/usr/bin/java -Xmx8000000000 -Xss4m -jar ./plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.5.800.v20200727-1323.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata ./data -s ../../../trunk/examples/settings/gemcutter/NewStatesSleepPersistentFixedOrder-VarAbsGlobalSmt.epf --traceabstraction.cegar.restart.behaviour ONE_CEGAR_PER_THREAD_INSTANCE -tc ../../../trunk/examples/toolchains/AutomizerCInline.xml --cacsl2boogietranslator.check.unreachability.of.error.function.in.sv-comp.mode false --cacsl2boogietranslator.check.absence.of.signed.integer.overflows true -i ../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.14-races/linux-3.14--drivers--net--irda--w83977af_ir.ko.cil.i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is Ultimate 0.2.2-dev-9868fc6-m [2022-11-15 16:16:34,568 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,569 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,592 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,593 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,593 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,594 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,595 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,596 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,607 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,608 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,609 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,609 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,610 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,610 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,611 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,611 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,612 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,613 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,614 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,614 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,615 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,616 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,616 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,618 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,618 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,619 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,619 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,619 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,620 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,620 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,620 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,621 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,621 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,622 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,622 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,622 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,622 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,623 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,623 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2022-11-15 16:16:34,623 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,624 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/settings/gemcutter/NewStatesSleepPersistentFixedOrder-VarAbsGlobalSmt.epf [2022-11-15 16:16:34,651 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2022-11-15 16:16:34,651 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2022-11-15 16:16:34,652 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of UltimateCore differ from their defaults: [2022-11-15 16:16:34,652 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Log level for class=de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.smtlibutils.quantifier.QuantifierPusher=ERROR; [2022-11-15 16:16:34,652 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Boogie Procedure Inliner differ from their defaults: [2022-11-15 16:16:34,652 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Ignore calls to procedures called more than once=ONLY_FOR_SEQUENTIAL_PROGRAMS [2022-11-15 16:16:34,653 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of BlockEncodingV2 differ from their defaults: [2022-11-15 16:16:34,653 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Create parallel compositions if possible=false [2022-11-15 16:16:34,653 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use SBE=true [2022-11-15 16:16:34,653 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2022-11-15 16:16:34,653 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2022-11-15 16:16:34,653 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2022-11-15 16:16:34,654 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2022-11-15 16:16:34,655 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2022-11-15 16:16:34,655 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Size of a code block=SequenceOfStatements [2022-11-15 16:16:34,658 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * To the following directory=./dump/ [2022-11-15 16:16:34,659 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2022-11-15 16:16:34,659 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2022-11-15 16:16:34,660 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2022-11-15 16:16:34,660 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Apply one-shot large block encoding in concurrent analysis=false [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstraction used for commutativity in POR=VARIABLES_GLOBAL [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Automaton type used in concurrency analysis=PARTIAL_ORDER_FA [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2022-11-15 16:16:34,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * CEGAR restart behaviour=ONE_CEGAR_PER_THREAD_INSTANCE [2022-11-15 16:16:34,662 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Partial Order Reduction in concurrent analysis=PERSISTENT_SLEEP_NEW_STATES_FIXEDORDER [2022-11-15 16:16:34,662 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 (file:/storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/plugins/com.sun.xml.bind_2.2.0.v201505121915.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int) WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: CEGAR restart behaviour -> ONE_CEGAR_PER_THREAD_INSTANCE Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator: Check unreachability of error function in SV-COMP mode -> false Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator: Check absence of signed integer overflows -> true [2022-11-15 16:16:34,832 INFO L75 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2022-11-15 16:16:34,846 INFO L261 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2022-11-15 16:16:34,847 INFO L217 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2022-11-15 16:16:34,848 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2022-11-15 16:16:34,848 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2022-11-15 16:16:34,849 INFO L432 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.14-races/linux-3.14--drivers--net--irda--w83977af_ir.ko.cil.i [2022-11-15 16:16:34,904 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/42d59120c/d1aab4fdf8a54c74b91ede0eb7034491/FLAGffe07f167 [2022-11-15 16:16:35,496 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2022-11-15 16:16:35,497 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /storage/repos/ultimate/trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.14-races/linux-3.14--drivers--net--irda--w83977af_ir.ko.cil.i [2022-11-15 16:16:35,526 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/42d59120c/d1aab4fdf8a54c74b91ede0eb7034491/FLAGffe07f167 [2022-11-15 16:16:35,942 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/42d59120c/d1aab4fdf8a54c74b91ede0eb7034491 [2022-11-15 16:16:35,944 INFO L299 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2022-11-15 16:16:35,945 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 5 elements. [2022-11-15 16:16:35,946 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:35,946 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2022-11-15 16:16:35,961 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2022-11-15 16:16:35,962 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 15.11 04:16:35" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:35,962 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@11d1f3c7 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:35, skipping insertion in model container [2022-11-15 16:16:35,962 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 15.11 04:16:35" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:35,967 INFO L145 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2022-11-15 16:16:36,041 INFO L178 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2022-11-15 16:16:37,207 WARN L233 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /storage/repos/ultimate/trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.14-races/linux-3.14--drivers--net--irda--w83977af_ir.ko.cil.i[236326,236339] [2022-11-15 16:16:37,427 INFO L210 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2022-11-15 16:16:37,447 INFO L203 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2022-11-15 16:16:37,718 WARN L233 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /storage/repos/ultimate/trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.14-races/linux-3.14--drivers--net--irda--w83977af_ir.ko.cil.i[236326,236339] [2022-11-15 16:16:37,730 INFO L210 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2022-11-15 16:16:37,818 INFO L208 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2022-11-15 16:16:37,818 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37 WrapperNode [2022-11-15 16:16:37,818 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:37,819 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:37,819 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Procedure Inliner... [2022-11-15 16:16:37,819 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Procedure Inliner initialized [2022-11-15 16:16:37,824 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:37,889 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer Inliner from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,026 INFO L138 Inliner]: procedures = 326, calls = 1240, calls flagged for inlining = 468, calls inlined = 783, statements flattened = 7204 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,026 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:38,027 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:38,027 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,027 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2022-11-15 16:16:38,033 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,033 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,059 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,059 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,148 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,213 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,230 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer LTLStepAnnotator from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,245 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,276 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:38,277 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:38,278 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,278 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2022-11-15 16:16:38,278 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (1/1) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:38,285 INFO L173 SolverBuilder]: Constructing external solver with command: z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,293 INFO L189 MonitoredProcess]: No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,304 INFO L229 MonitoredProcess]: Starting monitored process 1 with /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) [2022-11-15 16:16:38,343 INFO L327 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (1)] Waiting until timeout for monitored process [2022-11-15 16:16:38,350 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,350 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,350 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_interrupt_scenario_2 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,350 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_interrupt_scenario_2 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,350 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_insmod_4 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,350 