55,098 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [409937294] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:32:55,098 INFO L185 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,098 INFO L198 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [28] imperfect sequences [] total 28 [2024-11-15 21:32:55,099 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1995457080] [2024-11-15 21:32:55,099 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2024-11-15 21:32:55,099 INFO L548 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 29 states [2024-11-15 21:32:55,099 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:55,099 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 29 interpolants. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L146 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=110, Invalid=702, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=812 [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L471 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L472 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 29 states, 28 states have (on average 4.0) internal successors, (112), 29 states have internal predecessors, (112), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 42 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:55,100 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 14 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 42 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 18 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 24 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,515 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 37 states. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable21 [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L396 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 10 === Targeting thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION === [thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION] === [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L312 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Trying commutativity condition synthesis. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L132 ounterexampleChecker]: Examining path program with hash 1717782287, occurence #1 [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L134 ounterexampleChecker]: Commutativity condition synthesis is only active after more than 2 occurrences. Skipping... [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L322 artialOrderCegarLoop]: No commutativity proof found, falling back to feasibility check. [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L157 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -219889925, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2024-11-15 21:32:57,516 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1559042990] [2024-11-15 21:32:57,517 INFO L97 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2024-11-15 21:32:57,517 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2024-11-15 21:32:57,583 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:33:00,149 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 4 backedges. 0 proven. 3 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 1 trivial. 0 not checked. [2024-11-15 21:33:00,149 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2024-11-15 21:33:00,149 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1559042990] [2024-11-15 21:33:00,149 INFO L158 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1559042990] provided 0 perfect and 1 imperfect interpolant sequences [2024-11-15 21:33:00,149 INFO L334 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleZ3 [1973134482] [2024-11-15 21:33:00,150 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Changing assertion order to OUTSIDE_LOOP_FIRST1 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,150 INFO L173 SolverBuilder]: Constructing external solver with command: z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2024-11-15 21:33:00,150 INFO L189 MonitoredProcess]: No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,153 INFO L229 MonitoredProcess]: Starting monitored process 3 with /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) [2024-11-15 21:33:00,154 INFO L327 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (3)] Waiting until timeout for monitored process [2024-11-15 21:33:00,327 INFO L229 tOrderPrioritization]: Assert order OUTSIDE_LOOP_FIRST1 issued 1 check-sat command(s) [2024-11-15 21:33:00,327 INFO L230 tOrderPrioritization]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2024-11-15 21:33:00,330 INFO L256 TraceCheckSpWp]: Trace formula consists of 300 conjuncts, 48 conjuncts are in the unsatisfiable core [2024-11-15 21:33:00,336 INFO L279 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing forward predicates... [2024-11-15 21:33:00,549 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 20, result has 33.3 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:00,550 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 16 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,745 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 3 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 59 treesize of output 65 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,749 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 2 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 62 treesize of output 61 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,757 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 90 treesize of output 83 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,766 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 0 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 18 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,792 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 3 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 64 treesize of output 65 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,796 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 2 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 62 treesize of output 61 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,806 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 45 treesize of output 21 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,809 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 0 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 8 treesize of output 7 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,814 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 11 [2024-11-15 21:33:00,835 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 17, result has 29.2 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:00,835 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 41 treesize of output 25 [2024-11-15 21:33:01,610 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 9 [2024-11-15 21:33:02,767 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 18, result has 35.7 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:02,768 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 17 treesize of output 21 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,331 INFO L190 IndexEqualityManager]: detected not equals via solver [2024-11-15 21:33:03,412 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 139, result has 24.9 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,413 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 2 stores, 4 select indices, 4 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 6 index pairs), introduced 5 new quantified variables, introduced 9 case distinctions, treesize of input 143 treesize of output 179 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,436 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,437 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 92 treesize of output 102 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,682 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 189 treesize of output 168 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,738 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 24, result has 4.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,738 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 2 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 2 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 49 treesize of output 55 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,762 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 12, result has 60.