./Ultimate.py --spec ../../sv-benchmarks/c/properties/unreach-call.prp --file ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe002_pso.opt.i --full-output --architecture 32bit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checking for ERROR reachability Using default analysis Version 7b2dab56 Calling Ultimate with: /usr/bin/java -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/data/config -Xmx15G -Xms4m -jar /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.5.800.v20200727-1323.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/data -tc /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/config/TaipanReach.xml -i ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe002_pso.opt.i -s /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf --cacsl2boogietranslator.entry.function main --witnessprinter.witness.directory /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan --witnessprinter.witness.filename witness.graphml --witnessprinter.write.witness.besides.input.file false --witnessprinter.graph.data.specification CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) --witnessprinter.graph.data.producer Taipan --witnessprinter.graph.data.architecture 32bit --witnessprinter.graph.data.programhash c52682d6b354e0d17c6b6fb1faffd586c5157587 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Execution finished normally Writing output log to file Ultimate.log Writing human readable error path to file UltimateCounterExample.errorpath Result: FALSE --- Real Ultimate output --- This is Ultimate 0.2.0-7b2dab5 [2020-12-09 16:54:53,691 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,693 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,727 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,728 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,729 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,731 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,733 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,735 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,736 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,737 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,738 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,739 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,740 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,741 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,742 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,743 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,744 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,746 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,749 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,751 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,752 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,753 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,754 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,757 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,758 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,758 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,759 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,759 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,760 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,760 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,761 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,762 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,763 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,763 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,764 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,764 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,764 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,764 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,765 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2020-12-09 16:54:53,765 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,766 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf [2020-12-09 16:54:53,789 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2020-12-09 16:54:53,789 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2020-12-09 16:54:53,790 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Boogie Procedure Inliner differ from their defaults: [2020-12-09 16:54:53,790 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * User list type=DISABLED [2020-12-09 16:54:53,790 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Abstract Interpretation differ from their defaults: [2020-12-09 16:54:53,790 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Explicit value domain=true [2020-12-09 16:54:53,790 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain for RCFG-of-the-future=PoormanAbstractDomain [2020-12-09 16:54:53,790 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Octagon Domain=false [2020-12-09 16:54:53,791 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain=CompoundDomain [2020-12-09 16:54:53,791 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check feasibility of abstract posts with an SMT solver=true [2020-12-09 16:54:53,791 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use the RCFG-of-the-future interface=true [2020-12-09 16:54:53,791 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Interval Domain=false [2020-12-09 16:54:53,791 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Sifa differ from their defaults: [2020-12-09 16:54:53,791 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Call Summarizer=TopInputCallSummarizer [2020-12-09 16:54:53,791 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Simplification Technique=SIMPLIFY_QUICK [2020-12-09 16:54:53,792 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2020-12-09 16:54:53,792 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2020-12-09 16:54:53,792 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2020-12-09 16:54:53,792 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Adapt memory model on pointer casts if necessary=true [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2020-12-09 16:54:53,793 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2020-12-09 16:54:53,794 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2020-12-09 16:54:53,794 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2020-12-09 16:54:53,794 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2020-12-09 16:54:53,794 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2020-12-09 16:54:53,794 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2020-12-09 16:54:53,794 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2020-12-09 16:54:53,795 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:54:53,795 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2020-12-09 16:54:53,795 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2020-12-09 16:54:53,795 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement exception blacklist=NONE [2020-12-09 16:54:53,795 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode [2020-12-09 16:54:53,795 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract interpretation Mode=USE_PREDICATES WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 (file:/tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/plugins/com.sun.xml.bind_2.2.0.v201505121915.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int) WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator: Entry function -> main Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness directory -> /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness filename -> witness.graphml Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Write witness besides input file -> false Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data specification -> CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data producer -> Taipan Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data architecture -> 32bit Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data programhash -> c52682d6b354e0d17c6b6fb1faffd586c5157587 [2020-12-09 16:54:53,977 INFO L75 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2020-12-09 16:54:53,993 INFO L261 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2020-12-09 16:54:53,994 INFO L217 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2020-12-09 16:54:53,995 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2020-12-09 16:54:53,996 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2020-12-09 16:54:53,996 INFO L432 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe002_pso.opt.i [2020-12-09 16:54:54,038 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/data/023052ecf/62e17828136443a1bdaee369c9440a60/FLAG9ac9ac7b0 [2020-12-09 16:54:54,450 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2020-12-09 16:54:54,450 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe002_pso.opt.i [2020-12-09 16:54:54,463 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/data/023052ecf/62e17828136443a1bdaee369c9440a60/FLAG9ac9ac7b0 [2020-12-09 16:54:54,849 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/data/023052ecf/62e17828136443a1bdaee369c9440a60 [2020-12-09 16:54:54,854 INFO L299 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2020-12-09 16:54:54,856 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 6 elements. [2020-12-09 16:54:54,858 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:54,858 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2020-12-09 16:54:54,862 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2020-12-09 16:54:54,862 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 09.12 04:54:54" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:54,864 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@1bfc072a and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:54, skipping insertion in model container [2020-12-09 16:54:54,864 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 09.12 04:54:54" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:54,870 INFO L145 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2020-12-09 16:54:54,900 INFO L178 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2020-12-09 16:54:55,003 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe002_pso.opt.i[992,1005] [2020-12-09 16:54:55,125 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2020-12-09 16:54:55,132 INFO L203 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2020-12-09 16:54:55,141 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe002_pso.opt.i[992,1005] [2020-12-09 16:54:55,180 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2020-12-09 16:54:55,232 INFO L208 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2020-12-09 16:54:55,232 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55 WrapperNode [2020-12-09 16:54:55,232 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:55,233 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:55,233 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Procedure Inliner... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,233 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Procedure Inliner initialized [2020-12-09 16:54:55,240 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,257 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer Inliner from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,280 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:55,281 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:55,281 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,281 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2020-12-09 16:54:55,289 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,289 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,294 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,294 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,304 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,307 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,311 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,315 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:55,316 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:55,316 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2020-12-09 16:54:55,316 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2020-12-09 16:54:55,317 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (1/1) ... No working directory specified, using /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/z3 Starting monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2020-12-09 16:54:55,384 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2020-12-09 16:54:55,385 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_begin [2020-12-09 16:54:55,385 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2020-12-09 16:54:55,385 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2020-12-09 16:54:55,385 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P0 [2020-12-09 16:54:55,385 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P0 [2020-12-09 16:54:55,385 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P1 [2020-12-09 16:54:55,385 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P1 [2020-12-09 16:54:55,386 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P2 [2020-12-09 16:54:55,386 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P2 [2020-12-09 16:54:55,386 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2020-12-09 16:54:55,386 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_end [2020-12-09 16:54:55,386 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2020-12-09 16:54:55,386 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2020-12-09 16:54:55,388 WARN L209 CfgBuilder]: User set CodeBlockSize to LoopFreeBlock but program contains fork statements. Overwriting the user preferences and setting CodeBlockSize to SingleStatement [2020-12-09 16:54:56,694 INFO L294 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2020-12-09 16:54:56,694 INFO L299 CfgBuilder]: Removed 10 assume(true) statements. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,695 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 09.12 04:54:56 BoogieIcfgContainer [2020-12-09 16:54:56,696 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:56,697 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:54:56,697 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2020-12-09 16:54:56,699 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2020-12-09 16:54:56,700 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 09.12 04:54:54" (1/3) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:56,700 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@1b7ed2b5 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 09.12 04:54:56, skipping insertion in model container [2020-12-09 16:54:56,700 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 09.12 04:54:55" (2/3) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:56,701 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@1b7ed2b5 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 09.12 04:54:56, skipping insertion in model container [2020-12-09 16:54:56,701 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 09.12 04:54:56" (3/3) ... [2020-12-09 16:54:56,702 INFO L111 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG safe002_pso.opt.i [2020-12-09 16:54:56,712 WARN L169 ceAbstractionStarter]: Switching off computation of Hoare annotation because input is a concurrent program [2020-12-09 16:54:56,712 INFO L180 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:false NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2020-12-09 16:54:56,715 INFO L192 ceAbstractionStarter]: Appying trace abstraction to program that has 2 error locations. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,715 INFO L354 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 1 thread instances. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,743 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,743 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,744 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,745 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,746 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,747 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,748 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,750 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,750 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,750 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,751 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,752 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,753 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,754 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,754 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,754 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,754 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,754 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,754 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,754 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,756 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,756 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,757 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,757 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,757 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,757 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,757 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,757 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,758 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,758 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,758 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,758 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,758 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,758 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,758 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,759 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,759 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,759 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,759 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,759 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,760 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,760 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,760 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,760 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,760 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,760 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,761 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,761 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,761 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,761 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,761 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,762 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,762 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,762 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,762 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,763 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,763 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,763 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,763 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,763 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,764 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,764 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,764 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,764 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,764 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,764 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,765 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,765 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,765 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,765 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,765 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,765 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,765 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,766 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,766 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,766 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,766 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,767 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,767 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,767 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,767 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,768 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,768 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,768 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,770 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,770 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,770 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,771 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,771 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,771 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,771 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,771 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,771 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,772 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,772 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,772 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,772 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,772 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,772 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,773 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,773 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,773 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,773 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,773 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,773 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,774 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,774 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,774 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,774 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,774 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,774 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,776 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,777 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,777 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,777 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,777 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,777 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,778 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,778 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,778 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,778 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,778 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,778 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,780 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,780 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,780 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,781 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,781 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,781 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,781 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,781 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,781 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,781 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,783 INFO L149 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 0 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,794 INFO L253 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 6 error locations. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,813 INFO L377 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interprodecural is true [2020-12-09 16:54:56,814 INFO L378 AbstractCegarLoop]: Hoare is true [2020-12-09 16:54:56,814 INFO L379 AbstractCegarLoop]: Compute interpolants for FPandBP [2020-12-09 16:54:56,814 INFO L380 AbstractCegarLoop]: Backedges is STRAIGHT_LINE [2020-12-09 16:54:56,814 INFO L381 AbstractCegarLoop]: Determinization is PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2020-12-09 16:54:56,814 INFO L382 AbstractCegarLoop]: Difference is false [2020-12-09 16:54:56,814 INFO L383 AbstractCegarLoop]: Minimize is MINIMIZE_SEVPA [2020-12-09 16:54:56,815 INFO L387 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0==of CEGAR loop == AllErrorsAtOnce======== [2020-12-09 16:54:56,826 INFO L120 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Petri net LBE is using semantic-based independence relation. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,828 INFO L135 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Starting large block encoding on Petri net that has 105 places, 97 transitions, 209 flow [2020-12-09 16:54:56,831 INFO L110 LiptonReduction]: Starting Lipton reduction on Petri net that has 105 places, 97 transitions, 209 flow [2020-12-09 16:54:56,833 INFO L74 FinitePrefix]: Start finitePrefix. Operand has 105 places, 97 transitions, 209 flow [2020-12-09 16:54:56,865 INFO L129 PetriNetUnfolder]: 2/94 cut-off events. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,865 INFO L130 PetriNetUnfolder]: For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,868 INFO L84 FinitePrefix]: Finished finitePrefix Result has 104 conditions, 94 events. 2/94 cut-off events. For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. Maximal size of possible extension queue 4. Compared 68 event pairs, 0 based on Foata normal form. 0/90 useless extension candidates. Maximal degree in co-relation 60. Up to 2 conditions per place. [2020-12-09 16:54:56,872 INFO L116 LiptonReduction]: Number of co-enabled transitions 1586 [2020-12-09 16:54:57,114 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,115 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,133 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,133 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,136 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,137 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,139 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,139 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,142 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,143 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,146 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,146 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,148 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,149 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,206 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,206 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,210 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,210 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,927 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,928 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,929 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,929 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,931 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,931 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,932 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,932 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,933 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,934 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,935 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,935 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,936 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,937 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,980 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,981 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:57,983 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:57,983 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,233 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 146.