./Ultimate.py --spec ../../sv-benchmarks/c/properties/unreach-call.prp --file ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.oepc.i --full-output --architecture 32bit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checking for ERROR reachability Using default analysis Version 7b2dab56 Calling Ultimate with: /usr/bin/java -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/config -Xmx15G -Xms4m -jar /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.5.800.v20200727-1323.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data -tc /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/TaipanReach.xml -i ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.oepc.i -s /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf --cacsl2boogietranslator.entry.function main --witnessprinter.witness.directory /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI --witnessprinter.witness.filename witness.graphml --witnessprinter.write.witness.besides.input.file false --witnessprinter.graph.data.specification CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) --witnessprinter.graph.data.producer Taipan --witnessprinter.graph.data.architecture 32bit --witnessprinter.graph.data.programhash 427366b4838c871bc0592359f32fd964a6719c54 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Execution finished normally Writing output log to file Ultimate.log Result: TRUE --- Real Ultimate output --- This is Ultimate 0.2.0-7b2dab5 [2021-10-11 02:27:01,495 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,498 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,551 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,552 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,557 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,559 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,563 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,566 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,575 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,576 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,578 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,578 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,582 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,584 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,586 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,588 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,593 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,596 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,607 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,609 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,613 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,617 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,618 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,627 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,628 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,628 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,630 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,631 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,634 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,634 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,635 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,638 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,639 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,640 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,640 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,641 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,641 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,642 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,643 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:27:01,643 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2021-10-11 02:27:01,646 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf [2021-10-11 02:27:01,696 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2021-10-11 02:27:01,696 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2021-10-11 02:27:01,698 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Boogie Procedure Inliner differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:27:01,698 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * User list type=DISABLED [2021-10-11 02:27:01,698 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Abstract Interpretation differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:27:01,699 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Explicit value domain=true [2021-10-11 02:27:01,699 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain for RCFG-of-the-future=PoormanAbstractDomain [2021-10-11 02:27:01,699 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Octagon Domain=false [2021-10-11 02:27:01,706 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain=CompoundDomain [2021-10-11 02:27:01,706 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check feasibility of abstract posts with an SMT solver=true [2021-10-11 02:27:01,707 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use the RCFG-of-the-future interface=true [2021-10-11 02:27:01,708 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Interval Domain=false [2021-10-11 02:27:01,708 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Sifa differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:27:01,708 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Call Summarizer=TopInputCallSummarizer [2021-10-11 02:27:01,708 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Simplification Technique=SIMPLIFY_QUICK [2021-10-11 02:27:01,710 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:27:01,711 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2021-10-11 02:27:01,711 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2021-10-11 02:27:01,711 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2021-10-11 02:27:01,711 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:27:01,711 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:27:01,712 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:27:01,712 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:27:01,712 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Adapt memory model on pointer casts if necessary=true [2021-10-11 02:27:01,712 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2021-10-11 02:27:01,712 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2021-10-11 02:27:01,713 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2021-10-11 02:27:01,713 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:27:01,713 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:27:01,715 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2021-10-11 02:27:01,715 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2021-10-11 02:27:01,715 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:27:01,716 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2021-10-11 02:27:01,716 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2021-10-11 02:27:01,716 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:01,716 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2021-10-11 02:27:01,716 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2021-10-11 02:27:01,716 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement exception blacklist=NONE [2021-10-11 02:27:01,717 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode [2021-10-11 02:27:01,717 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract interpretation Mode=USE_PREDICATES WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 (file:/tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/plugins/com.sun.xml.bind_2.2.0.v201505121915.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int) WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator: Entry function -> main Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness directory -> /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness filename -> witness.graphml Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Write witness besides input file -> false Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data specification -> CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data producer -> Taipan Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data architecture -> 32bit Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data programhash -> 427366b4838c871bc0592359f32fd964a6719c54 [2021-10-11 02:27:02,016 INFO L75 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2021-10-11 02:27:02,040 INFO L261 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:02,043 INFO L217 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2021-10-11 02:27:02,044 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2021-10-11 02:27:02,045 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:02,047 INFO L432 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.oepc.i [2021-10-11 02:27:02,130 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/9a8398ac0/38d2c554bd3c40679c927e95b86d1b39/FLAG799164a17 [2021-10-11 02:27:02,857 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2021-10-11 02:27:02,857 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.oepc.i [2021-10-11 02:27:02,878 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/9a8398ac0/38d2c554bd3c40679c927e95b86d1b39/FLAG799164a17 [2021-10-11 02:27:03,031 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/9a8398ac0/38d2c554bd3c40679c927e95b86d1b39 [2021-10-11 02:27:03,033 INFO L299 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2021-10-11 02:27:03,034 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 6 elements. [2021-10-11 02:27:03,038 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:03,038 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2021-10-11 02:27:03,042 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:03,045 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:03,048 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@5d433755 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:27:03,049 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:03,057 INFO L145 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2021-10-11 02:27:03,139 INFO L178 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2021-10-11 02:27:03,367 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.oepc.i[952,965] [2021-10-11 02:27:03,784 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2021-10-11 02:27:03,794 INFO L203 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2021-10-11 02:27:03,815 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.oepc.i[952,965] [2021-10-11 02:27:03,902 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2021-10-11 02:27:03,987 INFO L208 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2021-10-11 02:27:03,988 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03 WrapperNode [2021-10-11 02:27:03,988 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:03,990 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:03,990 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Procedure Inliner... [2021-10-11 02:27:03,990 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Procedure Inliner initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:03,999 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,025 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer Inliner from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,082 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:04,083 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:04,084 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,084 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:04,094 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,094 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,100 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,100 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,118 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,139 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,143 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,167 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:04,168 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:04,168 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2021-10-11 02:27:04,169 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:04,176 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/1) ... No working directory specified, using /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/z3 Starting monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2021-10-11 02:27:04,274 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2021-10-11 02:27:04,274 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_begin [2021-10-11 02:27:04,275 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2021-10-11 02:27:04,275 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2021-10-11 02:27:04,275 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:27:04,275 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:27:04,277 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:27:04,277 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:27:04,277 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P2 [2021-10-11 02:27:04,278 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P2 [2021-10-11 02:27:04,278 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2021-10-11 02:27:04,278 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_end [2021-10-11 02:27:04,278 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2021-10-11 02:27:04,278 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2021-10-11 02:27:04,280 WARN L209 CfgBuilder]: User set CodeBlockSize to LoopFreeBlock but program contains fork statements. Overwriting the user preferences and setting CodeBlockSize to SingleStatement [2021-10-11 02:27:10,087 INFO L294 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2021-10-11 02:27:10,088 INFO L299 CfgBuilder]: Removed 10 assume(true) statements. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,092 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:27:10 BoogieIcfgContainer [2021-10-11 02:27:10,093 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:10,097 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:10,097 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2021-10-11 02:27:10,103 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:10,104 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:27:03" (1/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:10,105 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@2697c004 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 11.10 02:27:10, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:27:10,105 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:27:03" (2/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:10,105 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@2697c004 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 11.10 02:27:10, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:27:10,105 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:27:10" (3/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:10,107 INFO L111 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG safe035_power.oepc.i [2021-10-11 02:27:10,128 WARN L169 ceAbstractionStarter]: Switching off computation of Hoare annotation because input is a concurrent program [2021-10-11 02:27:10,128 INFO L180 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:false NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2021-10-11 02:27:10,133 INFO L192 ceAbstractionStarter]: Appying trace abstraction to program that has 2 error locations. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,134 INFO L354 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 1 thread instances. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,215 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,215 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,215 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,215 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,216 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,216 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,216 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,216 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,216 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,217 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,217 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,217 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,217 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,217 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,218 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,219 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,219 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,219 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,219 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,219 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,220 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,220 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,221 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,222 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,222 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,222 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,223 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,223 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,223 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,224 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,224 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,224 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,224 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,224 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,224 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,225 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,225 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,225 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,226 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,226 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,226 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,227 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,227 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,227 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,227 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,227 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,228 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,228 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,228 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,229 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,229 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,229 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,229 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,229 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,229 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,230 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,230 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,230 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,230 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,230 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,231 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,231 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,231 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,231 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,232 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,232 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,232 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,232 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,232 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,232 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,232 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,233 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,233 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,233 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,233 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,234 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,234 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,234 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,234 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,235 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,236 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,239 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,239 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,239 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,239 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,239 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,239 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,240 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,240 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,242 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,242 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,242 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,242 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,248 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,249 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,249 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,249 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,249 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,249 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,250 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,252 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,252 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,258 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,258 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,260 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,260 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,260 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,261 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,261 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,261 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,261 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,261 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,262 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,262 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,262 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,262 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,263 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,263 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,265 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,266 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,266 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,268 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,268 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,268 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,268 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,268 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,269 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,269 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,269 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,269 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,269 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,269 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,269 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,270 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,270 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,270 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,270 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,272 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,272 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,272 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,272 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,272 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,272 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,272 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite79| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite76| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite70| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,275 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,279 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite73| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,281 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,281 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,281 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite80| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,285 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,285 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,285 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,286 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,286 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,286 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,286 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,286 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,286 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,287 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,287 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite79| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite76| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite70| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite73| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite80| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,299 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,301 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,301 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite82| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,301 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,301 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite86| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,301 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite85| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,301 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite84| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite83| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite82| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite86| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite85| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite84| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite83| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,304 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite86| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite85| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite84| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite83| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite82| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite80| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite73| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite70| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite79| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,311 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,312 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite76| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,315 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,315 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,315 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,315 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,316 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,316 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,316 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,316 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,316 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,316 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,316 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,317 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,317 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,317 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,317 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,317 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,321 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,323 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,324 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,324 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,324 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,324 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,324 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,324 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,326 INFO L149 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 0 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,339 INFO L253 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 6 error locations. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,373 INFO L377 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interprodecural is true [2021-10-11 02:27:10,373 INFO L378 AbstractCegarLoop]: Hoare is true [2021-10-11 02:27:10,373 INFO L379 AbstractCegarLoop]: Compute interpolants for FPandBP [2021-10-11 02:27:10,373 INFO L380 AbstractCegarLoop]: Backedges is STRAIGHT_LINE [2021-10-11 02:27:10,373 INFO L381 AbstractCegarLoop]: Determinization is PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2021-10-11 02:27:10,373 INFO L382 AbstractCegarLoop]: Difference is false [2021-10-11 02:27:10,373 INFO L383 AbstractCegarLoop]: Minimize is MINIMIZE_SEVPA [2021-10-11 02:27:10,374 INFO L387 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0==of CEGAR loop == AllErrorsAtOnce======== [2021-10-11 02:27:10,389 INFO L120 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Petri net LBE is using semantic-based independence relation. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,391 INFO L135 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Starting large block encoding on Petri net that has 110 places, 102 transitions, 219 flow [2021-10-11 02:27:10,395 INFO L110 LiptonReduction]: Starting Lipton reduction on Petri net that has 110 places, 102 transitions, 219 flow [2021-10-11 02:27:10,397 INFO L74 FinitePrefix]: Start finitePrefix. Operand has 110 places, 102 transitions, 219 flow [2021-10-11 02:27:10,471 INFO L129 PetriNetUnfolder]: 2/99 cut-off events. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,472 INFO L130 PetriNetUnfolder]: For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,479 INFO L84 FinitePrefix]: Finished finitePrefix Result has 109 conditions, 99 events. 2/99 cut-off events. For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. Maximal size of possible extension queue 4. Compared 77 event pairs, 0 based on Foata normal form. 0/95 useless extension candidates. Maximal degree in co-relation 64. Up to 2 conditions per place. [2021-10-11 02:27:10,487 INFO L116 LiptonReduction]: Number of co-enabled transitions 1958 [2021-10-11 02:27:10,650 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,651 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,725 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,726 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,729 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,730 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,740 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,740 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,746 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,746 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,785 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,786 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,788 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,788 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,794 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,795 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:10,799 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:10,800 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,132 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 147.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 55 DAG size of output: 53 [2021-10-11 02:27:11,495 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,495 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,497 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,498 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,499 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,499 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,500 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,501 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,502 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,502 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,504 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,504 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,506 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,506 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,507 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,508 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,511 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,517 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,518 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,520 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,521 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,523 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,530 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,530 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,536 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,537 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,542 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,543 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,729 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,730 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,734 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,734 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,736 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,737 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,738 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,738 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,740 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,740 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,742 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,742 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,745 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,745 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,746 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,747 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,748 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,749 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,778 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,780 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,781 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,782 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,786 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,787 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,787 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,791 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,799 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,799 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,802 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,802 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,806 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,806 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,809 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,810 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,813 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,814 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,817 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,818 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,821 