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,763 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 2 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 46 treesize of output 42 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,770 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 7, result has 12.5 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,771 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 11 treesize of output 7 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,780 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 0 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 8 treesize of output 7 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,805 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 17, result has 29.2 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,806 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 18 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,836 INFO L190 IndexEqualityManager]: detected not equals via solver [2024-11-15 21:33:03,860 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 105, result has 4.5 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,860 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 2 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 4 case distinctions, treesize of input 111 treesize of output 108 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,881 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,881 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 59 treesize of output 69 [2024-11-15 21:33:03,919 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 81, result has 18.2 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:03,920 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 2 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 4 case distinctions, treesize of input 99 treesize of output 113 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,054 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 0 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 17 treesize of output 16 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,080 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 0 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 17 treesize of output 16 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,112 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 14, result has 50.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:04,113 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 108 treesize of output 119 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,319 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 11 treesize of output 7 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,670 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 3 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,705 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 3 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,775 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 3 [2024-11-15 21:33:04,795 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 3 [2024-11-15 21:33:08,980 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 8, result has 52.9 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:08,981 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 16 treesize of output 18 [2024-11-15 21:33:11,334 INFO L190 IndexEqualityManager]: detected not equals via solver [2024-11-15 21:33:11,947 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 678, result has 17.7 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:11,948 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 2 stores, 11 select indices, 11 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 55 index pairs), introduced 13 new quantified variables, introduced 73 case distinctions, treesize of input 8252 treesize of output 8256 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,130 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 32, result has 52.2 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:12,131 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 5 case distinctions, treesize of input 708 treesize of output 739 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,195 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:12,195 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 2 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 697 treesize of output 715 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,300 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 41, result has 39.7 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:12,301 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 2 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 4 case distinctions, treesize of input 680 treesize of output 720 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,368 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 668 treesize of output 666 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,438 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:12,438 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 666 treesize of output 676 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,488 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 661 treesize of output 659 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,535 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 659 treesize of output 662 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,658 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 32, result has 52.2 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:12,658 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 5 case distinctions, treesize of input 656 treesize of output 687 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,743 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:12,743 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 2 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 645 treesize of output 663 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,829 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 628 treesize of output 631 [2024-11-15 21:33:12,911 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:12,912 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 625 treesize of output 630 [2024-11-15 21:33:13,012 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:13,012 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 621 treesize of output 626 [2024-11-15 21:33:13,157 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 41, result has 39.7 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:13,158 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 2 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 4 new quantified variables, introduced 4 case distinctions, treesize of input 617 treesize of output 657 [2024-11-15 21:33:13,252 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:13,252 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 605 treesize of output 615 [2024-11-15 21:33:13,310 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 600 treesize of output 598 [2024-11-15 21:33:13,380 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 598 treesize of output 596 [2024-11-15 21:33:13,456 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 596 treesize of output 594 [2024-11-15 21:33:13,745 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 23, result has 17.9 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:33:13,745 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 30 treesize of output 30 [2024-11-15 21:35:08,305 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:08,306 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:08,480 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:08,485 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:08,485 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:08,551 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:08,556 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:08,556 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:08,678 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:08,678 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:08,756 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:08,761 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:08,761 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:08,890 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:08,890 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:08,936 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:08,941 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:08,941 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,065 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,066 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,515 