java -Xmx8000000000 -Xss4m -jar ./plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.3.100.v20150511-1540.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata ./data -tc ../../../trunk/examples/toolchains/AutomizerC.xml -s ../../../trunk/examples/settings/default/automizer/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Automizer_Default.epf --traceabstraction.trace.refinement.strategy SIFA_TAIPAN --sifa.abstract.domain CompoundDomain --rcfgbuilder.size.of.a.code.block LoopFreeBlock --sifa.call.summarizer TopInputCallSummarizer --sifa.fluid SizeLimitFluid --sifa.simplification.technique SIMPLIFY_QUICK -i ../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-validator-v0.8/linux-stable-1dfa93a-1-100_1a-drivers--usb--serial--kobil_sct.ko-entry_point_ldv-val-v0.8.cil.out.i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is Ultimate 0.1.24-36ac518-m [2019-10-07 12:58:22,287 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,291 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,309 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,309 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,310 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,311 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,313 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,315 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,316 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,317 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,318 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,318 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,319 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,320 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,321 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,322 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,323 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,325 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,327 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,328 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,330 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,331 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,332 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,335 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,337 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,338 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,339 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,339 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,342 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,342 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,343 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,344 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,345 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,349 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,349 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,350 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,351 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,351 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,352 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 12:58:22,353 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,354 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/settings/default/automizer/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Automizer_Default.epf [2019-10-07 12:58:22,379 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2019-10-07 12:58:22,380 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2019-10-07 12:58:22,384 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of BlockEncodingV2 differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 12:58:22,384 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Create parallel compositions if possible=false [2019-10-07 12:58:22,384 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use SBE=true [2019-10-07 12:58:22,385 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 12:58:22,385 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2019-10-07 12:58:22,385 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2019-10-07 12:58:22,385 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2019-10-07 12:58:22,385 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2019-10-07 12:58:22,386 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2019-10-07 12:58:22,387 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2019-10-07 12:58:22,387 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2019-10-07 12:58:22,387 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2019-10-07 12:58:22,387 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2019-10-07 12:58:22,388 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2019-10-07 12:58:22,388 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2019-10-07 12:58:22,388 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 12:58:22,388 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Size of a code block=SequenceOfStatements [2019-10-07 12:58:22,388 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * To the following directory=./dump/ [2019-10-07 12:58:22,390 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2019-10-07 12:58:22,390 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2019-10-07 12:58:22,390 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 12:58:22,390 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2019-10-07 12:58:22,391 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2019-10-07 12:58:22,391 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=CAMEL [2019-10-07 12:58:22,391 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2019-10-07 12:58:22,391 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2019-10-07 12:58:22,391 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: Trace refinement strategy -> SIFA_TAIPAN Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Abstract Domain -> CompoundDomain Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder: Size of a code block -> LoopFreeBlock Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Call Summarizer -> TopInputCallSummarizer Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Fluid -> SizeLimitFluid Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Simplification Technique -> SIMPLIFY_QUICK [2019-10-07 12:58:22,666 INFO L81 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2019-10-07 12:58:22,683 INFO L258 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2019-10-07 12:58:22,687 INFO L214 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2019-10-07 12:58:22,688 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2019-10-07 12:58:22,689 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2019-10-07 12:58:22,689 INFO L428 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-validator-v0.8/linux-stable-1dfa93a-1-100_1a-drivers--usb--serial--kobil_sct.ko-entry_point_ldv-val-v0.8.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 12:58:22,765 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/ead1720c4/9da0f59b020441f7a4a8c147782ad6c4/FLAG759ca51b5 [2019-10-07 12:58:23,560 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2019-10-07 12:58:23,563 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /storage/repos/ultimate/trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-validator-v0.8/linux-stable-1dfa93a-1-100_1a-drivers--usb--serial--kobil_sct.ko-entry_point_ldv-val-v0.8.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 12:58:23,600 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/ead1720c4/9da0f59b020441f7a4a8c147782ad6c4/FLAG759ca51b5 [2019-10-07 12:58:23,638 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/ead1720c4/9da0f59b020441f7a4a8c147782ad6c4 [2019-10-07 12:58:23,647 INFO L296 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2019-10-07 12:58:23,649 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 4 elements. [2019-10-07 12:58:23,650 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2019-10-07 12:58:23,650 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2019-10-07 12:58:23,653 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2019-10-07 12:58:23,654 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 07.10 12:58:23" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:23,657 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@69ad50f3 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:23, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 12:58:23,657 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 07.10 12:58:23" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:23,664 INFO L142 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2019-10-07 12:58:23,771 INFO L173 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2019-10-07 12:58:25,042 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2019-10-07 12:58:25,078 INFO L188 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2019-10-07 12:58:25,452 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2019-10-07 12:58:25,661 INFO L192 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2019-10-07 12:58:25,661 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25 WrapperNode [2019-10-07 12:58:25,663 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2019-10-07 12:58:25,664 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2019-10-07 12:58:25,664 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,664 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2019-10-07 12:58:25,687 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,688 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,767 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,768 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,887 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,924 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,957 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,990 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2019-10-07 12:58:25,991 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2019-10-07 12:58:25,991 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2019-10-07 12:58:25,992 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2019-10-07 12:58:25,993 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (1/1) ... No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,100 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.init [2019-10-07 12:58:26,101 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2019-10-07 12:58:26,101 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_tty_insert_flip_string_4 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,101 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __kmalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,102 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kmalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,103 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kzalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,103 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_malloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,103 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_zalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,104 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_init_zalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,104 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_memset [2019-10-07 12:58:26,104 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_undef_int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,105 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_undef_ptr [2019-10-07 12:58:26,106 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_undef_ulong [2019-10-07 12:58:26,106 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_stop [2019-10-07 12:58:26,106 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_endpoint_dir_in [2019-10-07 12:58:26,106 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_endpoint_dir_out [2019-10-07 12:58:26,109 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_endpoint_xfer_int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,110 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_endpoint_is_int_in [2019-10-07 12:58:26,110 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_endpoint_is_int_out [2019-10-07 12:58:26,111 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_register [2019-10-07 12:58:26,111 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_fill_int_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,111 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __create_pipe [2019-10-07 12:58:26,111 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_get_serial_port_data [2019-10-07 12:58:26,112 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_set_serial_port_data [2019-10-07 12:58:26,112 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_debug_data [2019-10-07 12:58:26,112 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_startup [2019-10-07 12:58:26,112 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_release [2019-10-07 12:58:26,113 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_init_termios [2019-10-07 12:58:26,113 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_open [2019-10-07 12:58:26,113 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_close [2019-10-07 12:58:26,113 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_read_int_callback [2019-10-07 12:58:26,114 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_write_callback [2019-10-07 