java -Xmx8000000000 -Xss4m -jar ./plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.3.100.v20150511-1540.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata ./data -tc ../../../trunk/examples/toolchains/AutomizerC.xml -s ../../../trunk/examples/settings/default/automizer/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Automizer_Default.epf --traceabstraction.trace.refinement.strategy SIFA_TAIPAN --sifa.abstract.domain CompoundDomain --rcfgbuilder.size.of.a.code.block LoopFreeBlock --sifa.call.summarizer TopInputCallSummarizer --sifa.fluid SizeLimitFluid --sifa.simplification.technique SIMPLIFY_QUICK -i ../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.0/usb_urb-drivers-usb-serial-ir-usb.ko.cil.out.i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is Ultimate 0.1.24-36ac518-m [2019-10-07 06:20:43,256 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,259 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,275 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,276 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,277 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,279 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,282 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,284 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,285 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,287 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,288 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,289 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,290 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,291 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,293 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,294 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,295 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,297 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,300 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,302 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,303 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,304 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,306 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,308 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,309 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,309 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,310 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,310 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,312 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,312 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,313 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,314 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,316 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,317 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,317 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,318 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,319 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,319 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,320 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2019-10-07 06:20:43,325 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,327 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/settings/default/automizer/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Automizer_Default.epf [2019-10-07 06:20:43,359 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2019-10-07 06:20:43,360 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2019-10-07 06:20:43,363 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of BlockEncodingV2 differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 06:20:43,363 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Create parallel compositions if possible=false [2019-10-07 06:20:43,363 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use SBE=true [2019-10-07 06:20:43,364 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 06:20:43,364 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2019-10-07 06:20:43,364 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2019-10-07 06:20:43,364 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2019-10-07 06:20:43,364 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2019-10-07 06:20:43,366 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2019-10-07 06:20:43,366 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2019-10-07 06:20:43,366 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2019-10-07 06:20:43,367 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2019-10-07 06:20:43,367 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2019-10-07 06:20:43,367 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2019-10-07 06:20:43,368 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2019-10-07 06:20:43,368 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 06:20:43,368 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Size of a code block=SequenceOfStatements [2019-10-07 06:20:43,368 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * To the following directory=./dump/ [2019-10-07 06:20:43,369 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2019-10-07 06:20:43,369 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2019-10-07 06:20:43,370 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2019-10-07 06:20:43,370 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2019-10-07 06:20:43,370 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2019-10-07 06:20:43,370 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=CAMEL [2019-10-07 06:20:43,370 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2019-10-07 06:20:43,371 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2019-10-07 06:20:43,371 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: Trace refinement strategy -> SIFA_TAIPAN Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Abstract Domain -> CompoundDomain Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder: Size of a code block -> LoopFreeBlock Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Call Summarizer -> TopInputCallSummarizer Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Fluid -> SizeLimitFluid Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.sifa: Simplification Technique -> SIMPLIFY_QUICK [2019-10-07 06:20:43,741 INFO L81 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2019-10-07 06:20:43,761 INFO L258 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2019-10-07 06:20:43,766 INFO L214 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2019-10-07 06:20:43,768 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2019-10-07 06:20:43,769 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2019-10-07 06:20:43,770 INFO L428 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/../../../trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.0/usb_urb-drivers-usb-serial-ir-usb.ko.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 06:20:43,852 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/ddd7973ac/eb8d402f331e47a780b98e97ae144607/FLAG2354b3d16 [2019-10-07 06:20:44,818 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2019-10-07 06:20:44,819 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /storage/repos/ultimate/trunk/examples/svcomp/ldv-linux-3.0/usb_urb-drivers-usb-serial-ir-usb.ko.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 06:20:44,873 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/ddd7973ac/eb8d402f331e47a780b98e97ae144607/FLAG2354b3d16 [2019-10-07 06:20:45,245 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/data/ddd7973ac/eb8d402f331e47a780b98e97ae144607 [2019-10-07 06:20:45,257 INFO L296 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2019-10-07 06:20:45,259 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 4 elements. [2019-10-07 06:20:45,263 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2019-10-07 06:20:45,264 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2019-10-07 06:20:45,268 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2019-10-07 06:20:45,270 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 07.10 06:20:45" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:45,274 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@4df9b0e1 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:45, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 06:20:45,274 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 07.10 06:20:45" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:45,284 INFO L142 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2019-10-07 06:20:45,402 INFO L173 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2019-10-07 06:20:46,805 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2019-10-07 06:20:46,905 INFO L188 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2019-10-07 06:20:47,205 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2019-10-07 06:20:47,313 INFO L192 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2019-10-07 06:20:47,314 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47 WrapperNode [2019-10-07 06:20:47,314 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2019-10-07 06:20:47,315 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2019-10-07 06:20:47,316 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,316 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2019-10-07 06:20:47,334 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,335 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,380 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,380 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,465 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,487 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,500 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,523 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2019-10-07 06:20:47,524 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2019-10-07 06:20:47,525 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2019-10-07 06:20:47,525 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2019-10-07 06:20:47,531 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (1/1) ... No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2019-10-07 06:20:47,624 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.init [2019-10-07 06:20:47,625 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2019-10-07 06:20:47,625 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spinlock_check [2019-10-07 06:20:47,625 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure spin_unlock_irqrestore [2019-10-07 06:20:47,625 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kmalloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,627 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kzalloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,627 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_insert_flip_string [2019-10-07 06:20:47,628 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_register [2019-10-07 06:20:47,628 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_fill_bulk_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,628 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __create_pipe [2019-10-07 06:20:47,629 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __kfifo_uint_must_check_helper [2019-10-07 06:20:47,630 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure irda_usb_dump_class_desc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,630 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure irda_usb_find_class_desc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,630 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_xbof_change [2019-10-07 06:20:47,630 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_startup [2019-10-07 06:20:47,631 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_open [2019-10-07 06:20:47,634 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_prepare_write_buffer [2019-10-07 06:20:47,634 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_process_read_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,634 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_set_termios_callback [2019-10-07 06:20:47,634 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_set_termios [2019-10-07 06:20:47,635 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_init [2019-10-07 06:20:47,635 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ir_exit [2019-10-07 06:20:47,635 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure init_module [2019-10-07 06:20:47,636 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure cleanup_module [2019-10-07 06:20:47,636 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure main [2019-10-07 06:20:47,636 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_blast_assert [2019-10-07 06:20:47,636 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_assume_stop [2019-10-07 06:20:47,637 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_alloc_coherent [2019-10-07 06:20:47,637 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_free_coherent [2019-10-07 06:20:47,637 