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,520 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:09,520 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,579 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,579 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,687 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,688 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,706 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,706 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,831 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,831 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,852 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,852 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,892 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,893 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:09,978 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:09,978 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:10,057 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:10,058 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:10,087 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:10,088 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:10,163 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:10,164 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:10,435 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:10,436 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,032 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,033 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,091 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,097 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:11,097 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,342 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,348 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:11,348 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,515 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,516 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,604 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,609 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:11,609 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,688 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,694 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:11,694 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,926 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,933 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:11,933 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:11,973 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:11,979 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:11,979 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:12,134 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:12,143 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:12,144 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:12,244 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:12,251 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:12,251 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:12,654 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:12,655 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:12,680 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:12,680 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:13,059 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,059 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,060 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:13,091 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,092 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,092 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:13,164 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,170 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:13,170 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:13,195 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,196 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,196 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:13,276 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,282 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:13,283 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:13,318 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,318 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:13,977 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:13,977 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:14,079 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:14,084 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:14,085 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:14,235 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:14,236 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:15,141 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:15,142 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:15,198 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:15,204 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:15,204 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:15,913 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:15,919 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:15,919 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:16,008 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:16,014 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:16,014 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:16,037 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:16,037 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:16,549 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:16,555 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:16,555 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:16,653 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:16,659 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:16,660 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:16,870 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:16,871 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:17,056 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:17,057 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:17,105 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:17,111 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:17,112 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:17,298 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:17,304 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:17,304 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:17,785 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:17,786 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:17,830 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:17,835 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:17,835 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:17,976 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:17,982 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:17,982 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:18,925 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:18,925 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:18,976 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:18,982 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:18,983 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:19,065 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:19,071 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:19,071 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:19,405 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:19,411 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:19,411 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:19,445 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:19,452 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:19,452 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:20,650 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:20,651 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:20,720 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:20,726 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:20,726 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:21,026 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:21,032 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:21,032 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:21,403 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:21,409 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:21,409 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:21,602 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:21,608 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:21,608 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:21,720 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:21,726 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:21,726 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:21,752 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:35:21,759 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 9, result has 10.