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 83 DAG size of output: 58 [2020-12-09 16:54:58,621 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 334.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 107 DAG size of output: 81 [2020-12-09 16:54:58,782 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,782 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,784 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,784 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,823 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,823 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,824 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,824 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,826 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,826 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,826 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,827 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,828 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,828 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,829 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,829 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,830 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,831 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,939 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,940 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,940 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,940 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,941 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,942 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,943 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,943 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,956 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,957 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,958 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,958 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,959 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,959 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,961 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,961 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,994 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,995 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,995 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,996 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,997 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,997 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:58,999 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:58,999 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,014 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,014 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,015 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,015 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,017 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,017 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,019 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,019 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,080 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,081 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,082 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,082 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,084 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,084 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,085 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,085 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,087 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,087 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,089 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,089 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,090 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,090 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,138 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,139 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,141 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,141 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,218 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,218 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,220 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,221 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,250 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,251 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,260 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,260 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,262 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,262 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,263 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,263 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,264 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,265 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,266 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,267 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,268 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,268 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,365 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,366 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,366 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,367 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,368 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,371 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,371 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,390 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,390 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,391 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,391 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,394 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,394 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,396 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,396 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,800 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,801 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,802 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,803 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,837 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,838 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,849 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,849 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,850 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,850 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,852 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,852 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,853 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,854 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,854 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,855 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,856 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,856 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,897 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,897 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,897 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,897 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,898 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,899 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,900 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,900 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,910 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,910 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,911 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,911 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,912 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,912 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,913 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,913 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,984 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,985 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,985 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,985 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,987 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,987 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:54:59,988 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:54:59,989 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,004 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,004 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,005 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,005 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,006 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,006 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,008 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,008 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,028 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,028 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,028 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,029 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,029 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,030 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,031 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,031 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,046 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,046 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,047 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,047 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,048 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,049 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,050 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,050 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,175 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,175 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,184 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,184 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,185 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,186 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,186 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,187 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,188 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,189 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,189 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,190 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,191 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,191 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,228 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,228 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,230 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,230 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,783 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 240.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 90 DAG size of output: 88 [2020-12-09 16:55:00,902 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 118.