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_alloc_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,637 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_free_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,637 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_check_final_state [2019-10-07 06:20:47,638 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __kfifo_out [2019-10-07 06:20:47,638 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __kfifo_out_r [2019-10-07 06:20:47,638 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure __kmalloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,638 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure _raw_spin_lock_irqsave [2019-10-07 06:20:47,638 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore [2019-10-07 06:20:47,638 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure dev_err [2019-10-07 06:20:47,639 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_check_return_value [2019-10-07 06:20:47,639 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_initialize [2019-10-07 06:20:47,639 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ldv_undefined_pointer [2019-10-07 06:20:47,639 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure printk [2019-10-07 06:20:47,639 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_encode_baud_rate [2019-10-07 06:20:47,640 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_flip_buffer_push [2019-10-07 06:20:47,640 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_get_baud_rate [2019-10-07 06:20:47,640 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag [2019-10-07 06:20:47,640 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_kref_put [2019-10-07 06:20:47,682 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_port_tty_get [2019-10-07 06:20:47,683 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure tty_termios_copy_hw [2019-10-07 06:20:47,683 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_control_msg [2019-10-07 06:20:47,683 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_deregister [2019-10-07 06:20:47,683 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_register_driver [2019-10-07 06:20:47,683 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_deregister [2019-10-07 06:20:47,683 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_generic_open [2019-10-07 06:20:47,684 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_serial_register [2019-10-07 06:20:47,684 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure usb_submit_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,684 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure external_alloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,684 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure kfree [2019-10-07 06:20:47,684 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_error [2019-10-07 06:20:47,684 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure printk [2019-10-07 06:20:47,685 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure _raw_spin_lock_irqsave [2019-10-07 06:20:47,685 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore [2019-10-07 06:20:47,685 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spinlock_check [2019-10-07 06:20:47,685 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure spin_unlock_irqrestore [2019-10-07 06:20:47,685 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kfree [2019-10-07 06:20:47,685 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __kmalloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,685 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kmalloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,686 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure kzalloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,686 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure init_module [2019-10-07 06:20:47,686 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure cleanup_module [2019-10-07 06:20:47,687 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure dev_err [2019-10-07 06:20:47,687 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_kref_put [2019-10-07 06:20:47,688 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_flip_buffer_push [2019-10-07 06:20:47,688 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_get_baud_rate [2019-10-07 06:20:47,688 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_encode_baud_rate [2019-10-07 06:20:47,688 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_termios_copy_hw [2019-10-07 06:20:47,688 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_port_tty_get [2019-10-07 06:20:47,688 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag [2019-10-07 06:20:47,688 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure tty_insert_flip_string [2019-10-07 06:20:47,689 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_register_driver [2019-10-07 06:20:47,689 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_register [2019-10-07 06:20:47,689 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2019-10-07 06:20:47,690 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_deregister [2019-10-07 06:20:47,691 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_fill_bulk_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,692 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 06:20:47,693 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2019-10-07 06:20:47,693 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_alloc_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,693 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_free_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,693 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_submit_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,693 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_alloc_coherent [2019-10-07 06:20:47,693 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_free_coherent [2019-10-07 06:20:47,694 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_control_msg [2019-10-07 06:20:47,694 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __create_pipe [2019-10-07 06:20:47,694 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~int [2019-10-07 06:20:47,694 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __kfifo_uint_must_check_helper [2019-10-07 06:20:47,697 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __kfifo_out [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __kfifo_out_r [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_register [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_deregister [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_probe [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_disconnect [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure usb_serial_generic_open [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_startup [2019-10-07 06:20:47,698 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_open [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_prepare_write_buffer [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_process_read_urb [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_set_termios [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure irda_usb_dump_class_desc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure irda_usb_find_class_desc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_xbof_change [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure read~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 06:20:47,699 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_set_termios_callback [2019-10-07 06:20:47,700 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_init [2019-10-07 06:20:47,700 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ir_exit [2019-10-07 06:20:47,700 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_check_final_state [2019-10-07 06:20:47,700 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_check_return_value [2019-10-07 06:20:47,700 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_initialize [2019-10-07 06:20:47,701 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_int [2019-10-07 06:20:47,701 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure main [2019-10-07 06:20:47,701 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_blast_assert [2019-10-07 06:20:47,701 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_undefined_pointer [2019-10-07 06:20:47,702 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ldv_assume_stop [2019-10-07 06:20:47,702 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_uint [2019-10-07 06:20:47,702 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure external_alloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,702 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_ulong [2019-10-07 06:20:47,702 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_nondet_pointer [2019-10-07 06:20:47,702 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure free [2019-10-07 06:20:47,702 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2019-10-07 06:20:47,703 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.init [2019-10-07 06:20:47,703 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2019-10-07 06:20:47,703 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~$Pointer$ [2019-10-07 06:20:47,703 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2019-10-07 06:20:48,478 WARN L732 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: Label in the middle of a codeblock. [2019-10-07 06:20:48,680 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##28: assume !false; [2019-10-07 06:20:48,681 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##27: assume false; [2019-10-07 06:20:48,737 WARN L732 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: Label in the middle of a codeblock. [2019-10-07 06:20:48,806 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##25: assume !false; [2019-10-07 06:20:48,807 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##24: assume false; [2019-10-07 06:20:49,400 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint ldv_assume_stopFINAL: assume true; [2019-10-07 06:20:49,411 WARN L732 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: Label in the middle of a codeblock. [2019-10-07 06:20:49,470 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##20: assume !false; [2019-10-07 06:20:49,470 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##19: assume false; [2019-10-07 06:20:52,247 WARN L732 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: Label in the middle of a codeblock. [2019-10-07 06:20:52,378 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##54: assume false; [2019-10-07 06:20:52,379 INFO L685 $ProcedureCfgBuilder]: dead code at ProgramPoint $Ultimate##55: assume !false; [2019-10-07 06:20:57,926 INFO L279 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2019-10-07 06:20:57,926 INFO L284 CfgBuilder]: Removed 27 assume(true) statements. [2019-10-07 06:20:57,928 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 07.10 06:20:57 BoogieIcfgContainer [2019-10-07 06:20:57,928 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2019-10-07 06:20:57,930 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2019-10-07 06:20:57,930 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2019-10-07 06:20:57,934 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2019-10-07 06:20:57,935 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 07.10 06:20:45" (1/3) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:57,936 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@387d49ea and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 07.10 06:20:57, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 06:20:57,936 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 07.10 06:20:47" (2/3) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:57,937 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@387d49ea and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 07.10 06:20:57, skipping insertion in model container [2019-10-07 06:20:57,937 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 07.10 06:20:57" (3/3) ... [2019-10-07 06:20:57,939 INFO L109 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG usb_urb-drivers-usb-serial-ir-usb.ko.cil.out.i [2019-10-07 06:20:57,952 INFO L152 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:true NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2019-10-07 06:20:57,963 INFO L164 ceAbstractionStarter]: Appying trace abstraction to program that has 1 error locations. [2019-10-07 06:20:57,978 INFO L249 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 1 error locations. [2019-10-07 06:20:58,015 INFO L373 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interprodecural is true [2019-10-07 06:20:58,015 INFO L374 AbstractCegarLoop]: Hoare is true [2019-10-07 06:20:58,015 INFO L375 AbstractCegarLoop]: Compute interpolants for FPandBP [2019-10-07 06:20:58,015 INFO L376 AbstractCegarLoop]: Backedges is STRAIGHT_LINE [2019-10-07 06:20:58,015 INFO L377 AbstractCegarLoop]: Determinization is PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2019-10-07 06:20:58,015 INFO L378 AbstractCegarLoop]: Difference is false [2019-10-07 06:20:58,016 INFO L379 AbstractCegarLoop]: Minimize is MINIMIZE_SEVPA [2019-10-07 06:20:58,016 INFO L383 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0==of CEGAR loop == AllErrorsAtOnce======== [2019-10-07 06:20:58,044 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 273 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:58,051 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 25 [2019-10-07 06:20:58,052 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:20:58,053 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:20:58,055 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:20:58,060 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:20:58,061 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1226998262, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:20:58,070 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:20:58,071 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:20:58,071 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:58,071 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:58,072 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:58,582 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:20:58,989 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:20:58,989 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:20:58,990 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:20:58,990 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 06:20:58,999 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 06:20:59,018 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,020 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,024 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 273 states. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,247 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,250 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 678 states and 834 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,251 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,253 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 24 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,254 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,296 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 678 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,296 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 439 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,308 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 4 GetRequests, 3 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,336 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 439 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,487 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 439 to 436. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,490 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 436 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,496 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 436 states to 436 states and 509 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,498 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 436 states and 509 transitions. Word has length 24 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,499 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,499 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 436 states and 509 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,499 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,500 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 436 states and 509 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,501 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 26 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,501 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:20:59,501 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:20:59,502 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:20:59,502 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:20:59,502 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 617583801, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:20:59,502 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:20:59,503 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:20:59,503 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:59,503 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:59,503 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:59,630 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:20:59,790 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,790 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:20:59,791 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,791 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,794 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 06:20:59,794 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,795 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,795 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 436 states and 509 transitions. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,849 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,849 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 438 states and 510 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,850 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,850 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 25 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,850 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,855 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 438 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,856 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 425 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,858 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,861 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 425 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,929 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 425 to 425. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,929 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 425 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,934 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 425 states to 425 states and 493 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,935 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 425 states and 493 transitions. Word has length 25 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,936 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,936 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 425 states and 493 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,936 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,936 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 425 states and 493 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:20:59,951 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 79 [2019-10-07 06:20:59,952 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:20:59,952 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:20:59,952 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:20:59,953 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:20:59,953 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1877764640, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:20:59,953 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:20:59,953 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:20:59,954 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:59,954 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:20:59,954 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:00,157 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:00,474 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 2 backedges. 2 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:00,475 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:00,475 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:21:00,475 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2019-10-07 06:21:00,478 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states [2019-10-07 06:21:00,478 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 8 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:21:00,482 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=17, Invalid=39, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2019-10-07 06:21:00,484 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 425 states and 493 transitions. Second operand 8 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,355 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,355 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1220 states and 1447 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,356 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 12 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,356 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 8 states. Word has length 78 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,357 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,364 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1220 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,364 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 971 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,366 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 18 GetRequests, 7 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 16 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=51, Invalid=105, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,367 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 971 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,448 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 971 to 930. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,448 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 930 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,455 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 930 states to 930 states and 1107 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,455 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 930 states and 1107 transitions. Word has length 78 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,456 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,456 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 930 states and 1107 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,456 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,456 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 930 states and 1107 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,459 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 79 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,459 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:21:09,459 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:21:09,460 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:21:09,460 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:21:09,460 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -439771236, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:21:09,461 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:21:09,461 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:09,461 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:09,461 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:09,461 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:09,568 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:09,754 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 2 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 2 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,755 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:09,755 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,755 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [7] imperfect sequences [] total 7 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,756 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2019-10-07 06:21:09,756 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:21:09,756 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=14, Invalid=28, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2019-10-07 06:21:09,756 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 930 states and 1107 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,501 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,503 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1413 states and 1706 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,503 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,504 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 78 [2019-10-07 06:21:18,505 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,518 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1413 [2019-10-07 06:21:18,518 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1399 [2019-10-07 06:21:18,520 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 13 GetRequests, 7 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 6 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=21, Invalid=35, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2019-10-07 06:21:18,523 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1399 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,646 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1399 to 1351. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,646 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1351 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,659 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1351 states to 1351 states and 1615 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,661 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1351 states and 1615 transitions. Word has length 78 [2019-10-07 06:21:18,662 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,662 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1351 states and 1615 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,663 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,663 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1351 states and 1615 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:18,667 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 82 [2019-10-07 06:21:18,667 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:21:18,668 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:21:18,668 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:21:18,668 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:21:18,669 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1720719521, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:21:18,669 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:21:18,669 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:18,669 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:18,669 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:18,670 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:18,793 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:19,025 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 2 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 2 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,026 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:19,026 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,027 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,028 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states [2019-10-07 06:21:19,028 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 5 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,028 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=7, Invalid=13, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,028 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1351 states and 1615 transitions. Second operand 5 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,380 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,380 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 3730 states and 4483 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,381 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,381 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5 states. Word has length 81 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,382 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,401 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 3730 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,402 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 2662 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,408 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 3 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 6 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=22, Invalid=34, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,413 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 2662 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,582 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 2662 to 2627. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,582 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 2627 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,599 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 2627 states to 2627 states and 3124 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,601 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 2627 states and 3124 transitions. Word has length 81 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,601 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,601 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 2627 states and 3124 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,601 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,602 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 2627 states and 3124 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:19,605 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 86 [2019-10-07 06:21:19,605 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:21:19,605 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:21:19,606 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:21:19,606 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:21:19,606 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 230259465, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:21:19,607 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:21:19,607 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:19,607 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:19,607 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:19,608 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:19,771 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:20,148 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 2 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 2 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:20,149 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:20,149 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:21:20,150 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2019-10-07 06:21:20,150 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states [2019-10-07 06:21:20,151 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 8 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:21:20,151 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=17, Invalid=39, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2019-10-07 06:21:20,151 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 2627 states and 3124 transitions. Second operand 8 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,396 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,396 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 3816 states and 4589 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,397 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,397 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 8 states. Word has length 85 [2019-10-07 06:21:29,401 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,427 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 3816 [2019-10-07 06:21:29,429 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 3813 [2019-10-07 06:21:29,435 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 14 GetRequests, 6 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 8 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 6 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=29, Invalid=61, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2019-10-07 06:21:29,442 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 3813 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,783 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 3813 to 3777. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,783 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 3777 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,810 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 3777 states to 3777 states and 4544 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,810 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3777 states and 4544 transitions. Word has length 85 [2019-10-07 06:21:29,811 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,815 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 3777 states and 4544 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,815 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,815 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 3777 states and 4544 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:29,820 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 103 [2019-10-07 06:21:29,820 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:21:29,820 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:21:29,821 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:21:29,821 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:21:29,821 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 686780997, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:21:29,821 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:21:29,822 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:29,824 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:29,825 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:29,825 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:29,948 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:30,113 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 4 backedges. 2 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 2 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,113 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:30,113 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,114 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,114 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2019-10-07 06:21:30,114 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,116 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,116 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 3777 states and 4544 transitions. Second operand 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,270 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,270 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 5060 states and 6138 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,271 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,271 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 102 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,271 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,293 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 5060 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,293 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 2861 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,303 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,308 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 2861 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,496 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 2861 to 2861. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,496 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 2861 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,518 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 2861 states to 2861 states and 3400 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,520 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 2861 states and 3400 transitions. Word has length 102 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,521 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,521 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 2861 states and 3400 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,521 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,521 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 2861 states and 3400 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:30,526 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 105 [2019-10-07 06:21:30,526 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:21:30,526 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:21:30,527 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:21:30,527 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:21:30,527 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 395563200, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:21:30,527 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:21:30,528 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:30,528 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:30,528 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:30,528 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:30,943 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:31,152 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 4 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 4 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,152 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:31,153 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,153 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,155 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2019-10-07 06:21:31,155 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,155 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,156 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 2861 states and 3400 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,331 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,332 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 5694 states and 6770 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,332 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,332 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 104 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,332 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,352 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 5694 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,352 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 2857 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,364 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 7 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=13, Invalid=29, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,370 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 2857 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,627 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 2857 to 2857. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,627 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 2857 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,639 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 2857 states to 2857 states and 3394 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,641 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 2857 states and 3394 transitions. Word has length 104 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,641 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,641 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 2857 states and 3394 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,641 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,641 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 2857 states and 3394 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:31,646 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 113 [2019-10-07 06:21:31,646 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:21:31,646 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:21:31,647 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:21:31,647 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:21:31,647 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1471324497, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:21:31,647 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:21:31,648 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:31,648 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:31,648 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:31,648 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:31,950 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:32,273 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 4 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 4 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:32,273 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:32,274 INFO L211 tionRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2019-10-07 06:21:32,275 INFO L224 tionRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2019-10-07 06:21:32,275 INFO L442 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states [2019-10-07 06:21:32,275 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 8 interpolants. [2019-10-07 06:21:32,276 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=23, Invalid=33, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2019-10-07 06:21:32,276 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 2857 states and 3394 transitions. Second operand 8 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,365 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,366 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 3997 states and 4924 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,367 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 9 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,367 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 8 states. Word has length 112 [2019-10-07 06:21:36,368 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,389 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 3997 [2019-10-07 06:21:36,390 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 3983 [2019-10-07 06:21:36,392 INFO L606 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 15 GetRequests, 5 SyntacticMatches, 3 SemanticMatches, 7 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 11 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=30, Invalid=42, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2019-10-07 06:21:36,396 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 3983 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,639 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 3983 to 3677. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,639 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 3677 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,654 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 3677 states to 3677 states and 4370 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,655 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3677 states and 4370 transitions. Word has length 112 [2019-10-07 06:21:36,656 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,657 INFO L462 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 3677 states and 4370 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,657 INFO L463 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,657 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 3677 states and 4370 transitions. [2019-10-07 06:21:36,664 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 140 [2019-10-07 06:21:36,664 INFO L377 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2019-10-07 06:21:36,665 INFO L385 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2019-10-07 06:21:36,665 INFO L410 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 10 === [ldv_blast_assertErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2019-10-07 06:21:36,665 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2019-10-07 06:21:36,666 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 503023246, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2019-10-07 06:21:36,666 INFO L150 tionRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2019-10-07 06:21:36,666 INFO L231 tionRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:36,667 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:36,667 INFO L117 rtionOrderModulation]: Craig_TreeInterpolation forces the order to NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:36,667 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2019-10-07 06:21:36,838 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:37,197 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 48 backedges. 0 proven. 25 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 23 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:37,197 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2019-10-07 06:21:37,197 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleZ3 [2019-10-07 06:21:37,198 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY No working directory specified, using /storage/repos/ultimate/releaseScripts/default/UAutomizer-linux/z3 Starting monitored process 2 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 2 with z3 -smt2 -in SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true [2019-10-07 06:21:38,064 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2019-10-07 06:21:38,090 INFO L256 TraceCheckSpWp]: Trace formula consists of 2768 conjuncts, 33 conjunts are in the unsatisfiable core [2019-10-07 06:21:38,108 INFO L279 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing forward predicates... [2019-10-07 06:21:38,143 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,208 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,233 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,243 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,258 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,303 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,304 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,305 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,399 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,457 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,505 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 48 backedges. 20 proven. 13 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 15 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:38,505 INFO L322 TraceCheckSpWp]: Computing backward predicates... [2019-10-07 06:21:38,577 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,578 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,578 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,832 WARN L191 SmtUtils]: Spent 170.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 46 DAG size of output: 30 [2019-10-07 06:21:38,871 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,872 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,873 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 3 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,876 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,877 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,879 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,880 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 3 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:38,902 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,493 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,494 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,503 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,527 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,907 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,908 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,909 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,912 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 3 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:39,936 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,117 WARN L191 SmtUtils]: Spent 104.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 42 DAG size of output: 25 [2019-10-07 06:21:40,154 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 3 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,155 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,156 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,157 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,158 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,159 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,160 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,214 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,215 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,246 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,261 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,267 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,272 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,277 INFO L319 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity, recursing on 2 terms [2019-10-07 06:21:40,355 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 48 backedges. 11 proven. 4 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 33 trivial. 0 not checked. [2019-10-07 06:21:40,356 INFO L286 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSifa [2019-10-07 06:21:40,389 INFO L162 IcfgInterpreter]: Started Sifa with 94 locations of interest [2019-10-07 06:21:40,389 INFO L169 IcfgInterpreter]: Building call graph [2019-10-07 06:21:40,396 INFO L174 IcfgInterpreter]: Initial procedures are [ULTIMATE.start] [2019-10-07 06:21:40,404 INFO L179 IcfgInterpreter]: Starting interpretation [2019-10-07 06:21:40,405 INFO L199 IcfgInterpreter]: Interpreting procedure ULTIMATE.start with input of size 1 for LOIs [2019-10-07 06:21:46,598 WARN L191 SmtUtils]: Spent 1.85 s on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 2400 [2019-10-07 06:21:50,818 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:21:52,843 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:21:54,866 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:21:56,913 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:21:58,937 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 70))) [2019-10-07 06:22:00,973 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string11.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:03,009 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:05,056 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string12.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:08,995 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string16.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:11,177 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string17.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:13,212 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string21.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:15,269 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string22.