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:21,759 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 19 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:35:32,344 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 476, result has 51.7 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:35:32,347 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 11 select indices, 11 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 55 index pairs), introduced 11 new quantified variables, introduced 65 case distinctions, treesize of input 7331 treesize of output 7184 [2024-11-15 21:35:34,305 INFO L173 IndexEqualityManager]: detected equality via solver [2024-11-15 21:40:02,437 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 4.47m on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 7011 DAG size of output: 6725 (called from [L 346] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.arrays.Elim1Store.elim1) [2024-11-15 21:40:02,441 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 1410, result has 90.5 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:40:02,451 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 57 select indices, 57 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1596 index pairs), introduced 57 new quantified variables, introduced 1654 case distinctions, treesize of input 6968 treesize of output 20283 [2024-11-15 21:42:14,244 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:42:14,246 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 18 select indices, 18 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 153 index pairs), introduced 18 new quantified variables, introduced 153 case distinctions, treesize of input 3785 treesize of output 4943 [2024-11-15 21:42:24,500 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.70s on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 8688 DAG size of output: 8689 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:42:27,798 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:42:27,799 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 16 select indices, 16 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 120 index pairs), introduced 16 new quantified variables, introduced 120 case distinctions, treesize of input 4257 treesize of output 5109 [2024-11-15 21:42:39,073 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 11.25s on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 9260 DAG size of output: 9225 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:42:45,192 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:42:45,194 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 3959 treesize of output 3927 [2024-11-15 21:42:50,611 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.40s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9224 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:42:59,884 INFO L224 Elim1Store]: Index analysis took 8782 ms [2024-11-15 21:44:02,301 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 1.04m on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 6729 DAG size of output: 569 (called from [L 346] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.arrays.Elim1Store.elim1) [2024-11-15 21:44:02,301 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 12320, result has 6.8 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:44:02,302 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 58 select indices, 58 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1653 index pairs), introduced 58 new quantified variables, introduced 1653 case distinctions, treesize of input 687 treesize of output 1475 [2024-11-15 21:44:14,370 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 12.05s on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 9505 DAG size of output: 9505 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:44:21,076 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 561 treesize of output 449 [2024-11-15 21:44:27,058 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.97s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9502 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:44:27,746 INFO L349 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2024-11-15 21:44:27,746 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 171 treesize of output 145 [2024-11-15 21:44:33,715 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.95s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9503 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:44:34,341 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 15 treesize of output 11 [2024-11-15 21:44:40,318 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.96s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9502 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:44:46,490 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.92s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9500 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:44:47,089 INFO L378 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 7 treesize of output 5 [2024-11-15 21:44:53,035 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.93s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9499 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:44:59,201 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.92s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9496 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:45:05,695 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 5.91s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 9494 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) [2024-11-15 21:45:16,977 WARN L286 SmtUtils]: Spent 10.70s on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 9492 DAG size of output: 9491 (called from [L 728] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher.simplify) Received shutdown request... [2024-11-15 21:45:54,806 WARN L340 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 (2)] Timeout while monitored process is still running, waiting 1000 ms for graceful end [2024-11-15 21:45:54,806 WARN L340 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (3)] Timeout while monitored process is still running, waiting 1000 ms for graceful end [2024-11-15 21:45:54,806 WARN L340 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (1)] Timeout while monitored process is still running, waiting 1000 ms for graceful end [2024-11-15 21:45:54,986 INFO L782 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location thr1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION (1 of 2 remaining) [2024-11-15 21:45:55,006 INFO L552 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (3)] Ended with exit code 0 [2024-11-15 21:45:55,186 WARN L453 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: 3 /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true,SelfDestructingSolverStorable22 [2024-11-15 21:45:55,187 WARN L596 AbstractCegarLoop]: Verification canceled: while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 120 with TraceHistMax 4,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing forward predicates,while PolyPacSimplificationTermWalker was simplifying a ATOM-1 term,while PolyPacSimplificationTermWalker was simplifying 2 xjuncts wrt. a ∧-2071-27-5-48-3-3-3-2-2-1 context. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,187 INFO L782 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location thr1Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION (0 of 2 remaining) [2024-11-15 21:45:55,188 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: Path program histogram: [2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2024-11-15 21:45:55,189 INFO L320 ceAbstractionStarter]: Result for error location thr1Thread3of3ForFork0 was TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT (1/4) [2024-11-15 21:45:55,190 INFO L242 ceAbstractionStarter]: Analysis of concurrent program completed with 3 thread instances [2024-11-15 21:45:55,190 INFO L173 ceAbstractionStarter]: Computing trace abstraction results [2024-11-15 21:45:55,209 INFO L552 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate-jdk21/releaseScripts/default/UGemCutter-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 (2)] Ended with exit code 0 [2024-11-15 21:45:55,210 INFO L201 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction CFG 15.11 09:45:55 BasicIcfg [2024-11-15 21:45:55,210 INFO L131 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2024-11-15 21:45:55,211 INFO L158 Benchmark]: Toolchain (without parser) took 813264.33ms. Allocated memory was 100.7MB in the beginning and 1.2GB in the end (delta: 1.1GB). Free memory was 71.8MB in the beginning and 865.8MB in the end (delta: -794.0MB). Peak memory consumption was 783.9MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,211 INFO L158 Benchmark]: CDTParser took 0.23ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory is still 52.7MB. There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,211 INFO L158 Benchmark]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 383.07ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 71.6MB in the beginning and 51.4MB in the end (delta: 20.2MB). Peak memory consumption was 21.0MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,211 INFO L158 Benchmark]: Boogie Procedure Inliner took 49.34ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 51.4MB in the beginning and 49.4MB in the end (delta: 1.9MB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,212 INFO L158 Benchmark]: Boogie Preprocessor took 29.02ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 49.4MB in the beginning and 48.1MB in the end (delta: 1.4MB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,212 INFO L158 Benchmark]: RCFGBuilder took 673.25ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 48.1MB in the beginning and 62.3MB in the end (delta: -14.3MB). Peak memory consumption was 35.0MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,212 INFO L158 Benchmark]: TraceAbstraction took 812118.04ms. Allocated memory was 100.7MB in the beginning and 1.2GB in the end (delta: 1.1GB). Free memory was 61.8MB in the beginning and 865.8MB in the end (delta: -804.0MB). Peak memory consumption was 774.1MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2024-11-15 21:45:55,213 INFO L338 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### End [Toolchain 1] ####################### --- Results --- * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.core: - StatisticsResult: Toolchain Benchmarks Benchmark results are: * CDTParser took 0.23ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory is still 52.7MB. There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 383.07ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 71.6MB in the beginning and 51.4MB in the end (delta: 20.2MB). Peak memory consumption was 21.0MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * Boogie Procedure Inliner took 49.34ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 51.4MB in the beginning and 49.4MB in the end (delta: 1.9MB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * Boogie Preprocessor took 29.02ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 49.4MB in the beginning and 48.1MB in the end (delta: 1.4MB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * RCFGBuilder took 673.25ms. Allocated memory is still 100.7MB. Free memory was 48.1MB in the beginning and 62.3MB in the end (delta: -14.3MB). Peak memory consumption was 35.0MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * TraceAbstraction took 812118.04ms. Allocated memory was 100.7MB in the beginning and 1.2GB in the end (delta: 1.1GB). Free memory was 61.8MB in the beginning and 865.8MB in the end (delta: -804.0MB). Peak memory consumption was 774.1MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: - StatisticsResult: Partial order reduction statistics Independence relation #1 benchmarks: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1912, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 85, dependent conditional: 61, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1827, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1827, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1329, independent: 1305, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1305, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1329, independent: 1289, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1289, dependent: 40, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 40, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 40, independent: 16, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 16, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 40, independent: 16, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 16, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 859, independent: 295, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 295, dependent: 564, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 564, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 522, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 522, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 1329, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1329] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 1329, Positive cache size: 1305, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 1305, Negative cache size: 24, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 24, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 362, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 61, Persistent sets #1 benchmarks: Persistent set computation time: 1.0s, Number of persistent set computation: 166, Number of trivial persistent sets: 125, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1489, independent: 1465, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1912, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 85, dependent conditional: 61, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 362, independent unconditional: 1465, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1827, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 1827, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1827, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1329, independent: 1305, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1305, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 1329, independent: 1289, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 1289, dependent: 40, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 40, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 40, independent: 16, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 16, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 40, independent: 16, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 16, dependent: 24, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 24, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 859, independent: 295, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 295, dependent: 564, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 564, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 1851, independent: 522, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 522, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 1329, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1329] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 1329, Positive cache size: 1305, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 1305, Negative cache size: 24, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 24, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 362, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 61 - StatisticsResult: Partial order reduction statistics Independence relation #1 benchmarks: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 801, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 32, dependent conditional: 24, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 769, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 769, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 769, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 1329, Positive cache size: 1305, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 1305, Negative cache size: 24, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 24, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 106, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 24, Persistent sets #1 benchmarks: Persistent set computation time: 0.0s, Number of persistent set computation: 65, Number of trivial persistent sets: 63, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 671, independent: 663, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 801, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 32, dependent conditional: 24, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 106, independent unconditional: 663, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 769, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 769, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 0, independent: 0, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 0, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 777, independent: 769, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 769, dependent: 8, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 8, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 1329, Positive cache size: 1305, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 1305, Negative cache size: 24, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 24, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 106, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 24 - StatisticsResult: Partial order reduction statistics Independence relation #1 benchmarks: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3766, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 83, dependent conditional: 60, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3683, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3683, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3323, independent: 3300, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3300, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3323, independent: 3279, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3279, dependent: 44, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 44, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 44, independent: 21, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 21, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 44, independent: 21, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 21, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 749, independent: 291, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 291, dependent: 458, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 458, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 383, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 383, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 3323, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 3323] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 4652, Positive cache size: 4605, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 4605, Negative cache size: 47, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 47, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 272, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 60, Persistent sets #1 benchmarks: Persistent set computation time: 0.8s, Number of persistent set computation: 141, Number of trivial persistent sets: 135, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3434, independent: 3411, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3766, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 83, dependent conditional: 60, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 272, independent unconditional: 3411, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3683, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 3683, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3683, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3323, independent: 3300, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3300, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 3323, independent: 3279, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 3279, dependent: 44, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 44, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 44, independent: 21, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 21, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 44, independent: 21, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 21, dependent: 23, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 23, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 749, independent: 291, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 291, dependent: 458, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 458, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 3706, independent: 383, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 383, dependent: 0, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 0, unknown: 3323, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 3323] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 4652, Positive cache size: 4605, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 4605, Negative cache size: 47, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 47, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 272, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 60 - StatisticsResult: Partial order reduction statistics Independence relation #1 benchmarks: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 65897, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 3880, dependent conditional: 3766, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62218, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 201, dependent conditional: 87, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62218, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 201, dependent conditional: 87, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 778, dependent conditional: 664, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 42, independent unconditional: 61975, dependent: 778, dependent conditional: 535, dependent unconditional: 243, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 42, independent unconditional: 61975, dependent: 778, dependent conditional: 535, dependent unconditional: 243, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 10781, independent: 10600, independent conditional: 11, independent unconditional: 10589, dependent: 181, dependent conditional: 64, dependent unconditional: 117, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 10781, independent: 10537, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 10537, dependent: 244, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 244, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 244, independent: 63, independent conditional: 11, independent unconditional: 52, dependent: 181, dependent conditional: 64, dependent unconditional: 117, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 244, independent: 63, independent conditional: 11, independent unconditional: 52, dependent: 181, dependent conditional: 64, dependent unconditional: 117, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 4886, independent: 873, independent conditional: 371, independent unconditional: 502, dependent: 4013, dependent conditional: 1808, dependent unconditional: 2205, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 51417, independent conditional: 31, independent unconditional: 51386, dependent: 597, dependent conditional: 471, dependent unconditional: 126, unknown: 10781, unknown conditional: 75, unknown unconditional: 10706] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 15433, Positive cache size: 15205, Positive conditional cache size: 11, Positive unconditional cache size: 15194, Negative cache size: 228, Negative conditional cache size: 64, Negative unconditional cache size: 164, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 50372, Maximal queried relation: 7, Independence queries for same thread: 3679, Persistent sets #1 benchmarks: Persistent set computation time: 3.1s, Number of persistent set computation: 5029, Number of trivial persistent sets: 4671, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 11846, independent: 11732, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 114, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 65897, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 3880, dependent conditional: 3766, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62218, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 201, dependent conditional: 87, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62218, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 201, dependent conditional: 87, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 50285, independent unconditional: 11732, dependent: 778, dependent conditional: 664, dependent unconditional: 114, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 42, independent unconditional: 61975, dependent: 778, dependent conditional: 535, dependent unconditional: 243, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 62017, independent conditional: 42, independent unconditional: 61975, dependent: 778, dependent conditional: 535, dependent unconditional: 243, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 10781, independent: 10600, independent