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,822 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,825 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,825 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,832 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,833 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:11,836 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:11,836 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,191 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,193 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,195 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,196 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,197 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,198 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,198 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,200 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,221 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,221 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,222 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,223 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,224 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,224 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,225 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,225 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,226 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,226 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,227 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,228 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,229 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,229 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,230 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,230 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,300 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,301 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,302 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,303 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,304 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,305 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,308 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,308 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,329 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,329 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,330 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,330 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,331 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,331 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,332 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,332 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,333 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,334 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,335 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,335 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,336 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,336 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,337 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,337 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,504 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,504 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,507 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,508 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,509 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,509 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,511 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,511 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,512 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,512 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,513 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,514 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,515 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,515 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,516 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,517 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,517 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,518 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,520 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,521 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,522 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,523 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,524 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,527 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,530 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,531 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,534 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,535 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,538 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,538 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,540 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,540 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,542 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,543 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,544 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,545 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,550 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,550 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,553 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,553 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,555 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,556 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,562 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,562 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,565 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,565 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,567 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,568 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,570 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,571 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,573 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,574 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,730 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,730 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,731 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,732 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,732 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,733 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,734 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,734 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,735 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,735 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,736 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,737 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,738 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,738 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,739 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,739 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,741 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,743 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,744 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,745 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,745 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,746 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,747 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,749 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,755 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,756 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:12,760 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:12,760 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:13,301 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 300.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 83 DAG size of output: 58 [2021-10-11 02:27:13,439 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 137.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 57 [2021-10-11 02:27:14,037 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 596.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 107 DAG size of output: 86 [2021-10-11 02:27:14,201 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 162.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 83 [2021-10-11 02:27:14,349 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,349 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,351 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,351 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,352 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,352 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,353 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,354 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,354 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,355 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,356 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,356 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,357 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,358 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,358 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,359 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,361 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,363 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,364 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,365 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,366 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,367 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,367 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,375 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,375 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,380 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,380 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,574 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,575 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,579 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,579 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,581 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,581 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,582 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,583 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,584 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,584 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,586 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,586 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,588 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,589 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,590 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,590 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,592 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,592 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,595 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,597 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,598 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,599 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,600 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,601 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,602 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,604 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,611 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,612 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,614 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,614 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,618 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,618 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,620 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,621 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,624 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,625 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,630 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,630 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,764 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,765 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,766 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,767 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,768 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,769 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,772 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,772 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,782 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,783 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,784 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,784 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,785 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,786 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,787 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,787 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,788 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,788 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,789 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,789 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,790 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,791 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,791 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,792 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,855 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,856 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,857 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,858 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,859 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,859 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,860 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,863 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,885 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,886 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,887 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,887 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,888 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,889 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,889 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,890 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,891 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,891 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,892 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,893 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,894 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,894 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:14,895 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:14,895 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,072 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,073 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,075 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,076 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,077 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,077 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,078 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,079 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,081 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,082 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,083 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,083 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,085 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,085 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,145 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,146 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,148 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,149 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,192 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,192 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,229 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,230 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,231 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,232 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,234 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,234 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,260 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,260 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,261 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,261 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,263 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,264 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,265 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,266 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,386 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,387 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,388 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,388 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,390 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,391 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,393 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,393 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,420 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,421 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,422 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,422 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,423 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,424 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,426 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,426 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,463 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,463 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,464 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,464 