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:17,335 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string26.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:19,380 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string27.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:23,207 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string32.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:26,696 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string37.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:28,750 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string41.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:30,841 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string42.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:32,905 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string46.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:34,990 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string47.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:37,059 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string51.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:40,403 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string56.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:42,444 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string57.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:45,774 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string62.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:49,053 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string70.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:51,096 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string71.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:53,147 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string73.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:55,166 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string74.base|) [2019-10-07 06:22:58,888 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string77.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:04,003 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string83.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:06,112 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string84.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:08,175 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string89.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:10,225 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:13,408 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string95.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:15,504 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:17,531 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string98.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:19,667 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string99.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:21,693 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string101.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:23,799 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string102.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:25,833 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string104.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:27,877 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string105.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:29,908 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string107.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:31,935 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:33,971 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string110.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:36,000 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string111.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:38,029 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string113.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:41,594 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string116.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:43,610 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:45,628 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:47,780 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string120.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:49,881 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string121.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:53,290 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string133.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:55,367 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string134.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:57,439 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string162.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:23:59,511 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string163.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:01,618 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string164.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:03,711 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string169.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:07,486 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string171.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:09,619 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string174.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:11,753 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string175.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:15,949 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string186.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:18,028 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string187.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:21,364 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| |#t~string191.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:23,425 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:25,474 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:27,553 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string208.base| |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:29,653 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.name.base |#t~string7.base|) [2019-10-07 06:24:31,691 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| ~__param_xbof~0.name.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:33,722 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string7.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.name.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:35,754 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:37,787 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:39,810 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:41,837 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 70)) ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:43,913 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string11.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:45,935 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#ir_device~0.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:47,968 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string12.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:50,012 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string13.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:53,483 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string17.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:55,511 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string21.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:24:57,550 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string22.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:01,508 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string27.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:03,549 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string31.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:05,585 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string32.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:07,627 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string36.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:09,662 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string37.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:11,703 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string41.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:13,763 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string42.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:15,835 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string46.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:17,881 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string47.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:19,938 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string51.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:21,991 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string52.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:24,034 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string56.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:26,072 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string57.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:28,122 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string61.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:30,152 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string62.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:32,214 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string69.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:34,266 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string70.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:36,420 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string71.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:38,475 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string73.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:40,511 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string74.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:42,587 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string76.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:44,626 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string77.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:46,721 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string78.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:25:48,761 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string82.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:50,795 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string83.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:52,846 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string84.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:54,891 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string89.base|) [2019-10-07 06:25:56,944 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:01,004 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string95.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:03,063 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:05,124 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string98.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:07,326 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string99.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:09,378 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string101.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:11,475 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string102.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:13,523 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string104.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:15,562 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string105.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:19,682 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:21,868 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string110.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:23,894 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string111.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:26,154 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string113.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:28,184 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string114.base|) [2019-10-07 06:26:30,363 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string116.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:32,391 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:34,574 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:36,705 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string120.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:38,782 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string121.