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_insmod_4 [2022-11-15 16:16:38,350 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~$Pointer$ [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~$Pointer$ [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~int [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #PthreadsMutexLock [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnHeap [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocInit [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~$Pointer$ [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2022-11-15 16:16:38,351 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2022-11-15 16:16:38,355 WARN L209 CfgBuilder]: User set CodeBlockSize to SequenceOfStatements but program contains fork statements. Overwriting the user preferences and setting CodeBlockSize to SingleStatement [2022-11-15 16:16:38,870 INFO L235 CfgBuilder]: Building ICFG [2022-11-15 16:16:38,872 INFO L261 CfgBuilder]: Building CFG for each procedure with an implementation [2022-11-15 16:16:43,014 INFO L276 CfgBuilder]: Performing block encoding [2022-11-15 16:16:43,046 INFO L295 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2022-11-15 16:16:43,046 INFO L300 CfgBuilder]: Removed 0 assume(true) statements. [2022-11-15 16:16:43,054 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 15.11 04:16:43 BoogieIcfgContainer [2022-11-15 16:16:43,054 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:43,100 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:16:43,100 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2022-11-15 16:16:43,104 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2022-11-15 16:16:43,105 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 15.11 04:16:35" (1/3) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:43,105 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@1354547 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 15.11 04:16:43, skipping insertion in model container [2022-11-15 16:16:43,105 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 15.11 04:16:37" (2/3) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:43,105 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@1354547 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 15.11 04:16:43, skipping insertion in model container [2022-11-15 16:16:43,105 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 15.11 04:16:43" (3/3) ... [2022-11-15 16:16:43,106 INFO L112 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG linux-3.14--drivers--net--irda--w83977af_ir.ko.cil.i [2022-11-15 16:16:43,112 WARN L145 ceAbstractionStarter]: Switching off computation of Hoare annotation because input is a concurrent program [2022-11-15 16:16:43,119 INFO L203 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:false NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2022-11-15 16:16:43,119 INFO L162 ceAbstractionStarter]: Applying trace abstraction to program that has 560 error locations. [2022-11-15 16:16:43,119 INFO L515 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 1 thread instances. [2022-11-15 16:16:44,113 INFO L144 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 13 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2022-11-15 16:16:44,332 INFO L100 denceProviderFactory]: Independence Relation #1: [IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=VARIABLES_GLOBAL, UseConditional=true, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2022-11-15 16:16:44,333 INFO L173 SolverBuilder]: Constructing external solver with command: z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 [2022-11-15 16:16:44,333 INFO L189 MonitoredProcess]: No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 [2022-11-15 16:16:44,335 INFO L229 MonitoredProcess]: Starting monitored process 2 with /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) [2022-11-15 16:16:44,340 INFO L327 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 (2)] Waiting until timeout for monitored process [2022-11-15 16:16:44,386 INFO L159 artialOrderCegarLoop]: Running PartialOrderCegarLoop with 1 independence relations. [2022-11-15 16:16:44,395 INFO L356 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0 == of CEGAR loop == ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Thread1of1ForFork2 ======== [2022-11-15 16:16:44,401 INFO L357 AbstractCegarLoop]: Settings: SEPARATE_VIOLATION_CHECK=true, mInterprocedural=true, mMaxIterations=1000000, mWatchIteration=1000000, mArtifact=RCFG, mInterpolation=FPandBP, mInterpolantAutomaton=STRAIGHT_LINE, mDumpAutomata=false, mAutomataFormat=ATS_NUMERATE, mDumpPath=., mDeterminiation=PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION, mMinimize=MINIMIZE_SEVPA, mHoare=true, mAutomataTypeConcurrency=PARTIAL_ORDER_FA, mHoareTripleChecks=INCREMENTAL, mHoareAnnotationPositions=LoopsAndPotentialCycles, mDumpOnlyReuseAutomata=false, mLimitTraceHistogram=0, mErrorLocTimeLimit=0, mLimitPathProgramCount=0, mCollectInterpolantStatistics=true, mHeuristicEmptinessCheck=false, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristic=ZERO, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckAStarHeuristicRandomSeed=1337, mHeuristicEmptinessCheckSmtFeatureScoringMethod=DAGSIZE, mSMTFeatureExtraction=false, mSMTFeatureExtractionDumpPath=., mOverrideInterpolantAutomaton=false, mMcrInterpolantMethod=WP, mPorIndependenceSettings=[Lde.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.tracecheckerutils.partialorder.independence.IndependenceSettings;@4dbb2daa, mLbeIndependenceSettings=[IndependenceType=SEMANTIC, AbstractionType=NONE, UseConditional=false, UseSemiCommutativity=true, Solver=Z3, SolverTimeout=1000ms] [2022-11-15 16:16:44,401 INFO L358 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 160 error locations. [2022-11-15 16:22:59,663 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:22:59,666 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:22:59,667 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -637396961, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:22:59,673 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:22:59,674 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1512368735] [2022-11-15 16:22:59,674 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:22:59,674 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:22:59,975 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:23:00,836 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:23:00,837 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:23:00,837 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1512368735] [2022-11-15 16:23:00,838 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1512368735] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:23:00,838 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:23:00,839 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2022-11-15 16:23:00,840 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1687022646] [2022-11-15 16:23:00,840 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:23:00,849 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 2 states [2022-11-15 16:23:00,849 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:23:00,867 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 2 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:23:00,869 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=1, Invalid=1, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=2 [2022-11-15 16:23:00,869 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:23:00,883 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:23:00,886 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 2 states, 2 states have (on average 945.0) internal successors, (1890), 2 states have internal predecessors, (1890), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:23:00,886 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:23:26,414 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:23:26,414 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable0 [2022-11-15 16:23:26,415 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:23:26,415 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:23:26,415 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -8294262, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:23:26,416 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:23:26,416 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1514350985] [2022-11-15 16:23:26,416 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:23:26,416 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:23:26,650 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:23:33,754 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:23:33,754 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:23:33,755 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1514350985] [2022-11-15 16:23:33,755 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1514350985] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:23:33,755 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:23:33,755 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [11] imperfect sequences [] total 11 [2022-11-15 16:23:33,755 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [592816710] [2022-11-15 16:23:33,755 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:23:33,757 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 11 states [2022-11-15 16:23:33,758 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:23:33,758 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:23:33,758 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=19, Invalid=91, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2022-11-15 16:23:33,759 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:23:33,762 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:23:33,763 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 11 states, 11 states have (on average 169.9090909090909) internal successors, (1869), 11 states have internal predecessors, (1869), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:23:33,764 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:23:33,764 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:22,653 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:22,654 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:22,654 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable1 [2022-11-15 16:24:22,654 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:24:22,654 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:24:22,655 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 368975458, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:24:22,655 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:24:22,655 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [586263152] [2022-11-15 16:24:22,656 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:24:22,656 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:24:22,906 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:24:26,430 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:24:26,430 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:24:26,430 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [586263152] [2022-11-15 16:24:26,431 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [586263152] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:24:26,431 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:24:26,431 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [11] imperfect sequences [] total 11 [2022-11-15 16:24:26,431 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [661458652] [2022-11-15 16:24:26,431 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:24:26,433 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 11 states [2022-11-15 16:24:26,433 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:24:26,433 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:24:26,434 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=19, Invalid=91, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2022-11-15 16:24:26,434 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:26,440 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:24:26,442 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 11 states, 11 states have (on average 175.9090909090909) internal successors, (1935), 11 states have internal predecessors, (1935), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:24:26,442 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:26,442 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:26,442 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:47,447 