12:58:26,114 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_write [2019-10-07 12:58:26,115 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_write_room [2019-10-07 12:58:26,115 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_tiocmget [2019-10-07 12:58:26,115 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_tiocmset [2019-10-07 12:58:26,115 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_set_termios [2019-10-07 12:58:26,116 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_ioctl [2019-10-07 12:58:26,116 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_init [2019-10-07 12:58:26,116 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kobil_exit [2019-10-07 12:58:26,117 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_initialize_usb_serial_driver_1 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,117 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_usb_driver_2 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,117 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure main [2019-10-07 12:58:26,117 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_tty_insert_flip_string_flags_3 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,118 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_insert_flip_string [2019-10-07 12:58:26,118 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag_5 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,118 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_usb_register_driver_6 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,118 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_tty_port_tty_get_7 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,119 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_tty_flip_buffer_push_8 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,119 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_tty_get_baud_rate_9 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,119 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_tty_encode_baud_rate_10 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,119 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_usb_deregister_11 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,119 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_error [2019-10-07 12:58:26,120 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_initialize [2019-10-07 12:58:26,120 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_handler_precall [2019-10-07 12:58:26,120 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_got_tty [2019-10-07 12:58:26,120 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_check_tty [2019-10-07 12:58:26,121 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_get_drvdata [2019-10-07 12:58:26,121 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_printk [2019-10-07 12:58:26,122 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_set_drvdata [2019-10-07 12:58:26,122 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_check_final_state [2019-10-07 12:58:26,122 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_detach_1 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,123 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_probe_1 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,123 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure msleep [2019-10-07 12:58:26,123 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure printk [2019-10-07 12:58:26,124 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_encode_baud_rate [2019-10-07 12:58:26,124 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_flip_buffer_push [2019-10-07 12:58:26,124 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_get_baud_rate [2019-10-07 12:58:26,124 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag [2019-10-07 12:58:26,125 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_insert_flip_string_flags [2019-10-07 12:58:26,125 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_kref_put [2019-10-07 12:58:26,125 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_port_tty_get [2019-10-07 12:58:26,125 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_alloc_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,126 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_control_msg [2019-10-07 12:58:26,127 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_deregister [2019-10-07 12:58:26,127 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_free_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,128 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_kill_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,128 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_poison_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,128 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_register_driver [2019-10-07 12:58:26,129 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_deregister [2019-10-07 12:58:26,129 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_disconnect [2019-10-07 12:58:26,130 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_probe [2019-10-07 12:58:26,130 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_register [2019-10-07 12:58:26,130 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_submit_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,130 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure external_alloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,131 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kfree [2019-10-07 12:58:26,131 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure #Ultimate.C_memset [2019-10-07 12:58:26,132 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure #Ultimate.meminit [2019-10-07 12:58:26,132 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure #Ultimate.C_memcpy [2019-10-07 12:58:26,132 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_error [2019-10-07 12:58:26,133 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure printk [2019-10-07 12:58:26,133 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure memset [2019-10-07 12:58:26,133 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure msleep [2019-10-07 12:58:26,133 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_kref_put [2019-10-07 12:58:26,133 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_flip_buffer_push [2019-10-07 12:58:26,133 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_tty_flip_buffer_push_8 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,134 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_get_baud_rate [2019-10-07 12:58:26,134 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_tty_get_baud_rate_9 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,134 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_encode_baud_rate [2019-10-07 12:58:26,134 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_tty_encode_baud_rate_10 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,134 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_port_tty_get [2019-10-07 12:58:26,135 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_tty_port_tty_get_7 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,135 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_insert_flip_string_flags [2019-10-07 12:58:26,135 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_tty_insert_flip_string_flags_3 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,135 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag [2019-10-07 12:58:26,135 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag_5 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,136 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_tty_insert_flip_string_4 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,136 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_insert_flip_string [2019-10-07 12:58:26,136 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_got_tty [2019-10-07 12:58:26,136 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_check_tty [2019-10-07 12:58:26,137 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kfree [2019-10-07 12:58:26,137 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_malloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,137 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __kmalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,137 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kmalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,138 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kzalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,138 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure malloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,138 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure calloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,139 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,139 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_ulong [2019-10-07 12:58:26,139 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_pointer [2019-10-07 12:58:26,140 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_assume [2019-10-07 12:58:26,140 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnHeap [2019-10-07 12:58:26,140 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_zalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,141 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.meminit [2019-10-07 12:58:26,143 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_init_zalloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,143 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_memset [2019-10-07 12:58:26,143 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.C_memset [2019-10-07 12:58:26,143 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_undef_int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,144 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_undef_ptr [2019-10-07 12:58:26,144 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_undef_ulong [2019-10-07 12:58:26,144 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_stop [2019-10-07 12:58:26,145 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_initialize_usb_serial_driver_1 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,145 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_usb_driver_2 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,146 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_endpoint_dir_in [2019-10-07 12:58:26,150 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,151 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_endpoint_dir_out [2019-10-07 12:58:26,151 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_endpoint_xfer_int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,151 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_endpoint_is_int_in [2019-10-07 12:58:26,152 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_endpoint_is_int_out [2019-10-07 12:58:26,153 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_get_drvdata [2019-10-07 12:58:26,153 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_set_drvdata [2019-10-07 12:58:26,153 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_printk [2019-10-07 12:58:26,153 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_register_driver [2019-10-07 12:58:26,154 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_usb_register_driver_6 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,163 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_register [2019-10-07 12:58:26,163 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2019-10-07 12:58:26,163 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_deregister [2019-10-07 12:58:26,164 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_usb_deregister_11 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,164 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_fill_int_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,164 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 12:58:26,164 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,165 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_alloc_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,165 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_free_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,165 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_submit_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,166 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_kill_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,167 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_poison_urb [2019-10-07 12:58:26,167 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_control_msg [2019-10-07 12:58:26,167 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __create_pipe [2019-10-07 12:58:26,167 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_get_serial_port_data [2019-10-07 12:58:26,167 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_set_serial_port_data [2019-10-07 12:58:26,168 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_register [2019-10-07 12:58:26,168 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_deregister [2019-10-07 12:58:26,168 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_probe [2019-10-07 12:58:26,168 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_disconnect [2019-10-07 12:58:26,169 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_debug_data [2019-10-07 12:58:26,169 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_startup [2019-10-07 12:58:26,169 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_release [2019-10-07 12:58:26,169 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_open [2019-10-07 12:58:26,169 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_close [2019-10-07 12:58:26,170 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_write [2019-10-07 12:58:26,170 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_write_room [2019-10-07 12:58:26,170 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_ioctl [2019-10-07 12:58:26,170 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_tiocmget [2019-10-07 12:58:26,170 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_tiocmset [2019-10-07 12:58:26,171 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_read_int_callback [2019-10-07 12:58:26,171 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_write_callback [2019-10-07 12:58:26,171 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_set_termios [2019-10-07 12:58:26,171 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_init_termios [2019-10-07 12:58:26,171 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 12:58:26,171 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure memcpy [2019-10-07 12:58:26,171 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.C_memcpy [2019-10-07 12:58:26,172 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_init [2019-10-07 12:58:26,172 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kobil_exit [2019-10-07 12:58:26,172 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_probe_1 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,172 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_detach_1 [2019-10-07 12:58:26,172 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_initialize [2019-10-07 12:58:26,172 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_check_final_state [2019-10-07 12:58:26,173 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure main [2019-10-07 12:58:26,173 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,173 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_error [2019-10-07 12:58:26,173 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_handler_precall [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure external_alloc [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_uint [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure free [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.init [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2019-10-07 12:58:26,174 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~unchecked~int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,175 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~unchecked~int [2019-10-07 12:58:26,175 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~unchecked~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 12:58:26,175 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~unchecked~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 12:58:27,435 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint ldv_stopFINAL: assume true; [2019-10-07 12:58:40,695 INFO L279 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2019-10-07 12:58:40,695 INFO L284 CfgBuilder]: Removed 0 assume(true) statements. [2019-10-07 12:58:40,697 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 07.10 12:58:40 BoogieIcfgContainer [2019-10-07 12:58:40,697 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2019-10-07 12:58:40,698 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2019-10-07 12:58:40,698 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2019-10-07 12:58:40,700 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2019-10-07 12:58:40,700 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 07.10 12:58:23" (1/3) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:40,701 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@6ba6dcd0 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 07.10 12:58:40, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 12:58:40,701 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 12:58:25" (2/3) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:40,702 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@6ba6dcd0 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 07.10 12:58:40, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 12:58:40,702 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 07.10 12:58:40" (3/3) ... [2019-10-07 12:58:40,704 INFO L109 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG linux-stable-1dfa93a-1-100_1a-drivers--usb--serial--kobil_sct.ko-entry_point_ldv-val-v0.8.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 12:58:40,711 INFO L152 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:true NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2019-10-07 12:58:40,721 INFO L164 ceAbstractionStarter]: Appying trace abstraction to program that has 1 error locations. [2019-10-07 12:58:40,733 INFO L249 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 1 error locations. [2019-10-07 12:58:40,767 INFO L373 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interprodecural is true [2019-10-07 12:58:40,767 INFO L374 AbstractCegarLoop]: Hoare is true [2019-10-07 12:58:40,767 INFO L375 AbstractCegarLoop]: Compute interpolants for FPandBP [2019-10-07 12:58:40,767 INFO L376 AbstractCegarLoop]: Backedges is STRAIGHT_LINE [2019-10-07 12:58:40,768 INFO L377 AbstractCegarLoop]: Determinization is PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2019-10-07 12:58:40,768 INFO L378 AbstractCegarLoop]: Difference is false [2019-10-07 12:58:40,768 INFO L379 AbstractCegarLoop]: Minimize is MINIMIZE_SEVPA [2019-10-07 12:58:40,768 INFO L383 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0==of CEGAR loop == AllErrorsAtOnce======== [2019-10-07 12:58:40,802 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 611 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:40,828 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 122 [2019-10-07 12:58:40,830 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:58:40,832 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:58:40,835 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:58:40,842 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:58:40,842 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1248946661, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:58:40,849 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:58:40,849 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:40,850 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:40,850 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:40,850 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:41,466 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:58:41,788 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 88 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 88 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:41,789 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:41,789 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:58:41,790 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 12:58:41,796 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 12:58:41,809 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:58:41,810 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:41,811 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 611 states. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,300 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,301 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1250 states and 1645 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,301 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,303 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 121 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,304 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,337 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1250 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,337 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 644 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,346 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,367 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 644 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,445 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 644 to 644. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,447 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 644 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,452 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 644 states to 644 states and 834 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,454 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 644 states and 834 transitions. Word has length 121 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,455 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,455 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 644 states and 834 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,455 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,455 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 644 states and 834 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,463 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 172 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,463 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:58:42,463 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:58:42,464 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:58:42,464 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:58:42,464 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1512316019, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:58:42,464 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:58:42,465 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:42,465 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:42,465 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:42,465 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:42,594 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:58:42,813 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 162 backedges. 2 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 160 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,814 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:42,815 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,815 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,819 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 12:58:42,820 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:58:42,820 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 12:58:42,820 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 644 states and 834 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:44,987 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:58:44,987 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1851 states and 2400 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:44,988 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 9 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:44,988 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 171 [2019-10-07 12:58:44,992 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,004 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1851 [2019-10-07 12:58:45,004 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1218 [2019-10-07 12:58:45,008 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 10 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 8 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 4 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=28, Invalid=62, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2019-10-07 12:58:45,012 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1218 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,105 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1218 to 1213. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,105 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1213 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,114 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1213 states to 1213 states and 1573 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,117 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1213 states and 1573 transitions. Word has length 171 [2019-10-07 12:58:45,118 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,118 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1213 states and 1573 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,118 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,118 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1213 states and 1573 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,126 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 195 [2019-10-07 12:58:45,126 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:58:45,126 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:58:45,127 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:58:45,127 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:58:45,127 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1238256015, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:58:45,127 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:58:45,127 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:45,128 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:45,128 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:45,128 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:45,277 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:58:45,572 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 198 backedges. 