./Ultimate.py --spec ../../sv-benchmarks/c/properties/unreach-call.prp --file ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.opt.i --full-output --architecture 32bit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checking for ERROR reachability Using default analysis Version 7b2dab56 Calling Ultimate with: /usr/bin/java -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/config -Xmx15G -Xms4m -jar /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.5.800.v20200727-1323.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data -tc /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/TaipanReach.xml -i ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.opt.i -s /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf --cacsl2boogietranslator.entry.function main --witnessprinter.witness.directory /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI --witnessprinter.witness.filename witness.graphml --witnessprinter.write.witness.besides.input.file false --witnessprinter.graph.data.specification CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) --witnessprinter.graph.data.producer Taipan --witnessprinter.graph.data.architecture 32bit --witnessprinter.graph.data.programhash 155d837dfa9635bd842d4430e4de6c35fe242d06 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Execution finished normally Writing output log to file Ultimate.log Result: TRUE --- Real Ultimate output --- This is Ultimate 0.2.0-7b2dab5 [2021-10-11 02:25:34,978 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2021-10-11 02:25:34,988 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,022 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,023 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,024 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,026 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,029 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,032 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,033 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,034 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,036 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,037 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,038 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,039 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,041 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,042 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,043 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,046 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,048 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,051 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,053 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,055 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,056 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,059 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,059 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,060 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,061 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,062 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,063 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,063 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,072 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,074 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,076 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,077 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,077 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,078 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,078 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,079 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,080 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:25:35,081 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,083 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf [2021-10-11 02:25:35,130 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2021-10-11 02:25:35,132 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2021-10-11 02:25:35,134 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Boogie Procedure Inliner differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:25:35,134 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * User list type=DISABLED [2021-10-11 02:25:35,134 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Abstract Interpretation differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:25:35,134 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Explicit value domain=true [2021-10-11 02:25:35,135 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain for RCFG-of-the-future=PoormanAbstractDomain [2021-10-11 02:25:35,135 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Octagon Domain=false [2021-10-11 02:25:35,135 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain=CompoundDomain [2021-10-11 02:25:35,136 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check feasibility of abstract posts with an SMT solver=true [2021-10-11 02:25:35,142 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use the RCFG-of-the-future interface=true [2021-10-11 02:25:35,143 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Interval Domain=false [2021-10-11 02:25:35,143 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Sifa differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:25:35,144 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Call Summarizer=TopInputCallSummarizer [2021-10-11 02:25:35,144 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Simplification Technique=SIMPLIFY_QUICK [2021-10-11 02:25:35,145 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:25:35,145 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2021-10-11 02:25:35,145 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2021-10-11 02:25:35,145 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2021-10-11 02:25:35,146 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:25:35,146 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:25:35,146 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:25:35,147 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:25:35,147 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Adapt memory model on pointer casts if necessary=true [2021-10-11 02:25:35,147 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2021-10-11 02:25:35,147 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2021-10-11 02:25:35,148 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2021-10-11 02:25:35,148 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:25:35,149 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:25:35,150 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2021-10-11 02:25:35,150 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2021-10-11 02:25:35,151 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:25:35,151 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2021-10-11 02:25:35,152 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2021-10-11 02:25:35,152 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:35,152 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2021-10-11 02:25:35,152 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2021-10-11 02:25:35,153 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement exception blacklist=NONE [2021-10-11 02:25:35,153 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode [2021-10-11 02:25:35,153 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract interpretation Mode=USE_PREDICATES WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 (file:/tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/plugins/com.sun.xml.bind_2.2.0.v201505121915.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int) WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator: Entry function -> main Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness directory -> /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness filename -> witness.graphml Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Write witness besides input file -> false Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data specification -> CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data producer -> Taipan Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data architecture -> 32bit Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data programhash -> 155d837dfa9635bd842d4430e4de6c35fe242d06 [2021-10-11 02:25:35,466 INFO L75 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2021-10-11 02:25:35,504 INFO L261 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2021-10-11 02:25:35,509 INFO L217 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2021-10-11 02:25:35,511 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2021-10-11 02:25:35,512 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2021-10-11 02:25:35,512 INFO L432 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.opt.i [2021-10-11 02:25:35,609 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/19a170550/c3b035c7053d41ae8a982a669138d222/FLAG626038b0e [2021-10-11 02:25:36,250 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2021-10-11 02:25:36,253 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.opt.i [2021-10-11 02:25:36,286 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/19a170550/c3b035c7053d41ae8a982a669138d222/FLAG626038b0e [2021-10-11 02:25:36,447 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/19a170550/c3b035c7053d41ae8a982a669138d222 [2021-10-11 02:25:36,450 INFO L299 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2021-10-11 02:25:36,452 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 6 elements. [2021-10-11 02:25:36,457 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:36,457 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2021-10-11 02:25:36,461 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2021-10-11 02:25:36,463 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:25:36" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:36,465 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@4e4054e0 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:36, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:25:36,465 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:25:36" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:36,473 INFO L145 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2021-10-11 02:25:36,552 INFO L178 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2021-10-11 02:25:36,797 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.opt.i[951,964] [2021-10-11 02:25:37,079 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2021-10-11 02:25:37,105 INFO L203 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2021-10-11 02:25:37,122 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/safe035_power.opt.i[951,964] [2021-10-11 02:25:37,202 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2021-10-11 02:25:37,285 INFO L208 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2021-10-11 02:25:37,286 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37 WrapperNode [2021-10-11 02:25:37,286 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:37,287 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:37,288 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Procedure Inliner... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,288 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Procedure Inliner initialized [2021-10-11 02:25:37,297 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,322 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer Inliner from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,383 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:37,384 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:37,384 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,385 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2021-10-11 02:25:37,403 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,404 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,411 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,421 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,447 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,473 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,480 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,487 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:37,493 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:37,493 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2021-10-11 02:25:37,493 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2021-10-11 02:25:37,495 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (1/1) ... No working directory specified, using /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/z3 Starting monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2021-10-11 02:25:37,608 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2021-10-11 02:25:37,608 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_begin [2021-10-11 02:25:37,609 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2021-10-11 02:25:37,609 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2021-10-11 02:25:37,609 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:25:37,609 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:25:37,611 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:25:37,611 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:25:37,611 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P2 [2021-10-11 02:25:37,612 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P2 [2021-10-11 02:25:37,612 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2021-10-11 02:25:37,612 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_end [2021-10-11 02:25:37,612 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2021-10-11 02:25:37,612 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2021-10-11 02:25:37,615 WARN L209 CfgBuilder]: User set CodeBlockSize to LoopFreeBlock but program contains fork statements. Overwriting the user preferences and setting CodeBlockSize to SingleStatement [2021-10-11 02:25:42,730 INFO L294 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2021-10-11 02:25:42,731 INFO L299 CfgBuilder]: Removed 10 assume(true) statements. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,735 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:25:42 BoogieIcfgContainer [2021-10-11 02:25:42,735 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:42,737 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:25:42,737 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2021-10-11 02:25:42,741 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2021-10-11 02:25:42,741 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:25:36" (1/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:42,742 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@25c22fc9 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 11.10 02:25:42, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:25:42,742 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:25:37" (2/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:42,743 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@25c22fc9 and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 11.10 02:25:42, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:25:42,743 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:25:42" (3/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:25:42,744 INFO L111 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG safe035_power.opt.i [2021-10-11 02:25:42,764 WARN L169 ceAbstractionStarter]: Switching off computation of Hoare annotation because input is a concurrent program [2021-10-11 02:25:42,765 INFO L180 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:false NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2021-10-11 02:25:42,768 INFO L192 ceAbstractionStarter]: Appying trace abstraction to program that has 2 error locations. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,769 INFO L354 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 1 thread instances. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,847 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,848 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,848 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,848 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,848 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,848 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,848 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,849 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,849 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,849 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,849 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,850 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,850 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,850 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,851 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,851 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,851 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,852 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,852 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,852 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,852 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,853 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,853 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,854 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,854 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,855 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,855 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,855 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,855 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,856 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,856 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,856 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,856 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,856 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,856 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,857 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,857 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,857 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,857 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,858 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,858 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,858 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,858 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,858 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,859 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,859 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,859 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,859 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,860 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,860 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,860 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,860 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,860 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,860 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,861 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,861 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,861 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,861 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,861 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,863 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,863 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,863 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,864 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,865 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,865 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,865 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,865 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,866 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,866 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,866 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,866 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,866 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,867 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,867 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,870 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,870 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,870 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,870 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,871 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,871 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,871 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,871 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,872 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,873 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,873 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,873 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,879 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,879 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,880 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,880 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,880 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,880 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,880 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,882 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,883 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,883 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,883 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,884 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,884 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,884 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,884 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,884 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,884 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,884 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,885 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,886 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,886 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,886 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,886 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,886 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,886 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,886 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,887 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,888 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,888 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,888 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,888 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,891 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,891 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,891 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,891 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,891 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,891 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,892 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,892 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,892 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,892 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,892 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,893 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,893 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,893 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,894 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,894 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,894 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,894 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,895 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,897 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,897 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,897 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,897 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,897 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,897 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,897 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,898 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,898 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,898 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,898 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,898 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,898 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,899 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,899 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,899 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,899 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,899 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,899 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,900 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,900 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,900 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,900 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,900 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,901 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,901 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,901 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,901 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,901 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,902 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,903 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite79| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,904 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,904 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,904 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite76| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,904 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,904 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite70| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,905 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,909 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,909 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite73| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,909 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,910 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,911 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite80| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,912 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,912 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,913 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,913 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,914 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,915 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,916 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,916 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,924 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,924 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite79| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite76| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,925 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite70| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,926 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,926 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,926 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite73| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,926 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,926 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,926 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite80| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,927 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,928 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,928 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,930 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,930 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite82| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,930 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,930 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite86| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,930 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite85| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,930 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite84| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,930 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite83| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,931 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,931 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite82| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,931 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,931 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite86| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,931 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite85| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,931 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite84| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,932 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite83| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,932 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,932 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,932 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,932 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,935 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,936 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite86| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,936 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,936 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite85| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,936 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,936 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite84| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,936 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,937 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite83| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,937 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite82| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,937 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,937 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite81| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,937 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite80| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,937 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,938 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,938 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite69| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,938 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,938 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,938 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,938 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,938 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,939 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,939 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,939 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P2Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,939 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,939 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite75| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,939 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,940 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite74| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,940 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite73| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,940 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite72| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,940 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite70| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,940 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite71| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,940 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,940 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,941 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,941 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite79| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,941 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,941 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite78| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,941 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,941 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite77| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,941 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,942 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P2Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite76| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,944 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,944 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,945 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,945 