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:47,447 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:47,448 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:47,448 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable2 [2022-11-15 16:24:47,448 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:24:47,448 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:24:47,449 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 459821051, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:24:47,449 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:24:47,449 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1805749540] [2022-11-15 16:24:47,449 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:24:47,450 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:24:47,740 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:24:48,406 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:24:48,407 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:24:48,407 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1805749540] [2022-11-15 16:24:48,407 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1805749540] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:24:48,407 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:24:48,407 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2022-11-15 16:24:48,407 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1730540415] [2022-11-15 16:24:48,408 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:24:48,409 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 3 states [2022-11-15 16:24:48,409 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:24:48,410 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:24:48,413 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2022-11-15 16:24:48,413 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:48,417 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:24:48,419 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 3 states, 3 states have (on average 667.0) internal successors, (2001), 3 states have internal predecessors, (2001), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:24:48,419 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:48,419 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:48,419 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:24:48,419 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:09,207 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:09,207 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:09,207 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:09,207 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:09,208 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable3 [2022-11-15 16:25:09,208 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:25:09,208 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:25:09,209 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1231159017, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:25:09,209 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:25:09,209 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1622991002] [2022-11-15 16:25:09,209 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:25:09,209 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:25:10,163 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:25:17,956 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,956 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:25:17,956 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1622991002] [2022-11-15 16:25:17,956 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1622991002] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:25:17,957 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,957 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [20] imperfect sequences [] total 20 [2022-11-15 16:25:17,957 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [916509887] [2022-11-15 16:25:17,957 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:25:17,958 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 20 states [2022-11-15 16:25:17,958 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:25:17,959 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 20 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,959 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=38, Invalid=342, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=380 [2022-11-15 16:25:17,959 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,960 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:25:17,962 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 20 states, 20 states have (on average 99.85) internal successors, (1997), 20 states have internal predecessors, (1997), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:25:17,962 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,962 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,962 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,962 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:17,962 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:37,543 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:37,543 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:37,543 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:37,543 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:37,544 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:37,544 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable4 [2022-11-15 16:25:37,544 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:25:37,544 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:25:37,545 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1418198032, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:25:37,545 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:25:37,545 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1949958618] [2022-11-15 16:25:37,546 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:25:37,546 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:25:37,929 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:25:44,419 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 2340 backedges. 1549 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 791 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,419 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:25:44,420 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1949958618] [2022-11-15 16:25:44,420 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1949958618] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:25:44,420 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,420 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [7] imperfect sequences [] total 7 [2022-11-15 16:25:44,420 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [878300404] [2022-11-15 16:25:44,420 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:25:44,422 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 7 states [2022-11-15 16:25:44,422 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:25:44,423 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,423 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=11, Invalid=31, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2022-11-15 16:25:44,423 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,424 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:25:44,426 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 7 states, 7 states have (on average 409.85714285714283) internal successors, (2869), 7 states have internal predecessors, (2869), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:25:44,426 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,426 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,426 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,426 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,426 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2022-11-15 16:25:44,427 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:01,698 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:01,698 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:01,698 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:01,698 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:01,698 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:01,699 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:01,699 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable5 [2022-11-15 16:26:01,699 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:26:01,699 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:26:01,700 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -821612532, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:26:01,700 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:26:01,700 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [443950711] [2022-11-15 16:26:01,700 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:26:01,700 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:26:04,290 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:26:08,505 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,505 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:26:08,506 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [443950711] [2022-11-15 16:26:08,506 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [443950711] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:26:08,506 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,506 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [12] imperfect sequences [] total 12 [2022-11-15 16:26:08,506 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [642124527] [2022-11-15 16:26:08,506 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:26:08,508 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 12 states [2022-11-15 16:26:08,508 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:26:08,508 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 12 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,508 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=21, Invalid=111, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2022-11-15 16:26:08,508 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,510 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:26:08,511 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 12 states, 12 states have (on average 167.41666666666666) internal successors, (2009), 12 states have internal predecessors, (2009), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:26:08,511 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,511 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,511 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,512 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,512 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,512 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:08,512 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,305 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,305 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,305 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,305 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,305 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,305 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,306 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 20 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:29,306 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable6 [2022-11-15 16:26:29,306 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:26:29,306 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:26:29,307 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -181633881, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:26:29,307 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:26:29,307 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1627544675] [2022-11-15 16:26:29,307 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:26:29,308 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:26:29,450 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:26:31,419 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 825 backedges. 