2 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 196 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,572 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:45,572 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,572 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 12:58:45,573 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 12:58:45,573 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:58:45,574 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:45,574 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1213 states and 1573 transitions. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,459 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,459 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 2851 states and 3723 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,460 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,460 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 194 [2019-10-07 12:58:47,461 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,471 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 2851 [2019-10-07 12:58:47,471 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1679 [2019-10-07 12:58:47,476 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:47,479 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1679 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,532 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1679 to 1642. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,533 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1642 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,542 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1642 states to 1642 states and 2095 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,542 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1642 states and 2095 transitions. Word has length 194 [2019-10-07 12:58:47,543 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,544 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1642 states and 2095 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,544 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,544 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1642 states and 2095 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:47,547 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 194 [2019-10-07 12:58:47,547 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:58:47,548 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:58:47,548 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:58:47,548 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:58:47,549 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1749452105, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:58:47,549 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:58:47,549 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:47,549 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:47,549 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:47,549 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:47,767 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:58:48,068 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 198 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 198 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:48,069 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:48,069 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:58:48,069 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 12:58:48,070 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 12:58:48,070 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:58:48,071 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:48,071 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1642 states and 2095 transitions. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,651 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,651 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 3169 states and 4063 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,652 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,652 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 193 [2019-10-07 12:58:49,653 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,672 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 3169 [2019-10-07 12:58:49,672 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 3166 [2019-10-07 12:58:49,675 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:49,682 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 3166 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,879 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 3166 to 3097. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,879 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 3097 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,899 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 3097 states to 3097 states and 3974 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,900 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3097 states and 3974 transitions. Word has length 193 [2019-10-07 12:58:49,902 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,903 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 3097 states and 3974 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,903 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,903 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 3097 states and 3974 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:49,909 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 215 [2019-10-07 12:58:49,910 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:58:49,910 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:58:49,911 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:58:49,911 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:58:49,911 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -504692545, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:58:49,912 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:58:49,912 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:49,912 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:49,914 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:49,914 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:50,054 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:58:50,235 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 206 backedges. 8 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 198 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:50,236 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:50,236 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:58:50,236 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 12:58:50,237 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 12:58:50,237 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:58:50,237 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:50,238 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 3097 states and 3974 transitions. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,553 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,553 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 7014 states and 9079 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,553 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,554 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 214 [2019-10-07 12:58:52,557 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,581 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 7014 [2019-10-07 12:58:52,581 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 3958 [2019-10-07 12:58:52,593 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 12:58:52,598 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 3958 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,753 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 3958 to 3955. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,753 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 3955 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,775 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 3955 states to 3955 states and 5016 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,776 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3955 states and 5016 transitions. Word has length 214 [2019-10-07 12:58:52,777 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,777 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 3955 states and 5016 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,777 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,777 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 3955 states and 5016 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:58:52,785 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 239 [2019-10-07 12:58:52,785 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:58:52,785 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:58:52,786 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:58:52,786 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:58:52,786 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1450024003, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:58:52,786 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:58:52,786 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:52,787 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:52,787 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:52,787 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:58:52,991 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:58:53,341 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 220 backedges. 15 proven. 5 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 200 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:53,342 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:58:53,342 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleZ3 [2019-10-07 12:58:53,342 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 2 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 2 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2019-10-07 12:58:54,429 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:58:54,452 INFO L256 TraceCheckSpWp]: Trace formula consists of 3696 conjuncts, 8 conjunts are in the unsatisfiable core [2019-10-07 12:58:54,474 INFO L279 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing forward predicates... [2019-10-07 12:58:54,546 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 12:58:54,597 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 220 backedges. 17 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 203 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:54,598 INFO L322 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing backward predicates... [2019-10-07 12:58:55,040 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 220 backedges. 15 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 205 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:58:55,041 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 2 perfect and 1 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:58:55,041 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5, 3] imperfect sequences [4] total 7 [2019-10-07 12:58:55,042 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 12:58:55,042 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:58:55,043 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=20, Invalid=22, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2019-10-07 12:58:55,043 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 3955 states and 5016 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,166 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,166 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 9151 states and 11809 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,167 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,167 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 238 [2019-10-07 12:59:01,170 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,209 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 9151 [2019-10-07 12:59:01,210 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 5237 [2019-10-07 12:59:01,226 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 480 GetRequests, 475 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 8 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=20, Invalid=22, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2019-10-07 12:59:01,236 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 5237 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,448 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 5237 to 4845. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,449 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 4845 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,467 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 4845 states to 4845 states and 6170 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,468 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4845 states and 6170 transitions. Word has length 238 [2019-10-07 12:59:01,469 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,469 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 4845 states and 6170 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,469 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,469 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 4845 states and 6170 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:01,479 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 293 [2019-10-07 12:59:01,480 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:59:01,480 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:59:01,697 WARN L499 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: 2 z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2019-10-07 12:59:01,697 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:59:01,698 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:59:01,698 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -216666130, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:59:01,699 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:59:01,699 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:59:01,699 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:01,699 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:01,700 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:02,021 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:59:02,444 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 256 backedges. 19 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 237 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:59:02,444 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:59:02,445 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:59:02,445 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 12:59:02,446 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 12:59:02,447 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:59:02,448 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=18, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 12:59:02,448 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 4845 states and 6170 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:05,921 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:59:05,921 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 10363 states and 13371 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:05,922 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:05,922 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 292 [2019-10-07 12:59:05,923 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:59:05,956 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 10363 [2019-10-07 12:59:05,957 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 5559 [2019-10-07 12:59:05,972 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 7 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=17, Invalid=25, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2019-10-07 12:59:05,980 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 5559 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,188 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 5559 to 5243. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,189 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 5243 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,213 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 5243 states to 5243 states and 6674 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,215 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5243 states and 6674 transitions. Word has length 292 [2019-10-07 12:59:06,216 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,216 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 5243 states and 6674 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,217 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,217 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 5243 states and 6674 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:06,230 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 331 [2019-10-07 12:59:06,231 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:59:06,231 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:59:06,232 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:59:06,232 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:59:06,232 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1251557198, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:59:06,234 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:59:06,234 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:59:06,234 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:06,235 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:06,240 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:07,296 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:59:07,607 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 282 backedges. 0 proven. 20 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 262 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:59:07,607 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:59:07,607 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleZ3 [2019-10-07 12:59:07,608 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 3 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 3 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2019-10-07 12:59:38,472 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:59:38,529 INFO L256 TraceCheckSpWp]: Trace formula consists of 4280 conjuncts, 7 conjunts are in the unsatisfiable core [2019-10-07 12:59:38,545 INFO L279 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing forward predicates... [2019-10-07 12:59:38,578 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 12:59:38,773 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 282 backedges. 98 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 184 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:59:38,773 INFO L322 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing backward predicates... [2019-10-07 12:59:39,194 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 12:59:39,236 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 12:59:39,415 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 282 backedges. 20 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 262 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,415 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 2 perfect and 1 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,416 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6, 6] imperfect sequences [6] total 12 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,419 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 9 states [2019-10-07 12:59:39,420 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 9 interpolants. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,421 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=32, Invalid=100, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,422 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 5243 states and 6674 transitions. Second operand 9 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,733 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,733 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 10469 states and 13333 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,734 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,734 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 9 states. Word has length 330 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,734 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,775 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 10469 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,775 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 5248 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,789 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 668 GetRequests, 652 SyntacticMatches, 3 SemanticMatches, 13 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 22 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.2s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=52, Invalid=158, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=210 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,796 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 5248 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,964 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 5248 to 5248. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,964 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 5248 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,977 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 5248 states to 5248 states and 6679 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,979 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5248 states and 6679 transitions. Word has length 330 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,979 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,980 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 5248 states and 6679 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,980 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 9 states. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,980 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 5248 states and 6679 transitions. [2019-10-07 12:59:39,992 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 336 [2019-10-07 12:59:39,992 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 12:59:39,993 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 12:59:40,207 WARN L499 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: 3 z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2019-10-07 12:59:40,208 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === [ldv_errorErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 12:59:40,209 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 12:59:40,209 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1784878407, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 12:59:40,210 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 12:59:40,210 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:59:40,210 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:40,211 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:40,211 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 12:59:41,123 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 12:59:41,469 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 317 backedges. 0 proven. 33 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 284 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 12:59:41,469 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 12:59:41,470 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleZ3 [2019-10-07 12:59:41,470 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 4 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 4 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2019-10-07 13:00:07,562 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 13:00:07,612 INFO L256 TraceCheckSpWp]: Trace formula consists of 4310 conjuncts, 15 conjunts are in the unsatisfiable core [2019-10-07 13:00:07,625 INFO L279 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing forward predicates... [2019-10-07 13:00:07,867 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 317 backedges. 118 proven. 1 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 198 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 13:00:07,867 INFO L322 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing backward predicates... [2019-10-07 13:00:08,265 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 13:00:08,321 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 13:00:08,321 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 13:00:08,322 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 13:00:12,646 WARN L191 SmtUtils]: Spent 152.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 36 [2019-10-07 13:00:12,648 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 3 terms [2019-10-07 13:00:12,858 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 317 backedges. 0 proven. 33 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 284 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 13:00:12,859 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSifa [2019-10-07 13:00:12,895 INFO L162 IcfgInterpreter]: Started Sifa with 217 locations of interest [2019-10-07 13:00:12,895 INFO L169 IcfgInterpreter]: Building call graph [2019-10-07 13:00:12,903 INFO L174 IcfgInterpreter]: Initial procedures are [ULTIMATE.start] [2019-10-07 13:00:12,910 INFO L179 IcfgInterpreter]: Starting interpretation [2019-10-07 13:00:12,911 INFO L199 IcfgInterpreter]: Interpreting procedure ULTIMATE.start with input of size 1 for LOIs [2019-10-07 13:00:20,709 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:22,739 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:24,822 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:26,939 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string91.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:28,993 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_driver~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_driver~0.offset| 36)) |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:31,038 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_device~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_device~0.offset| 66))) [2019-10-07 13:00:33,075 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:35,122 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |~#kobil_device~0.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:37,172 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string93.