java -Xmx8000000000 -Xss4m -jar ./plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.3.100.v20150511-1540.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata ./data -tc ../../../trunk/examples/toolchains/AutomizerC.xml -s ../../../trunk/examples/settings/default/automizer/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Automizer_Default.epf --traceabstraction.trace.refinement.strategy SIFA_TAIPAN --sifa.abstract.domain CompoundDomain --rcfgbuilder.size.of.a.code.block LoopFreeBlock --sifa.call.summarizer TopInputCallSummarizer --sifa.fluid SizeLimitFluid --sifa.simplification.technique SIMPLIFY_QUICK -i ../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.16-rc1/205_9a_array_unsafes_linux-3.16-rc1.tar.xz-205_9a-drivers--net--ieee802154--mrf24j40.ko-entry_point.cil.out.i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is Ultimate 0.1.24-36ac518-m [2019-10-07 09:06:12,526 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,529 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,551 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,552 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,554 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,556 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,566 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,572 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,575 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,576 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,577 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,579 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,580 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,583 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,584 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,586 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,587 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,589 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,594 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,599 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,602 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,604 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,605 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,608 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,608 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,609 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,611 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,612 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,613 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,613 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,615 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,616 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,617 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,618 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,619 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,619 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,619 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,620 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,620 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 09:06:12,622 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,623 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/settings/default/automizer/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Automizer_Default.epf [2019-10-07 09:06:12,656 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2019-10-07 09:06:12,656 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2019-10-07 09:06:12,661 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of BlockEncodingV2 differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 09:06:12,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Create parallel compositions if possible=false [2019-10-07 09:06:12,661 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use SBE=true [2019-10-07 09:06:12,662 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 09:06:12,662 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2019-10-07 09:06:12,662 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2019-10-07 09:06:12,662 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2019-10-07 09:06:12,662 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2019-10-07 09:06:12,663 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2019-10-07 09:06:12,663 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2019-10-07 09:06:12,663 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2019-10-07 09:06:12,665 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2019-10-07 09:06:12,666 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2019-10-07 09:06:12,666 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2019-10-07 09:06:12,666 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2019-10-07 09:06:12,666 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 09:06:12,666 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Size of a code block=SequenceOfStatements [2019-10-07 09:06:12,667 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * To the following directory=./dump/ [2019-10-07 09:06:12,667 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2019-10-07 09:06:12,667 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2019-10-07 09:06:12,667 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 09:06:12,667 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2019-10-07 09:06:12,668 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2019-10-07 09:06:12,668 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=CAMEL [2019-10-07 09:06:12,668 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2019-10-07 09:06:12,668 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2019-10-07 09:06:12,668 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: Trace refinement strategy -> SIFA_TAIPAN Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Abstract Domain -> CompoundDomain Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder: Size of a code block -> LoopFreeBlock Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Call Summarizer -> TopInputCallSummarizer Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Fluid -> SizeLimitFluid Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Simplification Technique -> SIMPLIFY_QUICK [2019-10-07 09:06:12,959 INFO L81 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2019-10-07 09:06:12,973 INFO L258 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2019-10-07 09:06:12,977 INFO L214 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2019-10-07 09:06:12,979 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2019-10-07 09:06:12,979 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2019-10-07 09:06:12,980 INFO L428 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.16-rc1/205_9a_array_unsafes_linux-3.16-rc1.tar.xz-205_9a-drivers--net--ieee802154--mrf24j40.ko-entry_point.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 09:06:13,059 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/591e825dc/c984c02921d34e6d8b4b279e0fbb33cf/FLAG282081b5f [2019-10-07 09:06:13,892 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2019-10-07 09:06:13,892 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /storage/repos/ultimate/trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.16-rc1/205_9a_array_unsafes_linux-3.16-rc1.tar.xz-205_9a-drivers--net--ieee802154--mrf24j40.ko-entry_point.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 09:06:13,941 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/591e825dc/c984c02921d34e6d8b4b279e0fbb33cf/FLAG282081b5f [2019-10-07 09:06:14,413 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/591e825dc/c984c02921d34e6d8b4b279e0fbb33cf [2019-10-07 09:06:14,423 INFO L296 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2019-10-07 09:06:14,425 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 4 elements. [2019-10-07 09:06:14,425 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2019-10-07 09:06:14,426 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2019-10-07 09:06:14,429 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2019-10-07 09:06:14,431 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 07.10 09:06:14" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:14,434 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@71858a8 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:14, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 09:06:14,434 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 07.10 09:06:14" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:14,441 INFO L142 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2019-10-07 09:06:14,578 INFO L173 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2019-10-07 09:06:16,483 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2019-10-07 09:06:16,519 INFO L188 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2019-10-07 09:06:17,039 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2019-10-07 09:06:17,213 INFO L192 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2019-10-07 09:06:17,213 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17 WrapperNode [2019-10-07 09:06:17,213 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2019-10-07 09:06:17,214 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2019-10-07 09:06:17,214 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,214 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2019-10-07 09:06:17,229 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,229 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,282 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,283 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,395 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,413 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,434 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,463 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2019-10-07 09:06:17,464 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2019-10-07 09:06:17,464 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2019-10-07 09:06:17,464 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2019-10-07 09:06:17,467 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (1/1) ... No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,546 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,546 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2019-10-07 09:06:17,547 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure INIT_LIST_HEAD [2019-10-07 09:06:17,547 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __list_add [2019-10-07 09:06:17,547 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure list_add_tail [2019-10-07 09:06:17,547 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure init_completion [2019-10-07 09:06:17,547 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure reinit_completion [2019-10-07 09:06:17,548 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobject_name [2019-10-07 09:06:17,548 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure devm_kzalloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,548 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_name [2019-10-07 09:06:17,548 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_get_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,548 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_set_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,549 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_malloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,549 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_zalloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,549 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_undef_int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,549 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_undef_ptr [2019-10-07 09:06:17,549 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_undef_ulong [2019-10-07 09:06:17,550 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_error [2019-10-07 09:06:17,550 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_stop [2019-10-07 09:06:17,550 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv__builtin_expect [2019-10-07 09:06:17,550 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv__builtin_trap [2019-10-07 09:06:17,550 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spi_set_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,551 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spi_get_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,551 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spi_unregister_driver [2019-10-07 09:06:17,551 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spi_message_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,551 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spi_message_add_tail [2019-10-07 09:06:17,551 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spi_sync [2019-10-07 09:06:17,551 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure write_short_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,552 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure read_short_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,552 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure read_long_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,552 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure write_long_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,552 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure write_tx_buf [2019-10-07 09:06:17,552 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_read_rx_buf [2019-10-07 09:06:17,552 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_tx [2019-10-07 09:06:17,553 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_ed [2019-10-07 09:06:17,553 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_start [2019-10-07 09:06:17,553 