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:40,880 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string132.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:42,941 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string133.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:45,009 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string134.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:47,069 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string162.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:49,131 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string163.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:52,799 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string169.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:54,941 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string170.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:26:58,827 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string174.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:00,895 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string175.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:03,096 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string176.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:05,176 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string186.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:07,324 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string187.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:09,387 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string190.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:13,458 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:15,618 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string201.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:17,754 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string208.base| ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:19,916 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.name.base ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:23,342 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.name.base ~__param_debug~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:25,371 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:27,406 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:29,447 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 70)) ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:31,500 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string11.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:33,523 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#ir_device~0.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:37,093 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string13.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:39,125 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:42,978 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string21.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:45,027 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string22.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:47,064 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string26.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:49,103 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string27.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:51,157 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string31.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:53,198 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string32.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:55,227 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string36.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:57,265 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string37.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:27:59,306 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string41.base|) [2019-10-07 06:28:03,303 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string46.base|) [2019-10-07 06:28:05,340 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string47.base|) [2019-10-07 06:28:07,381 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string51.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:09,427 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string52.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:11,476 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string56.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:13,519 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string57.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:15,566 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string61.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:17,600 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string62.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:21,558 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string70.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:23,605 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string71.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:27,459 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string74.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:29,578 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string76.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:31,676 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string77.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:33,733 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string78.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:35,768 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string82.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:37,828 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string83.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:39,887 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string84.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:41,922 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string89.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:44,034 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 06:28:46,091 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string93.base|) [2019-10-07 06:28:48,175 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string95.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:50,204 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:52,233 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string98.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:54,278 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string99.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:56,324 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string101.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:28:58,394 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string102.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:00,429 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string104.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:02,453 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string105.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:04,614 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string107.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:06,640 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string108.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:10,431 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string111.base|) [2019-10-07 06:29:14,728 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string114.base|) [2019-10-07 06:29:18,412 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:21,664 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string120.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:25,193 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string132.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:27,300 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string133.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:29,333 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string134.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:31,415 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string162.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:33,492 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string163.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:35,538 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string164.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:37,610 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string169.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:39,645 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string170.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:41,759 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string171.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:43,870 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string174.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:45,968 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string175.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:48,086 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string176.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:50,123 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string186.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:52,176 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string187.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:54,223 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string190.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:56,264 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string191.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:29:58,373 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string200.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:30:02,439 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string208.base| ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:30:04,531 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_debug~0.name.base ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:30:06,576 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base ~__param_xbof~0.name.base) [2019-10-07 06:30:08,596 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_buffer_size~0.name.base ~__param_buffer_size~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:30:10,628 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:30:12,663 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 70))) [2019-10-07 06:30:16,694 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |~#ir_device~0.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:18,728 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string12.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:20,758 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string13.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:24,028 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string17.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:26,091 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string21.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:28,136 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string22.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:30,179 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string26.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:32,219 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string27.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:35,517 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string32.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:37,560 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string36.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:42,922 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string42.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:45,002 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string46.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:47,035 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string47.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:49,099 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string51.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:52,902 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string56.base|) [2019-10-07 06:30:54,949 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string57.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:00,760 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string69.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:02,807 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string70.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:04,841 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string71.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:06,895 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string73.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:08,922 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string74.