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,945 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,945 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,945 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,945 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,946 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,946 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,946 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,946 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,946 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,946 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,946 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,947 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,948 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,948 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,949 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,949 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,949 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,949 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,949 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,949 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,950 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,950 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,950 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,950 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,950 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,950 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,950 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,951 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,951 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,951 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,951 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,951 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,951 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,952 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,952 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,952 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,952 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,952 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,952 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,952 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,953 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,953 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,953 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,953 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,953 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,953 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork2_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,953 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~nondet24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,954 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,954 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,954 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,954 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork2_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,956 INFO L149 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 0 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:42,967 INFO L253 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 6 error locations. [2021-10-11 02:25:43,005 INFO L377 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interprodecural is true [2021-10-11 02:25:43,005 INFO L378 AbstractCegarLoop]: Hoare is true [2021-10-11 02:25:43,005 INFO L379 AbstractCegarLoop]: Compute interpolants for FPandBP [2021-10-11 02:25:43,005 INFO L380 AbstractCegarLoop]: Backedges is STRAIGHT_LINE [2021-10-11 02:25:43,006 INFO L381 AbstractCegarLoop]: Determinization is PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2021-10-11 02:25:43,006 INFO L382 AbstractCegarLoop]: Difference is false [2021-10-11 02:25:43,006 INFO L383 AbstractCegarLoop]: Minimize is MINIMIZE_SEVPA [2021-10-11 02:25:43,006 INFO L387 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0==of CEGAR loop == AllErrorsAtOnce======== [2021-10-11 02:25:43,021 INFO L120 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Petri net LBE is using semantic-based independence relation. [2021-10-11 02:25:43,024 INFO L135 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Starting large block encoding on Petri net that has 110 places, 102 transitions, 219 flow [2021-10-11 02:25:43,028 INFO L110 LiptonReduction]: Starting Lipton reduction on Petri net that has 110 places, 102 transitions, 219 flow [2021-10-11 02:25:43,030 INFO L74 FinitePrefix]: Start finitePrefix. Operand has 110 places, 102 transitions, 219 flow [2021-10-11 02:25:43,113 INFO L129 PetriNetUnfolder]: 2/99 cut-off events. [2021-10-11 02:25:43,114 INFO L130 PetriNetUnfolder]: For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. [2021-10-11 02:25:43,118 INFO L84 FinitePrefix]: Finished finitePrefix Result has 109 conditions, 99 events. 2/99 cut-off events. For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. Maximal size of possible extension queue 4. Compared 77 event pairs, 0 based on Foata normal form. 0/95 useless extension candidates. Maximal degree in co-relation 64. Up to 2 conditions per place. [2021-10-11 02:25:43,124 INFO L116 LiptonReduction]: Number of co-enabled transitions 1958 [2021-10-11 02:25:43,282 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,283 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,349 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,350 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,353 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,354 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,361 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,361 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,368 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,412 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,413 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,415 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,415 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,421 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,421 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:43,425 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:43,426 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,087 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,088 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,089 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,093 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,096 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,096 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,097 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,097 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,099 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,100 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,101 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,102 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,103 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,103 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,105 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,105 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,108 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,109 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,110 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,112 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,113 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,126 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,134 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,135 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,144 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,144 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,152 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,153 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,384 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,385 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,388 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,389 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,390 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,390 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,393 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,394 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,395 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,395 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,397 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,397 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,398 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,399 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,400 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,400 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,402 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,403 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,406 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,407 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,408 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,409 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,410 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,415 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,419 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,419 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,425 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,425 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,430 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,430 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,434 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,435 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,438 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,438 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,441 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,442 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,447 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,448 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,451 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,451 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,454 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,454 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,462 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,463 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,467 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,467 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,470 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,470 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,475 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,475 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,478 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,479 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,856 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,859 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,862 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,863 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,864 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,867 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,868 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,873 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,891 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,892 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,916 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,917 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,918 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,918 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,919 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,920 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,921 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,921 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,923 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,923 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,924 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,925 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:44,926 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:44,926 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,041 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,043 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,045 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,046 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,047 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,048 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,048 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,053 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,074 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,074 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,076 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,076 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,077 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,078 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,079 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,079 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,080 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,081 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,082 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,083 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,084 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,084 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,085 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,086 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,262 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,262 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,272 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,273 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,274 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,275 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,276 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,277 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,277 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,278 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,279 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,279 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,281 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,281 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,282 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,283 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,284 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,284 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,287 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,288 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,289 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,290 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,291 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,293 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,297 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,297 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,303 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,303 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,305 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,306 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,307 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,308 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,310 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,310 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,313 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,313 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,321 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 7, 4, 7, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,321 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,469 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,470 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,471 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,471 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,472 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,473 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,473 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,474 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,475 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,475 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,476 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,476 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,477 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,506 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,507 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,507 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,510 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,511 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,512 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,514 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,516 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,522 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,525 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,525 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,529 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,530 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,534 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:45,534 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:45,988 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 241.