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_stop [2019-10-07 09:06:17,553 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_set_channel [2019-10-07 09:06:17,553 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_filter [2019-10-07 09:06:17,553 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_handle_rx [2019-10-07 09:06:17,554 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_isr [2019-10-07 09:06:17,554 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_probe [2019-10-07 09:06:17,554 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_remove [2019-10-07 09:06:17,554 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_driver_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,554 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mrf24j40_driver_exit [2019-10-07 09:06:17,554 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure choose_interrupt_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,554 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure disable_suitable_irq_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,555 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_initialize_ieee802154_ops_4 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,555 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure activate_suitable_irq_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,555 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure disable_suitable_irq_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,555 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure reg_check_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,555 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure activate_suitable_irq_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,556 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_irq_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,556 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_initialize_spi_driver_3 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,556 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_irq_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,556 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure choose_interrupt_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,556 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure reg_check_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,556 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure main [2019-10-07 09:06:17,557 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_consume_skb_5 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,557 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_6 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,557 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_7 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,557 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_8 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,557 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_devm_request_threaded_irq_11 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,557 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_12 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,558 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_alloc_skb_13 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,558 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_14 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,558 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_devm_request_threaded_irq_15 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,558 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_set_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,558 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_set_add [2019-10-07 09:06:17,558 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_set_remove [2019-10-07 09:06:17,558 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_set_contains [2019-10-07 09:06:17,559 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_set_is_empty [2019-10-07 09:06:17,559 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_is_err [2019-10-07 09:06:17,559 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_err_ptr [2019-10-07 09:06:17,559 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_ptr_err [2019-10-07 09:06:17,559 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_is_err_or_null [2019-10-07 09:06:17,559 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_skb_alloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,559 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_initialize [2019-10-07 09:06:17,560 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_skb_free [2019-10-07 09:06:17,560 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_skb_free_int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,560 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_dev_alloc_skb [2019-10-07 09:06:17,560 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_netdev_alloc_skb [2019-10-07 09:06:17,560 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_skb_current [2019-10-07 09:06:17,560 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_check_final_state [2019-10-07 09:06:17,561 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __const_udelay [2019-10-07 09:06:17,561 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __dynamic_dev_dbg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,561 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __init_waitqueue_head [2019-10-07 09:06:17,561 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __mutex_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,561 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure complete [2019-10-07 09:06:17,561 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_err [2019-10-07 09:06:17,562 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_warn [2019-10-07 09:06:17,562 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure devm_kmalloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,562 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure devm_request_threaded_irq [2019-10-07 09:06:17,562 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure driver_unregister [2019-10-07 09:06:17,562 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ieee802154_alloc_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,562 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ieee802154_free_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,563 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ieee802154_register_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,563 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ieee802154_rx_irqsafe [2019-10-07 09:06:17,563 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ieee802154_unregister_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,563 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_handler1_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,563 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_handler1_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,563 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mutex_lock_nested [2019-10-07 09:06:17,563 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure mutex_unlock [2019-10-07 09:06:17,564 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure printk [2019-10-07 09:06:17,564 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure skb_put [2019-10-07 09:06:17,564 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure skb_trim [2019-10-07 09:06:17,564 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spi_register_driver [2019-10-07 09:06:17,564 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout [2019-10-07 09:06:17,564 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure warn_slowpath_null [2019-10-07 09:06:17,565 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure external_alloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,565 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kfree [2019-10-07 09:06:17,565 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure #Ultimate.C_memset [2019-10-07 09:06:17,565 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure #Ultimate.meminit [2019-10-07 09:06:17,565 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure #Ultimate.C_memcpy [2019-10-07 09:06:17,565 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_error [2019-10-07 09:06:17,566 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv__builtin_expect [2019-10-07 09:06:17,566 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure printk [2019-10-07 09:06:17,566 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __dynamic_dev_dbg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,566 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure INIT_LIST_HEAD [2019-10-07 09:06:17,566 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 09:06:17,566 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __list_add [2019-10-07 09:06:17,567 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure list_add_tail [2019-10-07 09:06:17,567 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 09:06:17,567 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure warn_slowpath_null [2019-10-07 09:06:17,567 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure memcpy [2019-10-07 09:06:17,567 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure memset [2019-10-07 09:06:17,567 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __init_waitqueue_head [2019-10-07 09:06:17,567 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure init_completion [2019-10-07 09:06:17,568 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2019-10-07 09:06:17,568 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,568 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,568 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure reinit_completion [2019-10-07 09:06:17,568 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout [2019-10-07 09:06:17,568 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure complete [2019-10-07 09:06:17,569 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __mutex_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,569 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mutex_lock_nested [2019-10-07 09:06:17,569 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mutex_unlock [2019-10-07 09:06:17,569 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobject_name [2019-10-07 09:06:17,569 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure driver_unregister [2019-10-07 09:06:17,569 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure devm_kmalloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,570 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure devm_kzalloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,570 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_name [2019-10-07 09:06:17,570 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_get_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,570 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_set_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,570 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_err [2019-10-07 09:06:17,570 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_warn [2019-10-07 09:06:17,570 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_6 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,571 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_7 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,571 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_8 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,571 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_12 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,571 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_kfree_skb_14 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,571 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_consume_skb_5 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,571 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_alloc_skb_13 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,572 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure skb_put [2019-10-07 09:06:17,572 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure skb_trim [2019-10-07 09:06:17,572 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_skb_alloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,572 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_skb_free [2019-10-07 09:06:17,572 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure malloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,572 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure calloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,572 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,573 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_ulong [2019-10-07 09:06:17,573 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_pointer [2019-10-07 09:06:17,573 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_assume [2019-10-07 09:06:17,573 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_malloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,573 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnHeap [2019-10-07 09:06:17,573 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_zalloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,573 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.meminit [2019-10-07 09:06:17,574 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_undef_int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,574 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_undef_ptr [2019-10-07 09:06:17,574 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_undef_ulong [2019-10-07 09:06:17,574 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_error [2019-10-07 09:06:17,574 