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 87 [2020-12-09 16:55:00,908 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,909 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,909 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,909 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,910 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,910 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,911 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,911 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,923 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,923 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,924 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,924 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,925 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,925 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:00,926 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:00,926 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,244 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,244 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,244 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,244 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,245 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,245 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,246 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,247 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,257 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,257 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,257 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,258 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,258 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,259 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,259 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,260 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,275 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,275 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,276 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,276 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,277 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,277 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,278 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,278 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,289 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,289 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,290 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,290 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,291 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,291 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,292 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,292 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,314 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,315 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,315 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,315 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,316 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,316 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,317 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,317 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,328 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,328 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,329 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,329 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,330 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,330 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,331 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,331 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,645 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,645 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,645 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,646 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,646 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,647 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,647 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,647 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,659 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,659 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,660 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,660 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,660 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,661 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:01,662 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2020-12-09 16:55:01,662 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2020-12-09 16:55:02,361 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 267.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 116 DAG size of output: 114 [2020-12-09 16:55:02,491 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 129.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 110 [2020-12-09 16:55:02,751 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 259.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 116 DAG size of output: 114 [2020-12-09 16:55:02,869 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 117.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 110 [2020-12-09 16:55:02,987 INFO L131 LiptonReduction]: Checked pairs total: 3811 [2020-12-09 16:55:02,987 INFO L133 LiptonReduction]: Total number of compositions: 81 [2020-12-09 16:55:02,991 INFO L100 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Start petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Operand has 35 places, 25 transitions, 65 flow [2020-12-09 16:55:03,018 INFO L122 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Finished petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Result 658 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,019 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 658 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,023 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 6 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,023 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:03,023 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,024 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:03,027 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:03,027 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 926950536, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:03,033 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,034 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [372551704] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,034 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:03,122 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:03,185 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,185 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [372551704] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,185 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,185 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [1] imperfect sequences [] total 1 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,186 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [84404059] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,188 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2020-12-09 16:55:03,189 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,198 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,198 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,199 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 658 states. Second operand 3 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,262 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,262 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 550 states and 1693 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,263 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,264 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 5 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,264 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,277 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 550 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,277 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 450 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,278 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 1 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,295 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 450 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,339 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 450 to 450. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,340 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 450 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,346 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 450 states to 450 states and 1358 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,347 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 450 states and 1358 transitions. Word has length 5 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,347 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,347 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 450 states and 1358 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,348 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,348 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 450 states and 1358 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,349 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 10 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,349 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:03,349 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,349 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable0 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,350 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:03,350 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:03,350 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1639622157, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:03,351 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,351 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [991707112] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,351 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:03,377 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:03,424 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,424 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [991707112] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,424 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,425 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [1] imperfect sequences [] total 1 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,425 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1335663245] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,426 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2020-12-09 16:55:03,426 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,427 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,427 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,427 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 450 states and 1358 transitions. Second operand 3 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,451 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,451 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 698 states and 2014 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,452 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,452 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 9 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,452 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,458 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 698 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,458 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 644 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,459 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 1 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,462 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 644 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,485 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 644 to 584. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,485 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 584 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,489 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 584 states to 584 states and 1728 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,489 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 584 states and 1728 transitions. Word has length 9 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,490 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,490 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 584 states and 1728 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,490 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,490 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 584 states and 1728 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,492 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 11 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,492 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:03,492 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,492 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable1 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,492 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:03,493 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:03,493 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 711320530, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:03,493 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,493 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1461749256] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,494 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:03,520 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:03,559 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,560 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1461749256] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,560 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,560 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,560 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [408724192] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,560 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2020-12-09 16:55:03,560 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,561 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,561 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,561 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 584 states and 1728 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,586 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,586 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 614 states and 1772 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,587 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,587 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 10 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,587 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,590 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 614 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,591 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 614 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,591 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 2 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 2 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,593 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 614 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,604 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 614 to 524. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,604 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 524 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,606 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 524 states to 524 states and 1553 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,607 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 524 states and 1553 transitions. Word has length 10 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,607 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,607 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 524 states and 1553 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,607 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,607 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 524 states and 1553 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,608 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,609 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:03,609 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,609 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable2 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,609 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:03,609 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:03,610 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 567281876, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:03,610 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,610 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1095254] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,610 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:03,633 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:03,675 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,675 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1095254] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,676 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,676 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,676 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1152986012] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,676 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2020-12-09 16:55:03,676 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,677 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,677 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,677 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 524 states and 1553 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,703 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,703 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 590 states and 1699 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,704 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,704 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 11 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,704 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,709 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 590 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,709 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 590 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,709 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 2 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 2 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,712 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 590 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,725 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 590 to 482. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,725 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 482 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,728 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 482 states to 482 states and 1420 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,728 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 482 states and 1420 transitions. Word has length 11 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,729 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,729 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 482 states and 1420 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,729 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,729 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 482 states and 1420 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,730 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,730 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:03,730 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,730 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable3 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,731 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:03,731 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:03,731 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 568509817, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:03,731 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,732 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [604153674] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,732 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:03,751 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:03,784 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,785 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [604153674] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,785 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,785 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,785 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [855197775] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,785 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2020-12-09 16:55:03,786 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,786 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,786 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,786 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 482 states and 1420 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,811 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,811 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 575 states and 1656 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,812 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,812 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 11 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,812 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,815 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 575 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,815 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 575 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,815 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 2 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 2 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,817 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 575 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,826 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 575 to 458. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,826 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 458 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,828 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 458 states to 458 states and 1338 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,828 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 458 states and 1338 transitions. Word has length 11 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,828 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,828 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 458 states and 1338 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,828 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,828 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 458 states and 1338 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,829 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 13 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,829 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:03,829 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,829 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable4 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,830 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:03,830 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:03,830 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 405868817, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:03,830 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,830 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [388898584] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,830 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:03,842 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:03,871 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,871 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [388898584] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,871 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,872 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,872 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [218577884] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,872 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states [2020-12-09 16:55:03,872 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,872 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 5 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,872 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,873 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 458 states and 1338 transitions. Second operand 5 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,905 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,905 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 611 states and 1767 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,905 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,906 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5 states. Word has length 12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,906 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,908 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 611 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,908 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 317 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,909 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 4 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 4 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=14, Invalid=16, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,910 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 317 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,917 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 317 to 317. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,918 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 317 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,919 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 317 states to 317 states and 887 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,919 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 317 states and 887 transitions. Word has length 12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,920 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,920 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 317 states and 887 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,920 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,920 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 317 states and 887 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,920 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 14 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,921 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:03,921 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,921 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable5 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,921 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:03,921 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:03,921 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1184464651, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:03,922 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,922 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1864638082] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,922 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:03,938 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:03,968 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,968 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1864638082] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,969 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,969 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,969 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1702988193] [2020-12-09 16:55:03,969 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2020-12-09 16:55:03,969 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:03,970 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,970 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,970 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 317 states and 887 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,990 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,990 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 308 states and 857 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,991 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,991 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 13 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,991 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:03,993 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 308 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,993 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 308 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,994 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 2 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=6, Invalid=6, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:03,995 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 308 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,002 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 308 to 281. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,002 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 281 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,003 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 281 states to 281 states and 776 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,003 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 281 states and 776 transitions. Word has length 13 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,004 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,004 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 281 states and 776 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,004 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,004 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 281 states and 776 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,005 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 15 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,005 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:04,005 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,005 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable6 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,005 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:04,005 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:04,006 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1936261927, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:04,006 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,006 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2028133984] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,006 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:04,026 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:04,067 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,068 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2028133984] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,068 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,068 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,068 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [219215968] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,068 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2020-12-09 16:55:04,069 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,069 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,069 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,069 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 281 states and 776 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,092 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,092 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 281 states and 693 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,093 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,093 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 14 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,093 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,094 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 281 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,094 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 213 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,095 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 4 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 3 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,096 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 213 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,100 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 213 to 213. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,100 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 213 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,101 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 213 states to 213 states and 516 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,101 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 213 states and 516 transitions. Word has length 14 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,101 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,102 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 213 states and 516 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,102 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,102 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 213 states and 516 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,102 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 17 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,102 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:04,103 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,103 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable7 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,103 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:04,103 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:04,103 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1738620764, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:04,103 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,104 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [744231921] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,104 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:04,126 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:04,167 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,167 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [744231921] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,167 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,167 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,168 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1357220622] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,168 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states [2020-12-09 16:55:04,168 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,168 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 5 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,169 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=8, Invalid=12, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,169 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 213 states and 516 transitions. Second operand 5 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,205 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,205 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 183 states and 407 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,206 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,206 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5 states. Word has length 16 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,206 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,207 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 183 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,207 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 145 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,207 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 6 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=18, Invalid=24, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,208 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 145 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,210 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 145 to 145. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,210 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 145 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,211 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 145 states to 145 states and 316 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,211 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 145 states and 316 transitions. Word has length 16 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,211 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,211 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 145 states and 316 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,211 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 145 states and 316 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 19 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable8 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 10 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:04,212 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1068270608, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:04,213 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,213 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1627981254] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,213 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:04,239 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:04,281 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,281 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1627981254] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,282 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,282 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,282 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1445375766] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,282 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2020-12-09 16:55:04,282 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,282 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,283 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=18, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,283 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 145 states and 316 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,324 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,324 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 131 states and 286 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,325 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,325 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 18 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,325 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,325 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 131 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,325 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 121 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,326 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 8 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 7 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 5 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=30, Invalid=42, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,326 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 121 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,327 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 121 to 121. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,328 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 121 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,328 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 121 states to 121 states and 268 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,328 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 121 states and 268 transitions. Word has length 18 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,328 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,328 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 121 states and 268 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,328 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,328 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 121 states and 268 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,329 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,329 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:04,329 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,329 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable9 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,329 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 11 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:04,329 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:04,330 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -167388814, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2020-12-09 16:55:04,330 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,330 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [712964116] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,330 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:04,359 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:04,469 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,469 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [712964116] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,469 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,469 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,470 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1526126785] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,470 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2020-12-09 16:55:04,470 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,470 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,470 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=30, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,470 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 121 states and 268 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,551 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,551 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 170 states and 353 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,551 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,551 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 20 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,552 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,552 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 170 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,552 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 112 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,552 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 6 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 6 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 1 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=17, Invalid=39, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,553 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 112 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,554 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 112 to 101. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,554 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 101 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 101 states to 101 states and 208 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 101 states and 208 transitions. Word has length 20 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 101 states and 208 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 101 states and 208 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:04,555 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,556 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable10 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,556 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 12 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:04,556 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:04,556 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1233592772, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2020-12-09 16:55:04,556 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,556 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1486427000] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,556 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:04,578 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2020-12-09 16:55:04,697 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,697 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1486427000] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,697 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,697 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,697 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1753619024] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,698 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2020-12-09 16:55:04,698 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,698 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,698 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=13, Invalid=29, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,698 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 101 states and 208 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,812 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,812 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 160 states and 322 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,813 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,813 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 20 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,813 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,814 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 160 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,814 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 142 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,814 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 8 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 8 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 7 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=28, Invalid=62, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,815 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 142 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,816 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 142 to 93. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,817 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 93 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,817 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 93 states to 93 states and 188 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,817 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 93 states and 188 transitions. Word has length 20 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,817 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,817 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 93 states and 188 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,817 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,818 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 93 states and 188 transitions. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,818 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,818 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2020-12-09 16:55:04,818 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,818 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable11 [2020-12-09 16:55:04,818 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 13 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2020-12-09 16:55:04,819 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2020-12-09 16:55:04,819 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1810596942, now seen corresponding path program 3 times [2020-12-09 16:55:04,819 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2020-12-09 16:55:04,819 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [768453943] [2020-12-09 16:55:04,819 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2020-12-09 16:55:04,858 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is sat [2020-12-09 16:55:04,858 INFO L221 TraceCheck]: Trace is feasible, we will do another trace check, this time with branch encoders. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,895 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is sat [2020-12-09 16:55:04,896 INFO L221 TraceCheck]: Trace is feasible, we will do another trace check, this time with branch encoders. [2020-12-09 16:55:04,926 INFO L173 FreeRefinementEngine]: Strategy SIFA_TAIPAN found a feasible trace [2020-12-09 16:55:04,927 INFO L523 BasicCegarLoop]: Counterexample might be feasible [2020-12-09 16:55:04,927 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable12 [2020-12-09 16:55:05,000 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction CFG 09.12 04:55:05 BasicIcfg [2020-12-09 16:55:05,000 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:55:05,001 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Witness Printer---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:55:05,001 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Witness Printer... [2020-12-09 16:55:05,001 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Witness Printer initialized [2020-12-09 16:55:05,002 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGCatcher from plugin Witness Printer for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 09.12 04:54:56" (3/4) ... [2020-12-09 16:55:05,004 INFO L131 WitnessPrinter]: Generating witness for reachability counterexample [2020-12-09 16:55:05,083 INFO L141 WitnessManager]: Wrote witness to /tmp/vcloud-vcloud-master/worker/run_dir_83664cc1-f327-4527-b7ca-767039665c31/bin/utaipan/witness.graphml [2020-12-09 16:55:05,084 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Witness Printer---------------------------- [2020-12-09 16:55:05,084 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Toolchain (without parser) took 10228.14 ms. Allocated memory was 90.2 MB in the beginning and 281.0 MB in the end (delta: 190.8 MB). Free memory was 65.5 MB in the beginning and 175.4 MB in the end (delta: -109.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 80.4 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,085 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CDTParser took 0.12 ms. Allocated memory is still 65.0 MB. Free memory is still 40.2 MB. There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,085 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 374.78 ms. Allocated memory is still 90.2 MB. Free memory was 65.2 MB in the beginning and 55.4 MB in the end (delta: 9.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 26.6 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,085 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Procedure Inliner took 47.36 ms. Allocated memory is still 90.2 MB. Free memory was 55.2 MB in the beginning and 52.6 MB in the end (delta: 2.6 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,085 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Preprocessor took 34.56 ms. Allocated memory is still 90.2 MB. Free memory was 52.6 MB in the beginning and 50.5 MB in the end (delta: 2.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,086 INFO L168 Benchmark]: RCFGBuilder took 1379.53 ms. Allocated memory was 90.2 MB in the beginning and 132.1 MB in the end (delta: 41.9 MB). Free memory was 50.5 MB in the beginning and 103.9 MB in the end (delta: -53.3 MB). Peak memory consumption was 35.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,086 INFO L168 Benchmark]: TraceAbstraction took 8303.64 ms. Allocated memory was 132.1 MB in the beginning and 281.0 MB in the end (delta: 148.9 MB). Free memory was 103.9 MB in the beginning and 191.1 MB in the end (delta: -87.3 MB). Peak memory consumption was 61.6 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,086 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Witness Printer took 82.76 ms. Allocated memory is still 281.0 MB. Free memory was 191.1 MB in the beginning and 175.4 MB in the end (delta: 15.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2020-12-09 16:55:05,088 INFO L339 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### End [Toolchain 1] ####################### --- Results --- * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.core: - StatisticsResult: Toolchain Benchmarks Benchmark results are: * CDTParser took 0.12 ms. Allocated memory is still 65.0 MB. Free memory is still 40.2 MB. There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 374.78 ms. Allocated memory is still 90.2 MB. Free memory was 65.2 MB in the beginning and 55.4 MB in the end (delta: 9.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 26.6 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Procedure Inliner took 47.36 ms. Allocated memory is still 90.2 MB. Free memory was 55.2 MB in the beginning and 52.6 MB in the end (delta: 2.6 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Preprocessor took 34.56 ms. Allocated memory is still 90.2 MB. Free memory was 52.6 MB in the beginning and 50.5 MB in the end (delta: 2.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * RCFGBuilder took 1379.53 ms. Allocated memory was 90.2 MB in the beginning and 132.1 MB in the end (delta: 41.9 MB). Free memory was 50.5 MB in the beginning and 103.9 MB in the end (delta: -53.3 MB). Peak memory consumption was 35.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * TraceAbstraction took 8303.64 ms. Allocated memory was 132.1 MB in the beginning and 281.0 MB in the end (delta: 148.9 MB). Free memory was 103.9 MB in the beginning and 191.1 MB in the end (delta: -87.3 MB). Peak memory consumption was 61.6 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Witness Printer took 82.76 ms. Allocated memory is still 281.0 MB. Free memory was 191.1 MB in the beginning and 175.4 MB in the end (delta: 15.