101 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 724 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,419 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:26:31,419 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1627544675] [2022-11-15 16:26:31,419 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1627544675] provided 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:26:31,419 INFO L184 FreeRefinementEngine]: Found 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,419 INFO L197 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2022-11-15 16:26:31,420 INFO L121 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1298831308] [2022-11-15 16:26:31,420 INFO L85 oduleStraightlineAll]: Using 1 perfect interpolants to construct interpolant automaton [2022-11-15 16:26:31,422 INFO L571 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has 6 states [2022-11-15 16:26:31,422 INFO L100 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:26:31,422 INFO L143 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,422 INFO L145 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=10, Invalid=20, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2022-11-15 16:26:31,422 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,424 INFO L495 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has currently 0 states, but on-demand construction may add more states [2022-11-15 16:26:31,425 INFO L496 AbstractCegarLoop]: INTERPOLANT automaton has has 6 states, 6 states have (on average 359.5) internal successors, (2157), 6 states have internal predecessors, (2157), 0 states have call successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have return successors, (0), 0 states have call predecessors, (0), 0 states have call successors, (0) [2022-11-15 16:26:31,425 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,425 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,425 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,425 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,425 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,425 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,426 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 20 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:31,426 INFO L154 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to On-DemandConstruction mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,222 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 2 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 36 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 20 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2022-11-15 16:26:53,223 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable7 [2022-11-15 16:26:53,224 INFO L420 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === Targeting ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW === [ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW, ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (and 158 more)] === [2022-11-15 16:26:53,224 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2022-11-15 16:26:53,225 INFO L85 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1444157149, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2022-11-15 16:26:53,225 INFO L118 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy CAMEL [2022-11-15 16:26:53,225 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1519127570] [2022-11-15 16:26:53,225 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:26:53,225 INFO L127 SolverBuilder]: Constructing new instance of SMTInterpol with explicit timeout -1 ms and remaining time -1 ms [2022-11-15 16:27:03,097 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:27:49,673 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 2521 backedges. 1694 proven. 5 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 822 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:27:49,673 INFO L136 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy CAMEL found an infeasible trace [2022-11-15 16:27:49,673 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1519127570] [2022-11-15 16:27:49,673 INFO L157 FreeRefinementEngine]: IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1519127570] provided 0 perfect and 1 imperfect interpolant sequences [2022-11-15 16:27:49,674 INFO L333 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleZ3 [1580729758] [2022-11-15 16:27:49,674 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2022-11-15 16:27:49,674 INFO L173 SolverBuilder]: Constructing external solver with command: z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2022-11-15 16:27:49,674 INFO L189 MonitoredProcess]: No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 [2022-11-15 16:27:49,677 INFO L229 MonitoredProcess]: Starting monitored process 3 with /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) [2022-11-15 16:27:49,678 INFO L327 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (3)] Waiting until timeout for monitored process [2022-11-15 16:27:52,075 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2022-11-15 16:27:52,138 INFO L263 TraceCheckSpWp]: Trace formula consists of 8314 conjuncts, 452 conjunts are in the unsatisfiable core [2022-11-15 16:27:52,229 INFO L286 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing forward predicates... [2022-11-15 16:27:53,171 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 18, result has 35.7 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:27:53,173 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 17 treesize of output 21 [2022-11-15 16:27:53,768 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 12 treesize of output 14 [2022-11-15 16:27:53,953 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:27:53,953 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 12 treesize of output 18 [2022-11-15 16:27:54,347 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 18, result has 35.7 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:27:54,348 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 25 [2022-11-15 16:28:07,155 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 18, result has 35.7 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:07,155 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 25 [2022-11-15 16:28:14,307 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 16 treesize of output 18 [2022-11-15 16:28:14,530 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:14,530 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 16 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:14,941 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:14,941 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 16 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:15,578 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 18, result has 35.7 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:15,578 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 25 [2022-11-15 16:28:30,418 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 18, result has 35.7 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:30,419 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 25 [2022-11-15 16:28:37,385 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 16 treesize of output 18 [2022-11-15 16:28:37,716 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:37,716 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 16 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:39,159 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 10, result has 64.3 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:39,160 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 33 [2022-11-15 16:28:40,446 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 10, result has 64.3 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:40,446 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 33 [2022-11-15 16:28:50,818 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 18, result has 35.7 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:50,819 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 25 [2022-11-15 16:28:53,919 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 27, result has 48.1 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:28:53,919 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 40 treesize of output 45 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,057 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,113 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,141 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,184 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,390 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,414 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,645 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:28:54,713 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:04,292 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:17,578 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:18,177 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:18,347 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:18,590 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:18,976 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:19,304 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 2 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:19,434 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 2 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:23,040 INFO L190 IndexEqualityManager]: detected not equals via solver [2022-11-15 16:29:23,058 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 10, result has 64.3 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:29:23,059 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 2 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 26 treesize of output 41 [2022-11-15 16:29:24,713 INFO L190 IndexEqualityManager]: detected not equals via solver [2022-11-15 16:29:24,725 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 11, result has 45.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:29:24,726 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 2 select indices, 2 select index equivalence classes, 2 disjoint index pairs (out of 1 index pairs), introduced 2 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 21 treesize of output 30 [2022-11-15 16:29:27,886 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 8, result has 52.9 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:29:27,887 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 3 select indices, 3 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 3 index pairs), introduced 3 new quantified variables, introduced 2 case distinctions, treesize of input 20 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:28,627 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 0 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 11 treesize of output 7 [2022-11-15 16:29:28,634 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 0 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 11 treesize of output 7 [2022-11-15 16:29:28,639 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 3 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 18 treesize of output 20 [2022-11-15 16:29:28,749 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 14 treesize of output 16 [2022-11-15 16:29:28,757 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 34 treesize of output 32 [2022-11-15 16:29:28,762 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 2 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 23 treesize of output 22 [2022-11-15 16:29:29,231 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 15 treesize of output 7 [2022-11-15 16:29:29,233 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 35 treesize of output 19 [2022-11-15 16:29:31,560 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 1 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 15 treesize of output 7 [2022-11-15 16:29:31,725 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 2521 backedges. 22 proven. 2483 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 16 trivial. 