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_stop [2019-10-07 09:06:17,574 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv__builtin_trap [2019-10-07 09:06:17,574 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure choose_interrupt_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,575 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure disable_suitable_irq_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,575 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_initialize_ieee802154_ops_4 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,575 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure activate_suitable_irq_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,575 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure disable_suitable_irq_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,575 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure reg_check_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,575 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure activate_suitable_irq_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,576 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_irq_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,576 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_initialize_spi_driver_3 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,576 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_irq_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,576 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure choose_interrupt_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,576 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure reg_check_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,576 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spi_set_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,576 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spi_get_drvdata [2019-10-07 09:06:17,577 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spi_register_driver [2019-10-07 09:06:17,577 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spi_unregister_driver [2019-10-07 09:06:17,577 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spi_message_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,577 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.C_memset [2019-10-07 09:06:17,577 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spi_message_add_tail [2019-10-07 09:06:17,577 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spi_sync [2019-10-07 09:06:17,577 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,578 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure devm_request_threaded_irq [2019-10-07 09:06:17,578 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_devm_request_threaded_irq_11 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,578 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_devm_request_threaded_irq_15 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,578 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __const_udelay [2019-10-07 09:06:17,578 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ieee802154_alloc_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,578 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ieee802154_free_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,578 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ieee802154_register_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,579 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ieee802154_unregister_device [2019-10-07 09:06:17,579 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ieee802154_rx_irqsafe [2019-10-07 09:06:17,579 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write_short_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,579 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read_short_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,579 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read_long_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,579 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write_long_reg [2019-10-07 09:06:17,579 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write_tx_buf [2019-10-07 09:06:17,580 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_read_rx_buf [2019-10-07 09:06:17,580 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_tx [2019-10-07 09:06:17,580 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_ed [2019-10-07 09:06:17,580 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_start [2019-10-07 09:06:17,580 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_stop [2019-10-07 09:06:17,580 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_set_channel [2019-10-07 09:06:17,581 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_filter [2019-10-07 09:06:17,581 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.C_memcpy [2019-10-07 09:06:17,581 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_handle_rx [2019-10-07 09:06:17,581 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_isr [2019-10-07 09:06:17,581 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_probe [2019-10-07 09:06:17,581 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_remove [2019-10-07 09:06:17,581 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_driver_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,582 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure mrf24j40_driver_exit [2019-10-07 09:06:17,582 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_handler1_1 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,582 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_initialize [2019-10-07 09:06:17,582 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_check_final_state [2019-10-07 09:06:17,582 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_handler1_2 [2019-10-07 09:06:17,582 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure main [2019-10-07 09:06:17,582 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_set_init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_set_add [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_set_remove [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_set_contains [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_set_is_empty [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_is_err [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_err_ptr [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_ptr_err [2019-10-07 09:06:17,583 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_is_err_or_null [2019-10-07 09:06:17,584 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_skb_free_int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,584 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_netdev_alloc_skb [2019-10-07 09:06:17,584 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_dev_alloc_skb [2019-10-07 09:06:17,584 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_skb_current [2019-10-07 09:06:17,584 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure external_alloc [2019-10-07 09:06:17,584 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_long [2019-10-07 09:06:17,584 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure free [2019-10-07 09:06:17,585 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kfree [2019-10-07 09:06:17,585 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.init [2019-10-07 09:06:17,585 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,585 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 09:06:17,585 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~unchecked~int [2019-10-07 09:06:17,585 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2019-10-07 09:06:17,585 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~unchecked~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 09:06:17,586 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~unchecked~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 09:06:17,586 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~unchecked~int [2019-10-07 09:06:22,006 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint ldv_stopFINAL: assume true; [2019-10-07 09:06:52,679 INFO L279 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2019-10-07 09:06:52,680 INFO L284 CfgBuilder]: Removed 6 assume(true) statements. [2019-10-07 09:06:52,682 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 07.10 09:06:52 BoogieIcfgContainer [2019-10-07 09:06:52,682 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2019-10-07 09:06:52,684 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2019-10-07 09:06:52,684 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2019-10-07 09:06:52,687 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2019-10-07 09:06:52,687 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 07.10 09:06:14" (1/3) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:52,688 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@23b5bf68 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 07.10 09:06:52, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 09:06:52,689 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 09:06:17" (2/3) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:52,689 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@23b5bf68 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 07.10 09:06:52, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 09:06:52,689 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 07.10 09:06:52" (3/3) ... [2019-10-07 09:06:52,691 INFO L109 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG 205_9a_array_unsafes_linux-3.16-rc1.tar.xz-205_9a-drivers--net--ieee802154--mrf24j40.ko-entry_point.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 09:06:52,702 INFO L152 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:true NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2019-10-07 09:06:52,712 INFO L164 ceAbstractionStarter]: Appying trace abstraction to program that has 1 error locations. [2019-10-07 09:06:52,724 INFO L249 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 1 error locations. [2019-10-07 09:06:52,758 INFO L373 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interprodecural is true [2019-10-07 09:06:52,759 INFO L374 AbstractCegarLoop]: Hoare is true [2019-10-07 09:06:52,759 INFO L375 AbstractCegarLoop]: Compute interpolants for FPandBP [2019-10-07 09:06:52,759 INFO L376 AbstractCegarLoop]: Backedges is STRAIGHT_LINE [2019-10-07 09:06:52,759 INFO L377 AbstractCegarLoop]: Determinization is PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2019-10-07 09:06:52,759 INFO L378 AbstractCegarLoop]: Difference is false [2019-10-07 09:06:52,760 INFO L379 AbstractCegarLoop]: Minimize is MINIMIZE_SEVPA [2019-10-07 09:06:52,760 INFO L383 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0==of CEGAR loop == AllErrorsAtOnce======== [2019-10-07 09:06:52,797 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 710 states. [2019-10-07 09:06:52,814 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 56 [2019-10-07 09:06:52,814 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:06:52,816 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [3, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:06:52,818 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:06:52,824 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:06:52,824 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -138474442, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:06:52,834 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:06:52,834 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:06:52,835 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:06:52,835 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:06:52,835 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:06:53,323 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:06:53,642 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 12 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 12 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:06:53,642 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:06:53,643 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:06:53,643 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 09:06:53,647 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 09:06:53,662 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:06:53,663 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 09:06:53,665 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 710 states. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,220 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,221 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1969 states and 2781 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,221 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,223 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 55 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,223 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,263 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1969 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,263 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1278 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,274 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,295 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1278 states. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,485 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1278 to 1278. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,487 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1278 states. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,498 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1278 states to 1278 states and 1687 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,504 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1278 states and 1687 transitions. Word has length 55 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,505 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,505 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1278 states and 1687 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,505 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,505 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1278 states and 1687 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,516 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 58 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,517 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:06:56,517 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [3, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:06:56,517 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:06:56,518 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:06:56,518 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 548114022, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:06:56,518 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:06:56,518 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:06:56,518 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:06:56,519 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:06:56,519 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:06:56,672 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:06:56,972 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 12 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 12 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,973 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:06:56,974 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,974 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,977 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 09:06:56,978 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:06:56,978 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 09:06:56,979 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1278 states and 1687 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,646 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,647 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 2546 states and 3395 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,647 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,648 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 57 [2019-10-07 09:07:00,648 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,678 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 2546 [2019-10-07 09:07:00,679 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 2524 [2019-10-07 09:07:00,683 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 7 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 3 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=21, Invalid=51, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2019-10-07 09:07:00,688 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 2524 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,904 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 2524 to 2524. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,904 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 2524 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,924 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 2524 states to 2524 states and 3370 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,925 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 2524 states and 3370 transitions. Word has length 57 [2019-10-07 09:07:00,926 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,926 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 2524 states and 3370 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,926 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,926 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 2524 states and 3370 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:00,940 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 283 [2019-10-07 09:07:00,940 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:07:00,941 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:07:00,942 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:07:00,942 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:07:00,942 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1453285466, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:07:00,943 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:07:00,943 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:07:00,943 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:00,943 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:00,943 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:01,085 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:07:01,460 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 226 backedges. 4 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:07:01,460 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:07:01,460 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:07:01,461 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 09:07:01,462 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 09:07:01,462 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:07:01,462 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 09:07:01,462 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 2524 states and 3370 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:04,906 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:07:04,907 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 5050 states and 6769 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:04,907 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:04,908 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 282 [2019-10-07 09:07:04,915 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:07:04,948 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 5050 [2019-10-07 09:07:04,948 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 2544 [2019-10-07 09:07:04,966 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 7 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=24, Invalid=48, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2019-10-07 09:07:04,972 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 2544 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,151 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 2544 to 2540. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,152 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 2540 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,170 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 2540 states to 2540 states and 3396 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,171 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 2540 states and 3396 transitions. Word has length 282 [2019-10-07 09:07:05,176 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,176 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 2540 states and 3396 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,176 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,176 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 2540 states and 3396 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,191 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 282 [2019-10-07 09:07:05,191 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:07:05,191 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:07:05,192 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:07:05,192 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:07:05,193 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 611511583, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:07:05,194 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:07:05,194 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:07:05,194 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:05,194 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:05,195 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:05,319 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:07:05,610 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 226 backedges. 4 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,611 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:07:05,611 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,611 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 09:07:05,613 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 09:07:05,613 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:07:05,614 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 09:07:05,614 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 2540 states and 3396 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,004 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,005 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 5066 states and 6785 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,005 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,006 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 281 [2019-10-07 09:07:09,007 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,028 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 5066 [2019-10-07 09:07:09,028 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 2544 [2019-10-07 09:07:09,041 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 7 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=24, Invalid=48, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2019-10-07 09:07:09,045 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 2544 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,832 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 2544 to 2540. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,832 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 2540 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,845 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 2540 states to 2540 states and 3388 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,846 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 2540 states and 3388 transitions. Word has length 281 [2019-10-07 09:07:09,847 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,848 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 2540 states and 3388 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,848 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,848 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 2540 states and 3388 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:07:09,859 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 280 [2019-10-07 09:07:09,860 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:07:09,860 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:07:09,861 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:07:09,861 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:07:09,861 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1516492276, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:07:09,862 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:07:09,862 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:07:09,862 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:09,862 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:09,862 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:07:09,963 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:07:10,215 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 226 backedges. 4 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:07:10,216 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:07:10,216 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:07:10,216 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [7] imperfect sequences [] total 7 [2019-10-07 09:07:10,217 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2019-10-07 09:07:10,217 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:07:10,218 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=11, Invalid=31, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2019-10-07 09:07:10,218 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 2540 states and 3388 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,700 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,701 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 7612 states and 10166 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,701 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,701 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 279 [2019-10-07 09:08:06,702 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,736 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 7612 [2019-10-07 09:08:06,737 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 5090 [2019-10-07 09:08:06,750 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 17 GetRequests, 4 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 13 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 24 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=60, Invalid=150, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=210 [2019-10-07 09:08:06,757 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 5090 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,964 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 5090 to 5040. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,965 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 5040 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,986 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 5040 states to 5040 states and 6731 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,989 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5040 states and 6731 transitions. Word has length 279 [2019-10-07 09:08:06,990 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,990 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 5040 states and 6731 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,990 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:06,990 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 5040 states and 6731 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:07,010 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 281 [2019-10-07 09:08:07,010 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:08:07,011 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:08:07,011 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:08:07,011 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:08:07,012 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1369699315, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:08:07,012 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:08:07,012 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:08:07,012 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:08:07,012 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:08:07,013 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:08:07,093 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:08:07,419 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 226 backedges. 4 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:08:07,419 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:08:07,421 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:08:07,421 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 09:08:07,424 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 09:08:07,424 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:08:07,425 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 09:08:07,426 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 5040 states and 6731 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:10,872 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:08:10,872 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 7586 states and 10134 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:10,873 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:10,873 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 280 [2019-10-07 09:08:10,874 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:08:10,912 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 7586 [2019-10-07 09:08:10,913 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 4980 [2019-10-07 09:08:10,926 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 7 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=24, Invalid=48, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2019-10-07 09:08:10,935 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 4980 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,191 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 4980 to 4976. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,191 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 4976 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,216 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 4976 states to 4976 states and 6627 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,219 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4976 states and 6627 transitions. Word has length 280 [2019-10-07 09:08:11,219 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,219 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 4976 states and 6627 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,220 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,220 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 4976 states and 6627 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,238 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 277 [2019-10-07 09:08:11,238 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:08:11,239 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:08:11,239 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:08:11,239 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:08:11,239 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1709217756, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:08:11,240 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:08:11,240 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:08:11,240 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:08:11,240 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:08:11,240 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:08:11,329 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:08:11,589 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 225 backedges. 3 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,589 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:08:11,589 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,590 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [7] imperfect sequences [] total 7 [2019-10-07 09:08:11,590 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2019-10-07 09:08:11,591 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:08:11,591 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=11, Invalid=31, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2019-10-07 09:08:11,591 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 4976 states and 6627 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:35,723 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:09:35,723 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 14176 states and 18915 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:35,723 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:35,723 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 276 [2019-10-07 09:09:35,724 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:09:35,794 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 14176 [2019-10-07 09:09:35,794 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 9218 [2019-10-07 09:09:35,820 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 17 GetRequests, 4 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 13 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 24 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=60, Invalid=150, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=210 [2019-10-07 09:09:35,833 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 9218 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,378 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 9218 to 9100. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,379 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 9100 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,415 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 9100 states to 9100 states and 12133 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,421 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 9100 states and 12133 transitions. Word has length 276 [2019-10-07 09:09:36,422 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,422 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 9100 states and 12133 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,422 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,422 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 9100 states and 12133 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,455 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 279 [2019-10-07 09:09:36,455 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:09:36,455 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:09:36,456 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:09:36,456 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:09:36,456 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1313425905, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:09:36,457 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:09:36,458 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:09:36,458 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:36,458 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:36,458 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:36,543 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:09:36,835 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 225 backedges. 3 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,835 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:09:36,835 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,835 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 09:09:36,836 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 09:09:36,836 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:09:36,837 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 09:09:36,837 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 9100 states and 12133 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:41,510 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:09:41,511 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 24362 states and 32613 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:41,511 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:41,511 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 278 [2019-10-07 09:09:41,512 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:09:41,763 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 24362 [2019-10-07 09:09:41,763 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 19262 [2019-10-07 09:09:41,796 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 15 GetRequests, 4 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 18 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=45, Invalid=111, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2019-10-07 09:09:41,825 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 19262 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,656 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 19262 to 19068. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,657 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 19068 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,747 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 19068 states to 19068 states and 25465 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,754 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 19068 states and 25465 transitions. Word has length 278 [2019-10-07 09:09:42,756 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,756 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 19068 states and 25465 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,756 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,757 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 19068 states and 25465 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:42,787 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 280 [2019-10-07 09:09:42,787 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:09:42,788 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:09:42,788 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:09:42,788 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:09:42,788 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1560735441, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:09:42,789 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:09:42,789 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:09:42,789 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:42,789 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:42,789 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:42,871 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:09:43,155 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 225 backedges. 3 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:09:43,156 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:09:43,156 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:09:43,157 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 09:09:43,158 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 09:09:43,158 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:09:43,159 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 09:09:43,159 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 19068 states and 25465 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:48,234 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:09:48,234 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 44346 states and 59365 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:48,235 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:48,235 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 279 [2019-10-07 09:09:48,236 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:09:48,428 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 44346 [2019-10-07 09:09:48,428 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 29278 [2019-10-07 09:09:48,488 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 15 GetRequests, 4 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 18 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=45, Invalid=111, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2019-10-07 09:09:48,532 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 29278 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,027 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 29278 to 29076. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,027 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 29076 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,117 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 29076 states to 29076 states and 38829 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,129 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 29076 states and 38829 transitions. Word has length 279 [2019-10-07 09:09:51,130 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,130 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 29076 states and 38829 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,130 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,130 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 29076 states and 38829 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,161 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 278 [2019-10-07 09:09:51,161 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:09:51,162 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:09:51,162 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 10 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:09:51,162 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:09:51,163 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 2018532508, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:09:51,163 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:09:51,163 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:09:51,163 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:51,163 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:51,164 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:09:51,245 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:09:51,457 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 225 backedges. 