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:10,988 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string76.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:13,074 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string77.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:15,145 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string78.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:17,189 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string82.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:20,730 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string84.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:22,772 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string89.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:24,828 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:26,878 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string93.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:28,915 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string95.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:31:31,038 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:31:33,060 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string98.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:31:35,215 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string99.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:31:37,252 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string101.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:39,357 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string102.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:41,377 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string104.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:43,400 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string105.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:45,419 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string107.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:47,459 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:49,487 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string110.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:51,527 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string111.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:53,555 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string113.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:55,583 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string114.base|) [2019-10-07 06:31:57,611 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string116.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:31:59,645 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:32:01,674 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:32:05,395 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string121.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:07,469 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string132.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:09,578 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string133.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:11,638 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string134.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:13,764 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string162.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:32:16,080 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string163.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:32:20,128 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string169.base| ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base) [2019-10-07 06:32:22,189 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string170.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:24,236 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string171.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:26,376 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string174.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:28,507 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string175.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:30,628 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string176.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:32,653 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string186.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:34,767 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string187.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:36,945 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string190.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:38,989 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string191.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:41,141 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string200.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:43,226 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string201.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:45,315 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base |#t~string208.base|) [2019-10-07 06:32:48,655 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base ~__param_xbof~0.name.base) [2019-10-07 06:32:50,696 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= ~__param_xbof~0.__annonCompField33.arg.base ~__param_buffer_size~0.name.base) [2019-10-07 06:32:52,730 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (let ((.cse0 (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|))) (= (select .cse0 (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 70)) (select .cse0 (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)))) [2019-10-07 06:32:54,760 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string11.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:32:56,790 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |~#ir_device~0.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:32:58,811 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string12.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:02,264 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string16.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:04,317 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string17.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:06,370 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string21.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:08,402 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string22.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:10,436 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string26.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:12,474 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string27.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:14,510 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string31.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:16,540 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string32.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:18,574 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string36.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:20,626 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string37.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:22,662 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string41.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:24,692 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string42.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:28,086 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string47.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:30,129 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string51.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:33,964 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string56.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:35,999 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string57.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:38,034 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string61.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:40,072 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string62.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:42,116 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string69.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:44,157 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string70.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:47,884 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string73.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:49,908 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string74.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:33:53,713 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string77.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:57,809 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string82.base|) [2019-10-07 06:33:59,857 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string83.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:01,904 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string84.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:03,941 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string89.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:06,057 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string92.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:08,141 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string93.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:10,164 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string95.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:12,308 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string96.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:14,331 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string98.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:16,443 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string99.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:18,471 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string101.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:22,324 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string104.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:24,352 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string105.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:26,382 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string107.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:28,402 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string108.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:30,426 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string110.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:32,441 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string111.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:36,082 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)) |#t~string114.base|) [2019-10-07 06:34:38,122 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string116.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:40,145 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string117.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:42,175 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string119.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:46,429 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string121.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:48,564 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string132.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:50,689 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string133.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:52,755 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string134.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:54,874 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string162.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:57,017 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string163.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:34:59,052 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string164.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:35:01,205 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string169.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:35:03,233 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string170.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:35:05,317 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string171.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:35:07,456 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string174.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4))) [2019-10-07 06:35:09,520 WARN L160 IndexEqualityManager]: solver failed to check if following equality is implied: (= |#t~string175.base| (select (select |#memory_$Pointer$.base| |~#ir_device~0.base|) (+ |~#ir_device~0.offset| 4)))