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:39,210 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string94.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:41,239 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string101.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:44,895 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string105.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:47,007 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string107.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:49,073 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:51,109 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string118.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:53,143 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:55,181 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string124.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:57,242 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string125.base|) [2019-10-07 13:00:59,287 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string126.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:01,321 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string131.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:03,390 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string132.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:05,470 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string133.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:07,534 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string148.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:09,595 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string149.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:11,675 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string150.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:13,733 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string159.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:15,777 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:17,838 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string161.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:19,948 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string166.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:21,983 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string167.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:24,023 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string168.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:26,098 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string182.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:28,151 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string183.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:30,196 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string184.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:32,240 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string187.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:36,406 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string199.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:38,463 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:40,546 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:42,637 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string204.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:44,713 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string205.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:46,775 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string219.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:48,901 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string220.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:50,997 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string221.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:53,055 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string230.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:55,120 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string231.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:57,195 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string232.base|) [2019-10-07 13:01:59,266 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string242.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:01,340 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string243.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:03,404 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string244.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:05,494 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string247.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:07,547 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string248.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:09,599 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string249.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:11,695 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string261.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:13,773 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string262.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:15,822 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string263.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:17,863 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string266.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:19,943 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string267.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:22,019 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string268.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:24,118 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string280.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:26,253 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string281.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:28,306 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string282.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:30,335 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string288.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:32,467 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string289.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:34,634 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string290.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:36,703 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string295.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:38,780 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string296.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:40,915 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string297.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:43,016 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string301.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:45,103 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string341.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:47,264 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string342.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:49,417 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string343.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:51,478 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string359.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:53,516 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string360.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:55,647 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string361.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:57,835 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string376.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:02:59,957 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string377.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:02,128 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string378.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:04,224 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string390.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:06,316 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string391.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:08,544 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string392.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:10,724 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string395.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:12,849 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string396.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:14,964 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string397.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:17,068 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string407.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:19,163 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string408.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:21,287 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string409.base| |#t~string55.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:23,414 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string412.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:25,533 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string413.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:27,745 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string414.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:29,940 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string424.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:32,039 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string425.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:34,180 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string426.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:36,339 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string489.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:38,516 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string490.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:40,699 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string491.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:42,792 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string55.base| |#t~string497.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:44,883 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:46,933 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:48,973 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string91.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:51,019 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_driver~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_driver~0.offset| 36)) |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:53,055 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_device~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_device~0.offset| 66)) |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:55,108 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:57,143 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#kobil_device~0.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:03:59,196 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string93.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:01,243 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string94.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:03,273 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string101.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:05,418 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string103.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:07,467 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string105.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:09,512 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string107.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:11,544 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:13,593 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string118.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:15,625 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:17,729 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string124.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:19,793 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string125.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:21,903 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string126.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:24,120 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string131.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:26,189 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string132.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:28,412 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string133.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:30,460 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string148.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:32,541 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string149.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:34,652 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string150.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:36,750 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string159.