3 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 222 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,457 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:09:51,458 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,458 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 09:09:51,459 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 09:09:51,459 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 09:09:51,463 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 09:09:51,463 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 29076 states and 38829 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:56,997 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 09:09:56,998 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 74434 states and 99649 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:09:56,998 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:56,998 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 277 [2019-10-07 09:09:56,999 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 09:09:57,330 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 74434 [2019-10-07 09:09:57,330 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 48740 [2019-10-07 09:09:57,425 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 15 GetRequests, 4 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 17 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=45, Invalid=111, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2019-10-07 09:09:57,491 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 48740 states. [2019-10-07 09:09:59,931 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 48740 to 48478. [2019-10-07 09:09:59,931 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 48478 states. [2019-10-07 09:10:00,086 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 48478 states to 48478 states and 64823 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:10:00,105 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 48478 states and 64823 transitions. Word has length 277 [2019-10-07 09:10:00,106 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 09:10:00,106 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 48478 states and 64823 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:10:00,106 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 09:10:00,106 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 48478 states and 64823 transitions. [2019-10-07 09:10:00,141 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 293 [2019-10-07 09:10:00,142 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 09:10:00,142 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 09:10:00,142 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 11 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 09:10:00,143 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 09:10:00,143 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -917973195, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 09:10:00,143 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 09:10:00,143 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:10:00,143 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:10:00,143 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:10:00,144 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 09:10:00,233 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:10:00,499 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 243 backedges. 6 proven. 5 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 232 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:10:00,499 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 09:10:00,499 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleZ3 [2019-10-07 09:10:00,499 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 2 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 2 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2019-10-07 09:10:01,904 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 09:10:01,924 INFO L256 TraceCheckSpWp]: Trace formula consists of 4055 conjuncts, 9 conjunts are in the unsatisfiable core [2019-10-07 09:10:01,950 INFO L279 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing forward predicates... [2019-10-07 09:10:02,247 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 243 backedges. 15 proven. 5 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 223 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:10:02,248 INFO L322 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing backward predicates... [2019-10-07 09:10:02,686 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 09:10:02,815 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 09:10:03,546 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 243 backedges. 15 proven. 5 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 223 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 09:10:03,547 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSifa [2019-10-07 09:10:03,593 INFO L162 IcfgInterpreter]: Started Sifa with 159 locations of interest [2019-10-07 09:10:03,594 INFO L169 IcfgInterpreter]: Building call graph [2019-10-07 09:10:03,602 INFO L174 IcfgInterpreter]: Initial procedures are [ULTIMATE.start] [2019-10-07 09:10:03,611 INFO L179 IcfgInterpreter]: Starting interpretation [2019-10-07 09:10:03,612 INFO L199 IcfgInterpreter]: Interpreting procedure ULTIMATE.start with input of size 1 for LOIs [2019-10-07 09:10:10,912 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:12,939 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:15,032 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:17,133 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string120.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:19,185 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string124.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:21,221 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string131.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:23,294 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string136.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:25,325 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string141.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:27,364 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string148.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:29,400 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string152.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:31,449 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string153.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:33,482 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string154.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:35,547 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string155.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:37,611 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:39,680 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string175.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:41,738 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string178.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:43,779 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string179.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:45,818 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string180.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:47,981 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string181.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:50,033 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string186.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:52,078 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string187.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:54,115 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string188.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:56,153 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string189.base|) [2019-10-07 09:10:58,205 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string190.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:00,234 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string195.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:02,281 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string197.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:04,354 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string199.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:06,417 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:08,473 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:10,535 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string202.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:12,602 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string207.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:14,657 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string213.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:16,709 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string214.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:18,776 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string215.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:20,816 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string216.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:22,848 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string221.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:24,915 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string227.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:26,972 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string228.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:29,036 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string229.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:31,099 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string230.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:33,172 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string235.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:35,365 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string237.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:37,457 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string240.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:39,627 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string243.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:41,683 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string255.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:43,777 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string256.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:45,910 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string257.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:47,997 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string258.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:50,080 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string263.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:52,178 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string268.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:54,254 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string269.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:56,328 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string270.base|) [2019-10-07 09:11:58,419 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string271.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:00,583 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string276.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:02,779 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string286.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:04,865 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string287.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:07,072 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string288.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:09,126 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string289.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:11,294 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string294.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:13,417 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string302.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:15,475 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string303.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:17,566 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string304.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:19,685 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string305.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:21,801 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string310.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:23,884 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string312.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:25,999 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string313.