0 not checked. [2022-11-15 16:29:31,725 INFO L328 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing backward predicates... [2022-11-15 16:29:34,076 WARN L833 $PredicateComparison]: unable to prove that (forall ((v_ArrVal_1984 (Array Int Int)) (v_ArrVal_1982 (Array Int Int)) (v_ArrVal_1983 Int)) (< (select (select (store |c_#memory_int| |c_~#ldv_thread_3~0.base| (store (select |c_#memory_int| |c_~#ldv_thread_3~0.base|) |c_~#ldv_thread_3~0.offset| v_ArrVal_1983)) (select (select (store |c_#memory_$Pointer$.base| |c_~#ldv_thread_3~0.base| v_ArrVal_1984) |c_ldv_insmod_4Thread1of1ForFork1_ldv_dispatch_register_7_4_~cf_arg_3~0#1.base|) |c_ldv_insmod_4Thread1of1ForFork1_ldv_dispatch_register_7_4_~cf_arg_3~0#1.offset|)) (+ (select (select (store |c_#memory_$Pointer$.offset| |c_~#ldv_thread_3~0.base| v_ArrVal_1982) |c_ldv_insmod_4Thread1of1ForFork1_ldv_dispatch_register_7_4_~cf_arg_3~0#1.base|) |c_ldv_insmod_4Thread1of1ForFork1_ldv_dispatch_register_7_4_~cf_arg_3~0#1.offset|) 6128204)) 2147483645)) is different from false [2022-11-15 16:29:34,094 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:29:34,094 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 53 treesize of output 54 [2022-11-15 16:29:34,097 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 100 treesize of output 92 [2022-11-15 16:29:34,112 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 44 treesize of output 42 [2022-11-15 16:29:34,117 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:29:34,118 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 86 treesize of output 78 [2022-11-15 16:29:34,119 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 2, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 142 treesize of output 130 [2022-11-15 16:29:34,122 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 0 stores, 1 select indices, 1 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 0 case distinctions, treesize of input 126 treesize of output 122 [2022-11-15 16:29:45,671 WARN L233 SmtUtils]: Spent 10.21s on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 50 DAG size of output: 30 (called from [L 360] de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.lib.modelcheckerutils.smt.predicates.PredicateUnifier.getOrConstructPredicate) [2022-11-15 16:29:51,678 INFO L321 Elim1Store]: treesize reduction 0, result has 100.0 percent of original size [2022-11-15 16:29:51,679 INFO L350 Elim1Store]: Elim1 eliminated variable of array dimension 1, 1 stores, 0 select indices, 0 select index equivalence classes, 0 disjoint index pairs (out of 0 index pairs), introduced 1 new quantified variables, introduced 1 case distinctions, treesize of input 15 treesize of output 19 Received shutdown request... [2022-11-15 16:30:01,918 WARN L340 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (1)] Timeout while monitored process is still running, waiting 1000 ms for graceful end [2022-11-15 16:30:01,918 WARN L340 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (3)] Timeout while monitored process is still running, waiting 1000 ms for graceful end [2022-11-15 16:30:01,918 WARN L340 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -t:1000 (2)] Timeout while monitored process is still running, waiting 1000 ms for graceful end [2022-11-15 16:30:02,187 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (159 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,210 INFO L552 MonitoredProcess]: [MP /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (3)] Ended with exit code 0 [2022-11-15 16:30:02,396 WARN L477 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: 3 /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true,SelfDestructingSolverStorable8 [2022-11-15 16:30:02,397 WARN L619 AbstractCegarLoop]: Verification canceled: while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,398 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err152ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (158 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,398 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err153ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (157 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,398 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err92ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (156 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,398 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err93ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (155 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err154ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (154 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err155ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (153 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err94ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (152 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err156ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (151 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err95ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (150 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err157ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (149 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err96ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (148 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err97ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (147 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err158ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (146 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err159ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (145 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err98ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (144 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err99ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (143 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,399 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err100ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (142 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err101ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (141 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err102ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (140 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err103ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (139 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err104ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (138 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err105ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (137 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err60ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (136 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err61ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (135 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err106ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (134 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err107ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (133 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err1ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (132 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err108ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (131 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err109ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (130 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,400 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err110ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (129 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err2ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (128 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err111ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (127 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err3ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (126 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err112ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (125 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err4ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (124 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err86ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (123 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err113ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (122 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err5ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (121 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err87ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (120 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err114ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (119 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err115ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (118 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err88ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (117 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,401 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err89ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (116 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err6ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (115 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err7ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (114 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err116ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (113 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err117ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (112 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err8ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (111 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err90ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (110 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err9ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (109 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err91ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (108 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err10ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (107 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err11ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (106 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err12ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (105 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err13ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (104 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err62ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (103 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,402 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err63ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (102 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err14ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (101 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err15ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (100 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err64ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (99 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err65ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (98 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err16ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (97 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err17ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (96 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err118ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (95 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err119ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (94 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err66ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (93 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err67ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (92 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err18ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (91 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err19ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (90 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,403 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err120ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (89 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err148ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (88 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err121ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (87 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err149ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (86 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err20ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (85 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err21ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (84 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err150ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (83 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err151ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (82 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err68ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (81 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err69ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (80 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err22ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (79 