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: - StatisticsResult: PetriNetLargeBlockEncoding benchmarks 1122 VarBasedMoverChecksPositive, 75 VarBasedMoverChecksNegative, 19 SemBasedMoverChecksPositive, 56 SemBasedMoverChecksNegative, 0 SemBasedMoverChecksUnknown, SemBasedMoverCheckTime: 1.8s, 113 CheckedPairsTotal, LiptonReductionStatistics: ReductionTime: 6.1s, 105 PlacesBefore, 35 PlacesAfterwards, 97 TransitionsBefore, 25 TransitionsAfterwards, 1586 CoEnabledTransitionPairs, 6 FixpointIterations, 36 TrivialSequentialCompositions, 39 ConcurrentSequentialCompositions, 0 TrivialYvCompositions, 4 ConcurrentYvCompositions, 2 ChoiceCompositions, 81 TotalNumberOfCompositions, 3811 MoverChecksTotal - CounterExampleResult [Line: 19]: a call to reach_error is reachable a call to reach_error is reachable We found a FailurePath: [L710] 0 int __unbuffered_cnt = 0; [L712] 0 int __unbuffered_p0_EAX = 0; [L714] 0 int __unbuffered_p0_EBX = 0; [L716] 0 int __unbuffered_p2_EAX = 0; [L717] 0 _Bool main$tmp_guard0; [L718] 0 _Bool main$tmp_guard1; [L720] 0 int x = 0; [L721] 0 _Bool x$flush_delayed; [L722] 0 int x$mem_tmp; [L723] 0 _Bool x$r_buff0_thd0; [L724] 0 _Bool x$r_buff0_thd1; [L725] 0 _Bool x$r_buff0_thd2; [L726] 0 _Bool x$r_buff0_thd3; [L727] 0 _Bool x$r_buff1_thd0; [L728] 0 _Bool x$r_buff1_thd1; [L729] 0 _Bool x$r_buff1_thd2; [L730] 0 _Bool x$r_buff1_thd3; [L731] 0 _Bool x$read_delayed; [L732] 0 int *x$read_delayed_var; [L733] 0 int x$w_buff0; [L734] 0 _Bool x$w_buff0_used; [L735] 0 int x$w_buff1; [L736] 0 _Bool x$w_buff1_used; [L738] 0 int y = 0; [L739] 0 _Bool weak$$choice0; [L740] 0 _Bool weak$$choice2; [L829] 0 pthread_t t1834; [L830] FCALL, FORK 0 pthread_create(&t1834, ((void *)0), P0, ((void *)0)) VAL [__unbuffered_cnt=0, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=0, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=0, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=0, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=0, x$w_buff0_used=0, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=0] [L831] 0 pthread_t t1835; [L832] FCALL, FORK 0 pthread_create(&t1835, ((void *)0), P1, ((void *)0)) VAL [__unbuffered_cnt=0, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=0, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=0, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=0, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=0, x$w_buff0_used=0, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=0] [L833] 0 pthread_t t1836; [L834] FCALL, FORK 0 pthread_create(&t1836, ((void *)0), P2, ((void *)0)) VAL [__unbuffered_cnt=0, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=0, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=0, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=0, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=0, x$w_buff0_used=0, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=0] [L772] 2 x$w_buff1 = x$w_buff0 [L773] 2 x$w_buff0 = 1 [L774] 2 x$w_buff1_used = x$w_buff0_used [L775] 2 x$w_buff0_used = (_Bool)1 [L19] COND FALSE 2 !(!expression) [L777] 2 x$r_buff1_thd0 = x$r_buff0_thd0 [L778] 2 x$r_buff1_thd1 = x$r_buff0_thd1 [L779] 2 x$r_buff1_thd2 = x$r_buff0_thd2 [L780] 2 x$r_buff1_thd3 = x$r_buff0_thd3 [L781] 2 x$r_buff0_thd2 = (_Bool)1 VAL [__unbuffered_cnt=0, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=0, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=0, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=1, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=0] [L784] 2 y = 1 VAL [__unbuffered_cnt=0, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=0, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=0, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=1, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=1] [L801] 3 __unbuffered_p2_EAX = y VAL [__unbuffered_cnt=0, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=0, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=1, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=1, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=1] [L804] 3 y = 2 VAL [__unbuffered_cnt=0, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=0, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=1, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=1, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=2] [L807] EXPR 3 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L807] EXPR 3 x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? x$w_buff1 : x [L807] EXPR 3 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L807] 3 x = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L808] EXPR 3 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used [L808] 3 x$w_buff0_used = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used [L809] EXPR 3 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff1_used [L809] 3 x$w_buff1_used = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff1_used [L810] EXPR 3 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd3 [L810] 3 x$r_buff0_thd3 = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd3 [L811] EXPR 3 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff1_thd3 [L811] 3 x$r_buff1_thd3 = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd3 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd3 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff1_thd3 [L814] 3 __unbuffered_cnt = __unbuffered_cnt + 1 [L816] 3 return 0; [L744] 1 __unbuffered_p0_EAX = y VAL [\result={0:0}, __unbuffered_cnt=1, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=2, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=1, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=0, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=1, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=2] [L747] 1 weak$$choice0 = __VERIFIER_nondet_bool() [L748] 1 weak$$choice2 = __VERIFIER_nondet_bool() [L749] 1 x$flush_delayed = weak$$choice2 [L750] 1 x$mem_tmp = x [L751] EXPR 1 !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : x$w_buff1) [L751] 1 x = !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : x$w_buff1) [L752] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff0 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : x$w_buff0)) [L752] EXPR 1 !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : x$w_buff0) [L752] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff0 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : x$w_buff0)) [L752] 1 x$w_buff0 = weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff0 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff0 : x$w_buff0)) [L753] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : x$w_buff1)) [L753] EXPR 1 !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : x$w_buff1) [L753] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : x$w_buff1)) [L753] 1 x$w_buff1 = weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? x$w_buff1 : x$w_buff1)) [L754] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff0_used : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used)) [L754] EXPR 1 !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used) [L754] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff0_used : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used)) [L754] 1 x$w_buff0_used = weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff0_used : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff0_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used)) [L755] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff1_used : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0)) [L755] EXPR 1 !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0) [L755] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff1_used : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0)) [L755] 1 x$w_buff1_used = weak$$choice2 ? x$w_buff1_used : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$w_buff1_used : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0)) [L756] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$r_buff0_thd1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff0_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd1)) [L756] EXPR 1 !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff0_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd1) [L756] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$r_buff0_thd1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff0_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd1)) [L756] 1 x$r_buff0_thd1 = weak$$choice2 ? x$r_buff0_thd1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff0_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd1)) [L757] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$r_buff1_thd1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff1_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0)) [L757] EXPR 1 !x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff1_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0) [L757] EXPR 1 weak$$choice2 ? x$r_buff1_thd1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff1_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0)) [L757] 1 x$r_buff1_thd1 = weak$$choice2 ? x$r_buff1_thd1 : (!x$w_buff0_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$w_buff1_used || !x$r_buff0_thd1 && !x$r_buff1_thd1 ? x$r_buff1_thd1 : (x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd1 ? (_Bool)0 : (_Bool)0)) [L758] 1 __unbuffered_p0_EBX = x [L759] EXPR 1 x$flush_delayed ? x$mem_tmp : x [L759] 1 x = x$flush_delayed ? x$mem_tmp : x [L760] 1 x$flush_delayed = (_Bool)0 VAL [\result={0:0}, __unbuffered_cnt=1, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=2, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=1, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=0, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=1, weak$$choice2=0, x=0, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=1, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=2] [L787] EXPR 2 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd2 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L787] 2 x = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd2 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L788] EXPR 2 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used [L788] 2 x$w_buff0_used = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used [L789] EXPR 2 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff1_used [L789] 2 x$w_buff1_used = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff1_used [L790] EXPR 2 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd2 [L790] 2 x$r_buff0_thd2 = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd2 [L791] EXPR 2 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff1_thd2 [L791] 2 x$r_buff1_thd2 = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd2 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd2 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff1_thd2 [L794] 2 __unbuffered_cnt = __unbuffered_cnt + 1 [L796] 2 return 0; [L765] 1 __unbuffered_cnt = __unbuffered_cnt + 1 [L767] 1 return 0; [L836] 0 main$tmp_guard0 = __unbuffered_cnt == 3 VAL [\result={0:0}, \result={0:0}, __unbuffered_cnt=3, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=2, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=1, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=1, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=1, weak$$choice2=0, x=1, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=0, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=2] [L4] COND FALSE 0 !(!cond) [L840] EXPR 0 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L840] EXPR 0 x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? x$w_buff1 : x [L840] EXPR 0 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L840] 0 x = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 ? x$w_buff0 : (x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? x$w_buff1 : x) [L841] EXPR 0 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used [L841] 0 x$w_buff0_used = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff0_used [L842] EXPR 0 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff1_used [L842] 0 x$w_buff1_used = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$w_buff1_used [L843] EXPR 0 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd0 [L843] 0 x$r_buff0_thd0 = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff0_thd0 [L844] EXPR 0 x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff1_thd0 [L844] 0 x$r_buff1_thd0 = x$w_buff0_used && x$r_buff0_thd0 || x$w_buff1_used && x$r_buff1_thd0 ? (_Bool)0 : x$r_buff1_thd0 [L847] 0 main$tmp_guard1 = !(y == 2 && __unbuffered_p0_EAX == 2 && __unbuffered_p0_EBX == 0 && __unbuffered_p2_EAX == 1) [L19] COND TRUE 0 !expression [L19] 0 reach_error() VAL [\result={0:0}, \result={0:0}, __unbuffered_cnt=3, __unbuffered_p0_EAX=2, __unbuffered_p0_EBX=0, __unbuffered_p2_EAX=1, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, arg={0:0}, main$tmp_guard0=1, main$tmp_guard1=0, weak$$choice0=1, weak$$choice2=0, x=1, x$flush_delayed=0, x$mem_tmp=0, x$r_buff0_thd0=0, x$r_buff0_thd1=0, x$r_buff0_thd2=1, x$r_buff0_thd3=0, x$r_buff1_thd0=0, x$r_buff1_thd1=0, x$r_buff1_thd2=0, x$r_buff1_thd3=0, x$read_delayed=0, x$read_delayed_var={0:0}, x$w_buff0=1, x$w_buff0_used=0, x$w_buff1=0, x$w_buff1_used=0, y=2] - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data CFG has 4 procedures, 96 locations, 2 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. VerificationResult: UNSAFE, OverallTime: 8.1s, OverallIterations: 13, TraceHistogramMax: 1, AutomataDifference: 0.5s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 6.2s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: 258 SDtfs, 361 SDslu, 457 SDs, 0 SdLazy, 201 SolverSat, 73 SolverUnsat, 0 SolverUnknown, 0 SolverNotchecked, 0.2s Time, PredicateUnifierStatistics: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 47 GetRequests, 4 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 43 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 15 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.3s Time, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=658occurred in iteration=0, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: 0.1s AutomataMinimizationTime, 12 MinimizatonAttempts, 462 StatesRemovedByMinimization, 7 NontrivialMinimizations, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.0s SsaConstructionTime, 0.2s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 0.6s InterpolantComputationTime, 179 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 179 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 13 NumberOfCheckSat, 147 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 15740 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 12 InterpolantComputations, 12 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available RESULT: Ultimate proved your program to be incorrect! Received shutdown request...