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:28,123 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string326.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:30,204 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string330.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:32,339 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string331.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:34,452 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string332.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:36,566 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string333.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:38,635 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string338.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:40,915 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |~#mrf24j40_ops~0.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:42,990 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string348.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:45,085 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string354.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:47,159 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string363.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:49,281 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string364.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:51,402 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string365.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:53,481 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string366.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:55,582 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string371.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:57,693 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string398.base|) [2019-10-07 09:12:59,763 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string402.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:01,932 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string403.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:04,051 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |#t~string404.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:06,123 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string405.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:08,197 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string410.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:10,324 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| (select (select |v_#memory_$Pointer$.base_891| |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.base|) |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.offset|)) [2019-10-07 09:13:12,406 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:14,481 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string413.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:16,607 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| |~#set_impl~0.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:18,727 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:20,755 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:22,859 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string120.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:24,900 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string124.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:26,937 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string131.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:28,986 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string136.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:31,035 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string141.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:33,079 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string148.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:35,114 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string152.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:37,151 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string153.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:39,209 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string154.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:41,255 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string155.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:43,299 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:45,360 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string175.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:47,399 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string178.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:49,438 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string179.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:51,484 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string180.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:53,522 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string181.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:55,576 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string186.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:57,632 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string187.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:13:59,717 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string188.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:01,802 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string189.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:03,866 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string190.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:05,910 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string195.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:07,984 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string197.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:10,038 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string199.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:12,089 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:14,146 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:16,256 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string202.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:18,323 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string207.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:20,398 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string213.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:22,478 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string214.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:24,550 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string215.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:26,616 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string216.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:28,673 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string221.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:30,789 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string227.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:32,914 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string228.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:34,982 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string229.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:37,457 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string230.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:39,596 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string235.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:41,700 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string237.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:43,753 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string240.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:45,856 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string243.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:47,931 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string255.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:50,014 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string256.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:52,130 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string257.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:54,215 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string258.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:56,326 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string263.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:14:58,462 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string268.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:00,594 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string269.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:02,688 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string270.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:04,806 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string271.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:06,902 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string276.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:08,990 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string286.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:11,065 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string287.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:13,163 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string288.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:15,300 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string289.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:17,346 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string294.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:19,420 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string302.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:21,603 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string303.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:23,713 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string304.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:25,787 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string305.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:27,916 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string310.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:30,025 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string312.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:32,100 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string313.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:34,271 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string326.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:36,386 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string330.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:38,478 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string331.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:40,543 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string332.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:42,695 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string333.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:44,762 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string338.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:46,838 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#mrf24j40_ops~0.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:48,957 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string348.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:51,061 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string354.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:53,137 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string363.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:55,209 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string364.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:57,321 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string365.base|) [2019-10-07 09:15:59,429 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string366.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:01,751 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string371.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:03,822 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string398.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:05,909 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string402.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:08,049 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string403.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:10,154 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string87.base| |#t~string404.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:12,276 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string405.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:14,398 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string410.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:16,490 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |v_#memory_$Pointer$.base_891| |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.base|) |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.offset|) |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:18,567 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:20,641 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string413.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:22,835 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#set_impl~0.base| |#t~string87.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:25,003 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:27,035 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string120.