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err23ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (78 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err70ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (77 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err71ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (76 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,404 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err24ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (75 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err25ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (74 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err122ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (73 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err123ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (72 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err72ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (71 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err73ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (70 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err124ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (69 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err125ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (68 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err74ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (67 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err75ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (66 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err126ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (65 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err127ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (64 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,405 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err76ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (63 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err77ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (62 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err128ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (61 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err129ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (60 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err130ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (59 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err131ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (58 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err78ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (57 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err79ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (56 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err26ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (55 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err27ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (54 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err132ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (53 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err133ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (52 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err80ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (51 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,406 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err81ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (50 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err28ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (49 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err56ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (48 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err29ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (47 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err57ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (46 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err134ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (45 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err135ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (44 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err58ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (43 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err59ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (42 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err82ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (41 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err83ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (40 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err84ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (39 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err85ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (38 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err30ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (37 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,407 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err31ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (36 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err136ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (35 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err137ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (34 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err32ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (33 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err33ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (32 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err138ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (31 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err139ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (30 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err34ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (29 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err35ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (28 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err140ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (27 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err141ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (26 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err36ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (25 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err37ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (24 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,408 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err142ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (23 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err143ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (22 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err38ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (21 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err39ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (20 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err144ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (19 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err145ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (18 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err40ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (17 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err41ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (16 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err146ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (15 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err147ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (14 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err42ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (13 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err43ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (12 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err44ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (11 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,409 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err45ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (10 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err46ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (9 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err47ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (8 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err48ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (7 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err49ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (6 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err50ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (5 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err51ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (4 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err52ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (3 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err53ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (2 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err54ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (1 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,410 INFO L805 garLoopResultBuilder]: Registering result TIMEOUT for location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Err55ASSERT_VIOLATIONINTEGER_OVERFLOW (0 of 160 remaining) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,417 INFO L444 BasicCegarLoop]: Path program histogram: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2022-11-15 16:30:02,419 INFO L307 ceAbstractionStarter]: Result for error location ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Thread1of1ForFork2 was TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT,TIMEOUT (1/4) [2022-11-15 16:30:02,434 INFO L228 ceAbstractionStarter]: Analysis of concurrent program completed with 1 thread instances [2022-11-15 16:30:02,434 INFO L178 ceAbstractionStarter]: Computing trace abstraction results [2022-11-15 16:30:02,437 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction CFG 15.11 04:30:02 BasicIcfg [2022-11-15 16:30:02,437 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2022-11-15 16:30:02,438 INFO L158 Benchmark]: Toolchain (without parser) took 806492.58ms. Allocated memory was 178.3MB in the beginning and 3.2GB in the end (delta: 3.1GB). Free memory was 138.8MB in the beginning and 1.9GB in the end (delta: -1.7GB). Peak memory consumption was 1.3GB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,438 INFO L158 Benchmark]: CDTParser took 0.13ms. Allocated memory is still 178.3MB. Free memory was 135.1MB in the beginning and 135.0MB in the end (delta: 73.0kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,438 INFO L158 Benchmark]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 1872.81ms. Allocated memory was 178.3MB in the beginning and 226.5MB in the end (delta: 48.2MB). Free memory was 138.8MB in the beginning and 160.4MB in the end (delta: -21.6MB). Peak memory consumption was 106.5MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,440 INFO L158 Benchmark]: Boogie Procedure Inliner took 207.39ms. Allocated memory is still 226.5MB. Free memory was 160.4MB in the beginning and 121.0MB in the end (delta: 39.3MB). Peak memory consumption was 38.8MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,440 INFO L158 Benchmark]: Boogie Preprocessor took 248.92ms. Allocated memory is still 226.5MB. Free memory was 121.0MB in the beginning and 138.7MB in the end (delta: -17.7MB). Peak memory consumption was 48.9MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,440 INFO L158 Benchmark]: RCFGBuilder took 4777.23ms. Allocated memory was 226.5MB in the beginning and 398.5MB in the end (delta: 172.0MB). Free memory was 138.7MB in the beginning and 120.9MB in the end (delta: 17.8MB). Peak memory consumption was 189.8MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,440 INFO L158 Benchmark]: TraceAbstraction took 799337.72ms. Allocated memory was 593.5MB in the beginning and 3.2GB in the end (delta: 2.6GB). Free memory was 477.0MB in the beginning and 1.9GB in the end (delta: -1.4GB). Peak memory consumption was 1.3GB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. [2022-11-15 16:30:02,442 INFO L339 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### End [Toolchain 1] ####################### --- Results --- * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.core: - StatisticsResult: Toolchain Benchmarks Benchmark results are: * CDTParser took 0.13ms. Allocated memory is still 178.3MB. Free memory was 135.1MB in the beginning and 135.0MB in the end (delta: 73.0kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 1872.81ms. Allocated memory was 178.3MB in the beginning and 226.5MB in the end (delta: 48.2MB). Free memory was 138.8MB in the beginning and 160.4MB in the end (delta: -21.6MB). Peak memory consumption was 106.5MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * Boogie Procedure Inliner took 207.39ms. Allocated memory is still 226.5MB. Free memory was 160.4MB in the beginning and 121.0MB in the end (delta: 39.3MB). Peak memory consumption was 38.8MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * Boogie Preprocessor took 248.92ms. Allocated memory is still 226.5MB. Free memory was 121.0MB in the beginning and 138.7MB in the end (delta: -17.7MB). Peak memory consumption was 48.9MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * RCFGBuilder took 4777.23ms. Allocated memory was 226.5MB in the beginning and 398.5MB in the end (delta: 172.0MB). Free memory was 138.7MB in the beginning and 120.9MB in the end (delta: 17.8MB). Peak memory consumption was 189.8MB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * TraceAbstraction took 799337.72ms. Allocated memory was 593.5MB in the beginning and 3.2GB in the end (delta: 2.6GB). Free memory was 477.0MB in the beginning and 1.9GB in the end (delta: -1.4GB). Peak memory consumption was 1.3GB. Max. memory is 8.0GB. * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #1 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 2291507, independent: 2291424, independent conditional: 334, independent unconditional: 2291090, dependent: 82, dependent conditional: 56, dependent unconditional: 26, unknown: 1, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 2284038, Positive cache size: 2284012, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 2284012, Negative cache size: 26, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 26, Unknown cache size: 1, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 1, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 56, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #2 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 10295384, independent: 10295263, independent conditional: 2253, independent unconditional: 10293010, dependent: 120, dependent conditional: 95, dependent unconditional: 25, unknown: 1, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 10337072, Positive cache size: 10337045, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 10337045, Negative cache size: 27, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 27, Unknown cache size: 1, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 1, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 151, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #3 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 10692059, independent: 10691832, independent conditional: 3154, independent unconditional: 10688678, dependent: 201, dependent conditional: 160, dependent unconditional: 41, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 11567902, Positive cache size: 11567859, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 11567859, Negative cache size: 43, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 43, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 311, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #4 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11135876, independent: 11135631, independent conditional: 3442, independent unconditional: 11132189, dependent: 219, dependent conditional: 176, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12076348, Positive cache size: 12076301, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12076301, Negative cache size: 47, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 47, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 487, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #5 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11185518, independent: 11185154, independent conditional: 5077, independent unconditional: 11180077, dependent: 338, dependent conditional: 295, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12279956, Positive cache size: 12279909, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12279909, Negative cache size: 47, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 47, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 782, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #6 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11266200, independent: 11265632, independent conditional: 7737, independent unconditional: 11257895, dependent: 542, dependent conditional: 499, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12750636, Positive cache size: 12750585, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12750585, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 1281, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #7 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11270599, independent: 11269669, independent conditional: 11774, independent unconditional: 11257895, dependent: 904, dependent conditional: 861, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12852858, Positive cache size: 12852807, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12852807, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 2142, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #8 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11298182, independent: 11296535, independent conditional: 20682, independent unconditional: 11275853, dependent: 1621, dependent conditional: 1578, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 13301252, Positive cache size: 13301201, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 13301201, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 3720, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Independence relation #9 benchmarks IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11346582, independent: 11344000, independent conditional: 32231, independent unconditional: 11311769, dependent: 2556, dependent conditional: 2513, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 13337168, Positive cache size: 13337117, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 13337117, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 6233, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 375.0s, Number of persistent set computation: 2095, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1817, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 2291117, independent: 2291090, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 2291090, dependent: 26, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 26, unknown: 1, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 2291507, independent: 2291424, independent conditional: 334, independent unconditional: 2291090, dependent: 82, dependent conditional: 56, dependent unconditional: 26, unknown: 1, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 2284038, Positive cache size: 2284012, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 2284012, Negative cache size: 26, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 26, Unknown cache size: 1, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 1, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 56, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 25.1s, Number of persistent set computation: 2088, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1810, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 10293036, independent: 10293010, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 10293010, dependent: 25, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 25, unknown: 1, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 10295384, independent: 10295263, independent conditional: 2253, independent unconditional: 10293010, dependent: 120, dependent conditional: 95, dependent unconditional: 25, unknown: 1, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 1] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 10337072, Positive cache size: 10337045, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 10337045, Negative cache size: 27, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 27, Unknown cache size: 1, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 1, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 151, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 48.0s, Number of persistent set computation: 2164, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1886, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 10688745, independent: 10688678, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 10688678, dependent: 41, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 41, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 10692059, independent: 10691832, independent conditional: 3154, independent unconditional: 10688678, dependent: 201, dependent conditional: 160, dependent unconditional: 41, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 11567902, Positive cache size: 11567859, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 11567859, Negative cache size: 43, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 43, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 311, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 20.2s, Number of persistent set computation: 2233, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1955, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 11132258, independent: 11132189, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 11132189, dependent: 43, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11135876, independent: 11135631, independent conditional: 3442, independent unconditional: 11132189, dependent: 219, dependent conditional: 176, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12076348, Positive cache size: 12076301, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12076301, Negative cache size: 47, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 47, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 487, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 20.5s, Number of persistent set computation: 2242, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1964, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 11180146, independent: 11180077, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 11180077, dependent: 43, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11185518, independent: 11185154, independent conditional: 5077, independent unconditional: 11180077, dependent: 338, dependent conditional: 295, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12279956, Positive cache size: 12279909, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12279909, Negative cache size: 47, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 47, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 782, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 18.1s, Number of persistent set computation: 2254, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1976, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 11257964, independent: 11257895, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 11257895, dependent: 43, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11266200, independent: 11265632, independent conditional: 7737, independent unconditional: 11257895, dependent: 542, dependent conditional: 499, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12750636, Positive cache size: 12750585, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12750585, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 1281, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 16.7s, Number of persistent set computation: 2254, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1976, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 11257964, independent: 11257895, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 11257895, dependent: 43, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11270599, independent: 11269669, independent conditional: 11774, independent unconditional: 11257895, dependent: 904, dependent conditional: 861, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 12852858, Positive cache size: 12852807, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 12852807, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 2142, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 19.4s, Number of persistent set computation: 