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,466 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,467 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,469 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,469 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,490 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,491 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,491 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,492 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,494 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,494 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,496 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,497 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,539 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,539 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,540 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,540 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,542 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,543 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,545 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,545 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,568 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,569 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,569 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,570 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,572 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,572 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,574 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,574 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,633 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,633 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,634 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,634 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,636 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,636 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,638 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,639 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,660 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,661 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,661 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,662 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,663 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,664 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,666 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,666 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,721 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,722 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,724 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,724 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,777 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,777 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,782 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,782 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,784 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,784 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,785 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,786 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,787 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,788 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,790 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,790 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,791 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,791 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,951 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,952 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,954 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,954 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,955 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,956 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,957 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,957 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,959 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,960 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,961 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,961 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:15,962 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:15,963 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,019 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,019 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,022 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,022 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,096 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,096 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,097 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,097 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,099 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,099 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,101 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,102 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,125 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,128 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,129 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,129 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,130 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,131 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,133 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,133 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,202 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,202 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,203 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,203 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,205 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,206 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,208 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,208 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,231 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,231 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,232 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,233 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,234 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,235 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,237 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,237 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,294 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,294 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,297 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,297 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,341 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,342 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,353 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,353 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,354 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,354 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,355 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,355 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,356 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,357 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,358 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,359 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,360 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,361 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,598 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,599 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,600 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,600 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,602 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,602 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,604 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,605 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,624 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,624 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,625 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,626 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,627 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,628 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,630 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,630 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,743 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,744 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,750 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,750 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,753 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,753 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,755 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,756 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,777 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,778 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,778 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,779 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,781 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,781 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:16,783 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:16,783 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,261 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 128.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 59 [2021-10-11 02:27:17,389 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 127.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 59 [2021-10-11 02:27:17,632 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 240.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 85 [2021-10-11 02:27:17,874 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 241.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 85 [2021-10-11 02:27:17,931 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,931 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,932 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,932 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,934 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,934 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,936 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,936 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,954 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,955 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,956 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,956 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,957 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,958 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:17,959 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:17,960 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,373 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,375 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,376 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,377 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,378 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,381 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,381 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,393 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,393 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,394 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,395 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,396 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,396 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,397 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,398 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,398 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,399 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,400 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,401 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,402 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,402 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,403 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,403 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,479 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,479 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,480 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,481 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,481 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,482 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,483 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,483 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,484 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,485 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,486 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,486 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,487 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,488 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,489 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,489 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,500 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,502 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,503 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,504 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,506 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,507 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:18,507 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:18,509 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,040 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,041 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,041 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,042 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,044 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,044 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,046 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,046 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,065 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,065 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,066 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,066 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,068 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,069 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,070 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,071 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,114 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,114 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,115 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,115 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,117 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,117 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,119 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,120 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,138 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,138 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,139 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,139 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,141 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,141 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,142 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,143 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,333 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,333 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,336 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,336 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,338 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,338 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,339 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,339 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,340 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,341 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,342 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,342 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,343 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,343 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,345 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,345 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,346 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,346 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,349 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,350 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,350 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,351 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,352 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,354 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,357 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,357 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,361 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,361 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,363 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,363 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,365 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,366 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,368 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,371 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,372 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,375 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,376 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,378 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,379 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,384 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,384 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,387 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,387 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,389 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,390 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,392 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,393 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,395 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,396 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,398 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,399 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,549 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,549 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,550 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,550 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,551 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,551 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,552 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,552 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,553 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,553 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,554 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,555 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,555 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,555 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,556 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,556 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,558 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,559 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,560 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,560 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,561 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,562 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,568 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,568 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,571 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,571 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:19,578 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:19,578 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,007 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 108.