conditional: 11, independent unconditional: 10589, dependent: 181, dependent conditional: 64, dependent unconditional: 117, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 10781, independent: 10537, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 10537, dependent: 244, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 244, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 244, independent: 63, independent conditional: 11, independent unconditional: 52, dependent: 181, dependent conditional: 64, dependent unconditional: 117, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 244, independent: 63, independent conditional: 11, independent unconditional: 52, dependent: 181, dependent conditional: 64, dependent unconditional: 117, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 4886, independent: 873, independent conditional: 371, independent unconditional: 502, dependent: 4013, dependent conditional: 1808, dependent unconditional: 2205, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , Symbolic Condition Computations: 0, Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 62795, independent: 51417, independent conditional: 31, independent unconditional: 51386, dependent: 597, dependent conditional: 471, dependent unconditional: 126, unknown: 10781, unknown conditional: 75, unknown unconditional: 10706] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 15433, Positive cache size: 15205, Positive conditional cache size: 11, Positive unconditional cache size: 15194, Negative cache size: 228, Negative conditional cache size: 64, Negative unconditional cache size: 164, Unknown cache size: 0, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 0, Eliminated conditions: 50372, Maximal queried relation: 7, Independence queries for same thread: 3679 - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 708]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that a call to reach_error is unreachable Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 120 with TraceHistMax 4,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing forward predicates,while PolyPacSimplificationTermWalker was simplifying a ATOM-1 term,while PolyPacSimplificationTermWalker was simplifying 2 xjuncts wrt. a ∧-2071-27-5-48-3-3-3-2-2-1 context. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 728]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that a call to reach_error is unreachable Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 120 with TraceHistMax 4,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing forward predicates,while PolyPacSimplificationTermWalker was simplifying a ATOM-1 term,while PolyPacSimplificationTermWalker was simplifying 2 xjuncts wrt. a ∧-2071-27-5-48-3-3-3-2-2-1 context. - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data for errors in thread instance: thr1Thread1of1ForFork0 with 1 thread instances CFG has 3 procedures, 144 locations, 5 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. OverallTime: 4.4s, OverallIterations: 4, TraceHistogramMax: 0, PathProgramHistogramMax: 1, EmptinessCheckTime: 1.8s, AutomataDifference: 0.0s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 0.0s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: , PredicateUnifierStatistics: No data available, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=0occurred in iteration=0, InterpolantAutomatonStates: 28, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: No data available, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.0s SsaConstructionTime, 0.2s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 2.2s InterpolantComputationTime, 182 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 182 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 4 NumberOfCheckSat, 178 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 1653 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 4 InterpolantComputations, 4 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available, ConComCheckerStatistics: CheckTime: 0.0s, ConditionCalculationTime: 0.0s, CommutingCounterexamples: 0, ConditionCalculations: 0, TraceChecks: 0, UnknownTraceChecks: 0, ImperfectProofs: 0, QuantifiedConditions: 0, FalseConditions: 0 - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data for errors in thread instance: ULTIMATE.start with 1 thread instances CFG has 3 procedures, 144 locations, 5 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. OverallTime: 1.0s, OverallIterations: 4, TraceHistogramMax: 0, PathProgramHistogramMax: 1, EmptinessCheckTime: 0.2s, AutomataDifference: 0.0s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 0.0s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: , PredicateUnifierStatistics: No data available, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=0occurred in iteration=0, InterpolantAutomatonStates: 17, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: No data available, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.0s SsaConstructionTime, 0.0s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 0.6s InterpolantComputationTime, 200 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 200 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 4 NumberOfCheckSat, 140 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 806 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 3 InterpolantComputations, 3 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available, ConComCheckerStatistics: CheckTime: 0.0s, ConditionCalculationTime: 0.0s, CommutingCounterexamples: 0, ConditionCalculations: 0, TraceChecks: 0, UnknownTraceChecks: 0, ImperfectProofs: 0, QuantifiedConditions: 0, FalseConditions: 0 - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data for errors in thread instance: ULTIMATE.start with 2 thread instances CFG has 4 procedures, 201 locations, 7 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. OverallTime: 4.3s, OverallIterations: 5, TraceHistogramMax: 0, PathProgramHistogramMax: 1, EmptinessCheckTime: 1.9s, AutomataDifference: 0.0s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 0.0s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: , PredicateUnifierStatistics: No data available, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=0occurred in iteration=0, InterpolantAutomatonStates: 39, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: No data available, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.0s SsaConstructionTime, 0.1s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 2.1s InterpolantComputationTime, 393 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 393 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 5 NumberOfCheckSat, 298 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 2846 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 4 InterpolantComputations, 4 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available, ConComCheckerStatistics: CheckTime: 0.0s, ConditionCalculationTime: 0.0s, CommutingCounterexamples: 0, ConditionCalculations: 0, TraceChecks: 0, UnknownTraceChecks: 0, ImperfectProofs: 0, QuantifiedConditions: 0, FalseConditions: 0 - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data for errors in thread instance: thr1Thread3of3ForFork0 with 1 thread instances CFG has 5 procedures, 258 locations, 9 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. OverallTime: 802.1s, OverallIterations: 10, TraceHistogramMax: 0, PathProgramHistogramMax: 2, EmptinessCheckTime: 15.1s, AutomataDifference: 0.0s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 0.0s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: , PredicateUnifierStatistics: No data available, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=0occurred in iteration=0, InterpolantAutomatonStates: 202, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: No data available, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.0s SsaConstructionTime, 0.3s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 8.8s InterpolantComputationTime, 940 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 940 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 9 NumberOfCheckSat, 931 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 14755 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 9 InterpolantComputations, 9 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available, ConComCheckerStatistics: CheckTime: 0.0s, ConditionCalculationTime: 0.0s, CommutingCounterexamples: 0, ConditionCalculations: 0, TraceChecks: 0, UnknownTraceChecks: 0, ImperfectProofs: 0, QuantifiedConditions: 0, FalseConditions: 0 RESULT: Ultimate could not prove your program: Timeout Completed graceful shutdown