2256, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1978, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 11275922, independent: 11275853, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 11275853, dependent: 43, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11298182, independent: 11296535, independent conditional: 20682, independent unconditional: 11275853, dependent: 1621, dependent conditional: 1578, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 13301252, Positive cache size: 13301201, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 13301201, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 3720, Statistics for Abstraction: - StatisticsResult: Persistent set benchmarks Persistent set computation time: 20.3s, Number of persistent set computation: 2261, Number of trivial persistent sets: 1983, Underlying independence relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 11311838, independent: 11311769, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 11311769, dependent: 43, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Independence Queries: [ total: 11346582, independent: 11344000, independent conditional: 32231, independent unconditional: 11311769, dependent: 2556, dependent conditional: 2513, dependent unconditional: 43, unknown: 26, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 26] , IndependenceRelationWithAbstraction.Statistics on underlying relation: ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90781907, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 6583, dependent conditional: 6233, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ThreadSeparatingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 86684, independent unconditional: 90688456, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , DisjunctiveConditionalIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticConditionEliminator.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , SemanticConditionEliminator.Statistics on underlying relation: CachedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 90775140, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 90775140, dependent: 350, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 350, unknown: 184, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 184] , CachedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: UnionIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337117, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337117, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , UnionIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relations: [ SyntacticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 13337195, independent: 13337047, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 13337047, dependent: 148, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 148, unknown: 0, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 0] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ProtectedIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , ConditionTransformingIndependenceRelation.Statistics on underlying relation: SemanticIndependenceRelation.Independence Queries: [ total: 148, independent: 70, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 70, dependent: 51, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 51, unknown: 27, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 27] , SemanticIndependenceRelation.Query Time [ms]: [ total: 29274, independent: 487, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 487, dependent: 756, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 756, unknown: 28031, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 28031] , Protected Queries: 0 ], Cache Queries: [ total: 90775674, independent: 77438023, independent conditional: 0, independent unconditional: 77438023, dependent: 299, dependent conditional: 0, dependent unconditional: 299, unknown: 13337352, unknown conditional: 0, unknown unconditional: 13337352] , Statistics on independence cache: Total cache size (in pairs): 13337168, Positive cache size: 13337117, Positive conditional cache size: 0, Positive unconditional cache size: 13337117, Negative cache size: 51, Negative conditional cache size: 0, Negative unconditional cache size: 51, Unknown cache size: 27, Unknown conditional cache size: 0, Unknown unconditional cache size: 27, Eliminated conditions: 0, Maximal queried relation: 0, Independence queries for same thread: 6233, Statistics for Abstraction: - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6548]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 7305]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 7305]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6548]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6548]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 7307]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 7307]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6550]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6550]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 7314]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 7314]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6552]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6552]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6642]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6642]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6710]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6710]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6548]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6644]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6644]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6646]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6550]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6646]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6550]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6647]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6647]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6743]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6743]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6648]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6648]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6552]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6748]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6552]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6748]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6642]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6642]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6735]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6735]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6644]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6644]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6766]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6766]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6654]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6659]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6654]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6659]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6646]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6646]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6663]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6663]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6647]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6647]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6768]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6768]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6648]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6648]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6924]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6924]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6769]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6769]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6926]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6926]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6771]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6771]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6927]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6927]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6929]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6929]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6775]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6775]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6654]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6659]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6654]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6659]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6930]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6930]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6663]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6663]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6776]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6776]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6777]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6777]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6924]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6924]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6935]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6935]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6926]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6926]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6927]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6927]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6942]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6942]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6943]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6943]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6929]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6929]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6944]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6944]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6930]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6930]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6935]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6935]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6211]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6942]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6942]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6943]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6943]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6944]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - TimeoutResultAtElement [Line: 6944]: Timeout (TraceAbstraction) Unable to prove that integer overflow can never occur Cancelled while PartialOrderCegarLoop was analyzing trace of length 3761 with TraceHistMax 3,while TraceCheckSpWp was constructing backward predicates,while PredicateComparison was comparing new predicate (quantified with 0quantifier alternations) to 188 known predicates. - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data for errors in thread instance: ldv_random_allocationless_scenario_3Thread1of1ForFork2 with 1 thread instances CFG has 7 procedures, 18617 locations, 1125 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. OverallTime: 798.2s, OverallIterations: 9, TraceHistogramMax: 0, PathProgramHistogramMax: 1, EmptinessCheckTime: 570.9s, AutomataDifference: 0.0s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 0.2s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: , PredicateUnifierStatistics: No data available, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=0occurred in iteration=0, InterpolantAutomatonStates: 105, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: No data available, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.3s SsaConstructionTime, 4.3s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 32.6s InterpolantComputationTime, 18239 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 18239 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 8 NumberOfCheckSat, 18231 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 25038 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 8 InterpolantComputations, 8 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 3165/3165 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available RESULT: Ultimate could not prove your program: Timeout Completed graceful shutdown