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 47 DAG size of output: 45 [2021-10-11 02:27:20,235 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,235 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,236 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,236 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,237 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,237 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,238 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,238 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,239 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,239 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,243 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,244 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,244 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,244 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,245 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,245 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,246 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,246 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,297 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,298 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,298 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,299 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,300 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,300 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,301 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,302 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,323 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,323 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,324 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,324 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,325 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,326 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,327 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,327 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,328 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,328 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,337 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,337 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,338 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,338 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,339 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,339 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,340 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,340 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,341 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,341 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,342 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,342 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,343 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,343 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,344 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,344 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,398 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,398 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,399 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,399 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,400 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,401 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,402 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,403 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,423 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,423 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,424 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,424 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,426 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,426 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:20,428 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:27:20,428 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:27:22,530 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 639.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 118 DAG size of output: 116 [2021-10-11 02:27:22,902 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 368.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 112 [2021-10-11 02:27:23,433 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 529.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 118 DAG size of output: 116 [2021-10-11 02:27:23,673 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 238.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 112 [2021-10-11 02:27:23,748 INFO L131 LiptonReduction]: Checked pairs total: 6536 [2021-10-11 02:27:23,748 INFO L133 LiptonReduction]: Total number of compositions: 85 [2021-10-11 02:27:23,754 INFO L100 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Start petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Operand has 40 places, 31 transitions, 77 flow [2021-10-11 02:27:23,849 INFO L122 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Finished petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Result 1598 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:23,851 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1598 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:23,857 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 8 [2021-10-11 02:27:23,857 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:23,858 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:23,858 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:23,863 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:23,863 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1606685663, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:23,872 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:23,873 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1157701831] [2021-10-11 02:27:23,873 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:24,008 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:24,124 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,125 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1157701831] [2021-10-11 02:27:24,126 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,127 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [1] imperfect sequences [] total 1 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,127 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [312411986] [2021-10-11 02:27:24,131 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2021-10-11 02:27:24,132 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:24,149 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,150 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,152 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1598 states. Second operand 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,367 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,368 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1382 states and 4536 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,369 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,370 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 7 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,370 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,406 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1382 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,407 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1166 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,408 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 1 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,438 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1166 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,557 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1166 to 1166. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,559 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1166 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,568 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1166 states to 1166 states and 3780 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,570 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1166 states and 3780 transitions. Word has length 7 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,570 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,571 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1166 states and 3780 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,571 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,571 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1166 states and 3780 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,573 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 11 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,573 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:24,574 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:24,574 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable0 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,574 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:24,574 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:24,575 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1653835619, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:24,575 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:24,575 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1402746281] [2021-10-11 02:27:24,575 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:24,810 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:24,922 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,923 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1402746281] [2021-10-11 02:27:24,923 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,923 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,923 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [753685007] [2021-10-11 02:27:24,925 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2021-10-11 02:27:24,925 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:24,925 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:24,926 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2021-10-11 02:27:24,926 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1166 states and 3780 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,001 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,001 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1166 states and 3636 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,002 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,002 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 10 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,002 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,012 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1166 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,013 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 950 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,014 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 3 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,020 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 950 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,055 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 950 to 950. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,055 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 950 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,062 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 950 states to 950 states and 2988 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,063 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 950 states and 2988 transitions. Word has length 10 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,063 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,063 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 950 states and 2988 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,063 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,063 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 950 states and 2988 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,068 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 14 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,068 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:25,068 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:25,068 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable1 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,068 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:25,069 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:25,069 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -90703051, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:25,069 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:25,070 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [618132861] [2021-10-11 02:27:25,070 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:25,290 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:25,768 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,769 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [618132861] [2021-10-11 02:27:25,769 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,769 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,770 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1601810791] [2021-10-11 02:27:25,770 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states [2021-10-11 02:27:25,770 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:25,771 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 8 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:25,771 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=14, Invalid=42, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2021-10-11 02:27:25,771 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 950 states and 2988 transitions. Second operand 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,722 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,723 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 2144 states and 6643 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,724 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 9 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,724 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 8 states. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:27:26,724 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,742 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 2144 [2021-10-11 02:27:26,742 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1554 [2021-10-11 02:27:26,743 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 10 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 10 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 7 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.5s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=37, Invalid=95, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2021-10-11 02:27:26,756 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1554 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,826 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1554 to 1050. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,826 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1050 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,837 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1050 states to 1050 states and 3234 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,837 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1050 states and 3234 transitions. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:27:26,838 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,838 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1050 states and 3234 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,838 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,838 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1050 states and 3234 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:26,846 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 15 [2021-10-11 02:27:26,847 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:26,847 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:26,847 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable2 [2021-10-11 02:27:26,847 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:26,850 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:26,850 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 789533733, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:26,850 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:26,851 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1891834171] [2021-10-11 02:27:26,851 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:27,075 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:27,326 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:27,326 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1891834171] [2021-10-11 02:27:27,326 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:27,327 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [7] imperfect sequences [] total 7 [2021-10-11 02:27:27,327 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [2105905923] [2021-10-11 02:27:27,327 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 9 states [2021-10-11 02:27:27,327 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:27,328 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 9 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:27,328 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=20, Invalid=52, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2021-10-11 02:27:27,329 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1050 states and 3234 transitions. Second operand 9 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,022 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,022 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 2042 states and 6317 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,023 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,023 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 9 states. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,024 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,040 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 2042 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,041 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1666 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,041 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 11 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 15 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=51, Invalid=105, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,050 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1666 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,092 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1666 to 1062. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,092 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1062 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,097 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1062 states to 1062 states and 3257 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,097 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1062 states and 3257 transitions. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,098 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,098 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1062 states and 3257 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,098 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 9 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,098 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1062 states and 3257 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,100 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 15 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,100 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:28,101 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,101 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable3 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,101 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:28,101 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:28,102 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1483270023, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:27:28,102 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:28,102 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1791550778] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,102 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:28,193 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:28,254 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,254 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1791550778] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,255 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,255 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,255 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [783104469] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,256 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2021-10-11 02:27:28,256 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:28,257 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,258 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,258 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1062 states and 3257 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,358 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,358 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 918 states and 2472 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,359 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,359 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,360 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,365 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 918 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,365 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 658 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,366 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 4 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 3 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,370 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 658 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,387 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 658 to 658. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,387 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 658 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,390 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 658 states to 658 states and 1693 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,390 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 658 states and 1693 transitions. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,390 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,391 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 658 states and 1693 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,391 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,391 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 658 states and 1693 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,392 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 17 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,392 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:28,392 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,393 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable4 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,393 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:28,393 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:28,393 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1721669734, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:28,394 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:28,394 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [857178872] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,394 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:28,483 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:28,532 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,533 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [857178872] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,533 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,533 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,533 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1786218745] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,534 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states [2021-10-11 02:27:28,534 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:28,534 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 5 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,534 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=8, Invalid=12, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,535 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 658 states and 1693 transitions. Second operand 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,583 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,583 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 500 states and 1196 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,584 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,584 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5 states. Word has length 16 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,585 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,588 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 500 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,588 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 396 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,588 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 5 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 4 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 1 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=18, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,590 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 396 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,600 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 396 to 396. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,600 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 396 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,602 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 396 states to 396 states and 927 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,602 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 396 states and 927 transitions. Word has length 16 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,602 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,602 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 396 states and 927 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,602 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,603 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 396 states and 927 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:28,604 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,604 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:28,604 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,604 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable5 [2021-10-11 02:27:28,605 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:28,605 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:28,605 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1595270309, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:28,605 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:28,606 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1232992514] [2021-10-11 02:27:28,606 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:28,776 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:29,342 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,342 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1232992514] [2021-10-11 02:27:29,342 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,342 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [9] imperfect sequences [] total 9 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,343 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [447176569] [2021-10-11 02:27:29,343 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states [2021-10-11 02:27:29,343 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:29,344 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,344 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=27, Invalid=83, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,344 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 396 states and 927 transitions. Second operand 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,900 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,900 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 567 states and 1309 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,900 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,900 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 11 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,901 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,904 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 567 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,904 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 523 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,904 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 10 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 10 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 15 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.4s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=34, Invalid=98, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,906 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 523 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,917 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 523 to 473. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,917 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 473 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,919 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 473 states to 473 states and 1097 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,919 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 473 states and 1097 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,919 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,919 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 473 states and 1097 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,920 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,920 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 473 states and 1097 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:29,921 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,921 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:29,922 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:29,922 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable6 [2021-10-11 02:27:29,922 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:29,922 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:29,922 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1712782079, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:27:29,923 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:29,923 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1999606874] [2021-10-11 02:27:29,923 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:30,062 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:30,722 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:30,723 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1999606874] [2021-10-11 02:27:30,723 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:30,723 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [9] imperfect sequences [] total 9 [2021-10-11 02:27:30,724 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [912620859] [2021-10-11 02:27:30,724 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states [2021-10-11 02:27:30,724 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:30,725 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:30,725 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=30, Invalid=80, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2021-10-11 02:27:30,725 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 473 states and 1097 transitions. Second operand 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,277 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,277 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 605 states and 1388 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,278 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,278 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 11 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,279 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,283 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 605 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,283 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 510 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,284 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 10 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 10 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 10 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.5s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=38, Invalid=94, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,286 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 510 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,298 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 510 to 452. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,298 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 452 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,300 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 452 states to 452 states and 1060 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,300 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 452 states and 1060 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,301 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,301 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 452 states and 1060 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,301 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,301 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 452 states and 1060 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,302 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,303 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:31,303 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:31,303 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable7 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,303 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:31,304 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:31,304 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 773067535, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:31,304 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:31,304 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2020441633] [2021-10-11 02:27:31,305 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:31,437 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:31,863 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,864 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2020441633] [2021-10-11 02:27:31,864 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,864 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [9] imperfect sequences [] total 9 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,864 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [545301662] [2021-10-11 02:27:31,865 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states [2021-10-11 02:27:31,865 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:31,865 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:31,866 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=27, Invalid=83, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2021-10-11 02:27:31,866 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 452 states and 1060 transitions. Second operand 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,655 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,655 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 691 states and 1592 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,656 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,656 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 11 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:32,656 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,661 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 691 [2021-10-11 02:27:32,661 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 629 [2021-10-11 02:27:32,662 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 15 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 14 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 23 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.5s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=61, Invalid=179, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=240 [2021-10-11 02:27:32,664 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 629 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,678 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 629 to 496. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,678 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 496 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,680 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 496 states to 496 states and 1157 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,680 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 496 states and 1157 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:32,681 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,681 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 496 states and 1157 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,681 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,681 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 496 states and 1157 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:32,682 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:27:32,683 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:32,683 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:32,683 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable8 [2021-10-11 02:27:32,683 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 10 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:32,684 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:32,684 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -577976469, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:27:32,684 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:32,684 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [285433705] [2021-10-11 02:27:32,684 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:32,881 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:33,171 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 115.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 44 DAG size of output: 28 [2021-10-11 02:27:33,484 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 111.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 47 DAG size of output: 29 [2021-10-11 02:27:33,653 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 142.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 67 DAG size of output: 38 [2021-10-11 02:27:33,922 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:33,923 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [285433705] [2021-10-11 02:27:33,923 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:33,923 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [9] imperfect sequences [] total 9 [2021-10-11 02:27:33,923 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1197501789] [2021-10-11 02:27:33,923 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states [2021-10-11 02:27:33,924 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:33,924 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:33,925 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=25, Invalid=85, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2021-10-11 02:27:33,925 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 496 states and 1157 transitions. Second operand 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:34,279 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 100.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 42 DAG size of output: 34 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,419 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 117.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 39 DAG size of output: 36 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,631 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,631 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1069 states and 2411 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,632 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 16 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,632 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 11 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,632 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,639 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1069 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,639 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 965 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,640 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 20 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 19 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 54 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 1.6s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=101, Invalid=319, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=420 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,643 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 965 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,660 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 965 to 520. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,660 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 520 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,662 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 520 states to 520 states and 1216 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,662 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 520 states and 1216 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,663 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,663 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 520 states and 1216 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,663 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,663 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 520 states and 1216 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:35,664 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,665 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:35,665 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:35,665 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable9 [2021-10-11 02:27:35,665 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 11 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:35,666 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:35,666 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -523638963, now seen corresponding path program 3 times [2021-10-11 02:27:35,666 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:35,666 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [629503073] [2021-10-11 02:27:35,666 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:35,801 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:36,267 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 118.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 52 DAG size of output: 34 [2021-10-11 02:27:36,426 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:36,426 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [629503073] [2021-10-11 02:27:36,426 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:36,426 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2021-10-11 02:27:36,427 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [772605545] [2021-10-11 02:27:36,427 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states [2021-10-11 02:27:36,427 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:36,428 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 10 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:36,428 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=21, Invalid=69, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:27:36,428 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 520 states and 1216 transitions. Second operand 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,650 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,650 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 748 states and 1744 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,651 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,651 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 10 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,651 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,653 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 748 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,653 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 220 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,653 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 17 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 15 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 21 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 1.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=75, Invalid=197, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=272 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,654 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 220 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,659 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 220 to 192. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,659 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 192 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,660 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 192 states to 192 states and 407 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,660 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 192 states and 407 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,660 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,661 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 192 states and 407 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,661 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,661 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 192 states and 407 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,661 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,662 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:37,662 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:37,662 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable10 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,662 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 12 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:37,662 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:37,663 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -150088855, now seen corresponding path program 3 times [2021-10-11 02:27:37,663 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:37,663 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [817981934] [2021-10-11 02:27:37,663 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:37,755 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:37,812 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,812 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [817981934] [2021-10-11 02:27:37,812 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,813 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,813 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1098678593] [2021-10-11 02:27:37,813 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2021-10-11 02:27:37,813 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:37,814 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,814 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=18, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,814 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 192 states and 407 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,880 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,880 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 159 states and 339 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,881 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,881 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,881 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,882 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 159 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,882 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 146 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,883 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 6 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=16, Invalid=26, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,884 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 146 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,887 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 146 to 146. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,887 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 146 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,888 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 146 states to 146 states and 315 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,888 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 146 states and 315 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,888 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,888 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 146 states and 315 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,888 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,889 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 146 states and 315 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:37,890 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 26 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,891 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:37,891 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:37,891 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable11 [2021-10-11 02:27:37,891 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 13 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:37,892 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:37,892 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 585542438, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:27:37,892 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:37,892 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [687029620] [2021-10-11 02:27:37,892 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:38,055 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:38,149 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,150 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [687029620] [2021-10-11 02:27:38,150 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,151 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,151 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1056452881] [2021-10-11 02:27:38,152 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states [2021-10-11 02:27:38,152 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:38,153 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 5 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,153 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=7, Invalid=13, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,153 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 146 states and 315 transitions. Second operand 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,211 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,211 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 194 states and 414 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,212 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,212 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5 states. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,214 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,215 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 194 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,215 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 76 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,215 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 6 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=17, Invalid=25, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,216 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 76 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,217 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 76 to 76. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,218 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 76 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,218 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 76 states to 76 states and 145 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,218 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 76 states and 145 transitions. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,219 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,219 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 76 states and 145 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,219 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,219 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 76 states and 145 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,221 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 26 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,221 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:38,221 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:38,221 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable12 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,222 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 14 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:38,222 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:38,222 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1183514970, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:27:38,222 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:38,223 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1030114627] [2021-10-11 02:27:38,223 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:38,418 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:38,755 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,756 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1030114627] [2021-10-11 02:27:38,756 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,756 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,756 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [2123650085] [2021-10-11 02:27:38,757 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states [2021-10-11 02:27:38,757 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:38,757 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 10 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:38,757 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=24, Invalid=66, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:27:38,758 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 76 states and 145 transitions. Second operand 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,189 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,189 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 138 states and 261 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,190 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,190 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 10 states. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,190 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,190 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 138 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,191 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 65 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,191 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 12 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 18 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.3s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=45, Invalid=111, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,191 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 65 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,193 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 65 to 65. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,193 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 65 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,193 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 65 states to 65 states and 117 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,193 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 65 states and 117 transitions. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,193 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,193 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 65 states and 117 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,193 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,194 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 65 states and 117 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,194 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 26 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,194 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:27:39,194 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:27:39,194 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable13 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,194 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 15 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:27:39,195 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:27:39,195 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1531082074, now seen corresponding path program 3 times [2021-10-11 02:27:39,195 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:39,195 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [375681586] [2021-10-11 02:27:39,195 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:27:39,357 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:27:39,816 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,816 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [375681586] [2021-10-11 02:27:39,816 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,816 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [9] imperfect sequences [] total 9 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,817 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [165020999] [2021-10-11 02:27:39,817 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states [2021-10-11 02:27:39,817 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:27:39,818 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 11 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:27:39,818 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=25, Invalid=85, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2021-10-11 02:27:39,818 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 65 states and 117 transitions. Second operand 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,243 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,243 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 68 states and 124 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,243 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,243 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 11 states. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,243 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,243 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 68 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,243 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 0 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 16 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 13 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 15 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.5s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=57, Invalid=153, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=210 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 0 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 0 to 0. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 0 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 0 states to 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 0 states and 0 transitions. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,244 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,245 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,245 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,245 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. No accepting run. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,245 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable14 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,247 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction CFG 11.10 02:27:40 BasicIcfg [2021-10-11 02:27:40,248 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:40,248 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Witness Printer---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:40,248 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Witness Printer... [2021-10-11 02:27:40,248 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Witness Printer initialized [2021-10-11 02:27:40,249 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGCatcher from plugin Witness Printer for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:27:10" (3/4) ... [2021-10-11 02:27:40,251 INFO L137 WitnessPrinter]: Generating witness for correct program [2021-10-11 02:27:40,256 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,257 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,257 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P2 [2021-10-11 02:27:40,268 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 176 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:27:40,269 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 44 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:27:40,270 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 3 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:27:40,271 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 2 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:27:40,384 INFO L141 WitnessManager]: Wrote witness to /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_95b8e171-e6c1-4ca6-9aee-445e6516311e/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/witness.graphml [2021-10-11 02:27:40,385 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Witness Printer---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:27:40,385 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Toolchain (without parser) took 37350.86 ms. Allocated memory was 115.3 MB in the beginning and 713.0 MB in the end (delta: 597.7 MB). Free memory was 75.8 MB in the beginning and 473.3 MB in the end (delta: -397.5 MB). Peak memory consumption was 200.5 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,386 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CDTParser took 0.32 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 94.5 MB in the beginning and 94.4 MB in the end (delta: 82.5 kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,386 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 951.11 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 75.6 MB in the beginning and 61.7 MB in the end (delta: 13.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,386 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Procedure Inliner took 93.25 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 61.7 MB in the beginning and 57.7 MB in the end (delta: 4.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,387 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Preprocessor took 83.89 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 57.7 MB in the beginning and 54.2 MB in the end (delta: 3.5 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,387 INFO L168 Benchmark]: RCFGBuilder took 5924.78 ms. Allocated memory was 115.3 MB in the beginning and 184.5 MB in the end (delta: 69.2 MB). Free memory was 54.2 MB in the beginning and 142.1 MB in the end (delta: -87.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 84.0 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,388 INFO L168 Benchmark]: TraceAbstraction took 30151.05 ms. Allocated memory was 184.5 MB in the beginning and 713.0 MB in the end (delta: 528.5 MB). Free memory was 142.1 MB in the beginning and 488.0 MB in the end (delta: -345.8 MB). Peak memory consumption was 183.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,388 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Witness Printer took 136.67 ms. Allocated memory is still 713.0 MB. Free memory was 488.0 MB in the beginning and 473.3 MB in the end (delta: 14.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:27:40,391 INFO L339 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### End [Toolchain 1] ####################### --- Results --- * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.core: - StatisticsResult: Toolchain Benchmarks Benchmark results are: * CDTParser took 0.32 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 94.5 MB in the beginning and 94.4 MB in the end (delta: 82.5 kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 951.11 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 75.6 MB in the beginning and 61.7 MB in the end (delta: 13.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Procedure Inliner took 93.25 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 61.7 MB in the beginning and 57.7 MB in the end (delta: 4.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Preprocessor took 83.89 ms. Allocated memory is still 115.3 MB. Free memory was 57.7 MB in the beginning and 54.2 MB in the end (delta: 3.5 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * RCFGBuilder took 5924.78 ms. Allocated memory was 115.3 MB in the beginning and 184.5 MB in the end (delta: 69.2 MB). Free memory was 54.2 MB in the beginning and 142.1 MB in the end (delta: -87.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 84.0 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * TraceAbstraction took 30151.05 ms. Allocated memory was 184.5 MB in the beginning and 713.0 MB in the end (delta: 528.5 MB). Free memory was 142.1 MB in the beginning and 488.0 MB in the end (delta: -345.8 MB). Peak memory consumption was 183.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Witness Printer took 136.67 ms. Allocated memory is still 713.0 MB. Free memory was 488.0 MB in the beginning and 473.3 MB in the end (delta: 14.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: - StatisticsResult: PetriNetLargeBlockEncoding benchmarks 1123 VarBasedMoverChecksPositive, 68 VarBasedMoverChecksNegative, 11 SemBasedMoverChecksPositive, 57 SemBasedMoverChecksNegative, 0 SemBasedMoverChecksUnknown, SemBasedMoverCheckTime: 5.2s, 92 CheckedPairsTotal, LiptonReductionStatistics: ReductionTime: 13.3s, 110 PlacesBefore, 40 PlacesAfterwards, 102 TransitionsBefore, 31 TransitionsAfterwards, 1958 CoEnabledTransitionPairs, 6 FixpointIterations, 37 TrivialSequentialCompositions, 40 ConcurrentSequentialCompositions, 0 TrivialYvCompositions, 7 ConcurrentYvCompositions, 1 ChoiceCompositions, 85 TotalNumberOfCompositions, 6536 MoverChecksTotal - PositiveResult [Line: 18]: call to reach_error is unreachable For all program executions holds that call to reach_error is unreachable at this location - PositiveResult [Line: 18]: call to reach_error is unreachable For all program executions holds that call to reach_error is unreachable at this location - AllSpecificationsHoldResult: All specifications hold 2 specifications checked. All of them hold - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data CFG has 4 procedures, 101 locations, 2 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. VerificationResult: SAFE, OverallTime: 29.8s, OverallIterations: 15, TraceHistogramMax: 1, AutomataDifference: 8.0s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 13.4s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: 459 SDtfs, 713 SDslu, 1628 SDs, 0 SdLazy, 1891 SolverSat, 494 SolverUnsat, 0 SolverUnknown, 0 SolverNotchecked, 4.4s Time, PredicateUnifierStatistics: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 146 GetRequests, 7 SyntacticMatches, 5 SemanticMatches, 134 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 181 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 5.9s Time, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=1598occurred in iteration=0, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: 0.4s AutomataMinimizationTime, 15 MinimizatonAttempts, 1822 StatesRemovedByMinimization, 7 NontrivialMinimizations, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.1s SsaConstructionTime, 2.1s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 5.2s InterpolantComputationTime, 269 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 269 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 15 NumberOfCheckSat, 254 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 66973 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 15 InterpolantComputations, 15 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available RESULT: Ultimate proved your program to be correct! Received shutdown request...