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:29,107 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string124.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:31,209 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string131.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:33,250 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string136.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:35,288 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string141.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:37,328 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string148.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:39,376 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string152.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:41,408 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string153.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:43,446 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string154.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:45,478 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string155.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:47,547 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:49,588 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string175.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:51,628 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string178.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:53,653 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string179.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:55,704 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string180.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:57,755 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string181.base|) [2019-10-07 09:16:59,783 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string186.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:01,874 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string187.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:03,911 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string188.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:05,949 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string189.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:08,030 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string190.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:10,105 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string195.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:12,142 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string197.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:14,214 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string199.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:16,255 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string200.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:18,292 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string201.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:20,328 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string202.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:22,374 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string207.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:24,460 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string213.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:26,585 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string214.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:28,617 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string215.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:30,710 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string216.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:32,758 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string221.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:34,789 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string227.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:36,867 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string228.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:38,936 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string229.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:41,035 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string230.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:43,102 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string235.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:45,149 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string237.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:47,190 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string240.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:49,231 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string243.base| |#t~string96.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:51,277 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string255.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:53,359 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string256.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:55,412 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string257.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:57,516 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string258.base|) [2019-10-07 09:17:59,576 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string263.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:01,662 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string268.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:03,755 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string269.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:05,867 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string270.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:07,959 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string271.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:09,991 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string276.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:12,065 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string286.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:14,109 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string287.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:16,183 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string288.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:18,287 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string289.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:20,414 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string294.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:22,471 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string302.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:24,589 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string303.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:26,625 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string304.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:28,699 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string305.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:30,803 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string310.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:32,850 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string312.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:34,924 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string313.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:36,994 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string326.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:39,038 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string330.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:41,096 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string331.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:43,187 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string332.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:45,217 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string333.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:47,306 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string338.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:49,406 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |~#mrf24j40_ops~0.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:51,489 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string348.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:53,688 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string354.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:55,804 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string363.base|) [2019-10-07 09:18:57,979 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string364.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:00,082 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string365.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:02,169 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string366.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:04,272 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string371.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:06,340 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string398.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:08,448 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string402.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:10,521 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string403.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:12,648 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string404.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:14,822 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string405.base| |#t~string96.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:16,977 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string410.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:19,029 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| (select (select |v_#memory_$Pointer$.base_891| |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.base|) |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.offset|)) [2019-10-07 09:19:21,122 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |~#mrf24j40_driver~0.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:23,322 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string413.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:25,374 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |~#set_impl~0.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:27,503 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string120.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:29,523 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string124.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:31,636 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string131.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:33,708 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string136.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:35,780 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string141.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:37,815 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string148.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:39,851 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string152.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:41,919 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string153.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:43,956 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string108.base| |#t~string154.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:45,998 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string108.base| |#t~string155.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:48,055 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string108.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:50,104 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string175.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:52,165 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string178.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:54,231 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string179.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:56,272 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string180.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:19:58,300 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string181.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:00,344 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string186.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:02,448 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string187.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:04,496 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string188.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:06,570 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string189.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:08,632 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string190.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:10,675 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string195.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:12,720 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string197.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:14,777 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string199.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 09:20:16,806 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string108.base|)