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:38,832 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:40,919 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string161.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:43,045 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string166.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:45,099 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string167.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:47,164 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string168.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:49,243 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string182.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:53,217 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string184.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:55,286 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string187.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:57,361 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string188.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:04:59,482 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string199.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:01,513 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:03,633 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:05,773 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string204.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:07,856 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string205.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:09,932 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string219.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:12,059 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string220.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:14,134 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string221.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:16,160 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string230.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:18,221 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string231.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:20,331 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string232.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:22,405 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string242.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:24,478 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string243.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:26,542 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string244.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:28,634 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string247.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:30,669 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string248.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:34,554 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string261.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:36,605 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string262.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:38,645 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string263.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:40,780 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string266.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:42,854 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string267.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:44,921 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string268.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:47,022 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string280.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:49,214 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string281.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:51,334 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string282.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:53,431 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string288.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:55,559 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string289.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:57,726 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string290.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:05:59,836 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string295.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:01,962 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string296.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:04,055 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string297.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:06,387 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string301.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:08,536 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string341.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:10,631 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string342.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:12,769 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string343.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:14,923 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string359.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:16,974 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string360.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:19,056 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string361.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:21,148 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string376.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:23,238 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string377.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:25,434 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string378.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:27,522 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string390.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:29,701 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string391.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:31,755 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string392.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:33,901 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string395.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:35,975 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string396.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:38,013 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string397.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:40,099 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string407.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:42,231 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string408.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:44,593 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string409.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:46,692 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string412.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:48,889 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string413.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:51,141 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string414.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:53,265 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string424.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:55,358 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string425.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:57,455 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string426.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:06:59,554 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string489.base| |#t~string85.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:01,731 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string490.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:03,857 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string491.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:05,973 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string85.base| |#t~string497.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:08,161 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:10,196 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string91.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:12,282 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_driver~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_driver~0.offset| 36)) |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:14,318 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_device~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_device~0.offset| 66)) |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:16,363 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:18,414 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#kobil_device~0.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:20,457 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string93.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:22,487 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string94.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:24,539 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string101.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:26,586 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string103.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:28,617 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string105.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:30,646 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string107.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:32,761 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:34,817 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string118.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:36,878 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:38,922 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string124.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:40,987 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string125.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:43,061 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string126.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:45,113 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string131.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:49,214 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string133.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:51,247 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string148.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:53,283 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string149.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:55,440 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string150.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:57,489 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string159.base|) [2019-10-07 13:07:59,537 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:01,578 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string161.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:03,698 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string166.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:05,766 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string167.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:07,799 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string168.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:09,870 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string182.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:11,994 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string183.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:14,165 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string184.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:16,208 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string187.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:18,263 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string188.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:20,320 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string199.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:22,379 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:24,450 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:26,957 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string204.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:28,998 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string205.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:31,063 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string219.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:33,133 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string220.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:35,287 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string221.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:37,477 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string230.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:39,596 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string231.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:41,686 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string232.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:43,808 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string242.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:45,869 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string243.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:49,735 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string247.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:51,809 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string248.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:53,881 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string249.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:56,009 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string261.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:08:58,061 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string262.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:00,174 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string263.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:02,314 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string266.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:04,384 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string267.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:06,450 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string268.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:08,527 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string280.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:10,665 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string281.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:12,702 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string282.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:14,776 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string288.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:16,939 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string289.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:19,019 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string290.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:21,112 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string295.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:23,212 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string296.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:25,354 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string297.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:27,438 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string301.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:29,615 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string341.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:31,742 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string342.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:33,801 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string343.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:35,922 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string359.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:38,017 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string360.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:42,617 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string376.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:44,708 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string377.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:46,905 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string378.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:49,098 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string390.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:51,312 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string391.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:53,401 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string392.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:55,496 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string395.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:57,557 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string396.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:09:59,615 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string397.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:01,725 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string407.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:03,846 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string408.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:06,055 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string409.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:08,163 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string412.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:10,261 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string413.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:12,426 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string414.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:14,618 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string424.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:16,778 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string425.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:18,840 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string426.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:20,956 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string489.base| |#t~string86.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:23,112 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string490.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:25,192 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string491.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:27,259 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string86.base| |#t~string497.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:29,349 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string91.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:31,383 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_driver~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_driver~0.offset| 36)) |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:33,406 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#kobil_device~0.base|) (+ |~#kobil_device~0.offset| 66)) |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:35,492 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:37,519 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#kobil_device~0.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:41,414 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string94.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:43,441 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string101.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:45,493 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string103.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:47,527 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string105.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:49,590 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string107.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:51,626 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:53,710 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string118.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:55,757 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:10:57,814 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string124.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:01,626 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string126.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:03,746 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string131.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:05,818 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string132.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:07,870 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string133.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:09,992 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string148.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:12,087 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string149.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:14,159 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string150.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:18,275 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string160.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:20,362 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string161.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:22,423 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string166.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:24,540 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string167.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:26,636 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string168.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:28,683 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string182.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:30,743 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string183.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:32,861 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string184.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:34,934 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string187.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:37,048 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string188.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:39,127 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string199.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:41,188 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:43,263 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:45,389 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string204.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:47,474 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string205.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:49,554 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string219.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:51,611 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string220.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:53,736 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string221.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:55,778 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string230.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:57,835 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string231.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:11:59,895 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string232.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:02,010 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string242.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:04,051 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string243.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:06,092 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string244.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:08,233 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string247.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:10,361 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string248.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:12,511 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string249.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:14,583 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string261.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:16,677 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string262.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:18,781 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string263.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:20,867 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string266.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:22,967 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string267.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:24,996 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string268.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:27,049 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string280.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:29,119 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string281.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:31,193 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string282.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:33,298 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string288.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:35,395 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string88.base| |#t~string289.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:39,767 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string295.base| |#t~string88.base|) [2019-10-07 13:12:41,859 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string296.base| |#t~string88.base|)