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 83 DAG size of output: 58 [2021-10-11 02:25:46,118 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 129.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 57 [2021-10-11 02:25:46,800 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 680.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 107 DAG size of output: 86 [2021-10-11 02:25:46,975 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 174.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 83 [2021-10-11 02:25:47,161 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,162 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,163 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,163 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,164 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,165 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,166 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,166 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,167 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,167 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,168 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,168 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,169 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,169 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,170 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,170 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,173 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,174 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,175 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,176 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,177 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,178 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,181 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,181 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,185 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,186 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,190 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,190 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,326 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,327 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,330 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,330 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,331 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,332 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,333 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,333 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,334 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,335 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,336 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,336 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,338 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,338 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,339 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,340 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,341 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,341 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,344 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,345 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,346 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,347 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,348 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,350 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,355 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,355 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,360 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,360 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,363 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,364 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,366 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,366 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,368 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,370 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,371 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,376 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,376 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,474 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,474 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,475 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,476 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,477 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,477 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,478 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,478 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,479 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,480 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,480 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,481 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,482 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,482 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,483 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,483 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,502 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,502 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,503 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,504 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,505 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,509 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,514 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,515 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,596 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,598 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,599 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,600 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,600 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,601 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,602 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,603 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,658 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,658 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,659 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,660 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,661 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,662 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,662 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,663 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,663 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,664 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,665 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,666 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,666 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,667 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,667 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,668 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,829 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,830 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,832 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,832 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,833 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,834 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,835 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,835 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,837 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,838 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,839 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,840 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,841 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,841 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,892 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,893 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,895 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,896 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,938 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,939 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,939 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,940 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,941 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,942 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,944 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,944 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,967 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,967 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,968 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,968 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,970 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,972 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:47,974 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:47,974 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,085 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,085 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,086 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,086 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,088 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,089 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,091 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,091 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,113 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,113 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,114 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,114 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,116 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,116 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,118 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,119 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,155 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,156 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,157 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,157 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,160 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,160 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,162 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,163 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,190 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,190 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,191 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,192 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,193 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,194 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,196 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,196 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,238 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,238 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,239 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,239 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,241 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,242 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,244 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,244 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,267 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,270 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,271 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,272 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,274 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,274 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,276 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,277 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,339 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,339 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,340 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,340 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,342 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,342 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,344 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,345 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,366 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,367 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,367 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,368 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,370 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,370 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,372 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,373 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,461 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,462 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,465 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,465 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,527 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,528 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,537 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,537 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,541 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,542 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,543 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,543 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,546 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,546 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,548 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,549 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,550 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,550 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,727 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,728 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,730 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,731 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,732 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,733 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,734 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,734 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,736 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,737 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,739 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,739 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,740 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,741 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,810 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,810 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,813 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,814 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,850 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,850 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,851 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,851 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,853 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,853 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,855 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,855 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,876 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,877 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,877 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,878 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,879 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,880 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,881 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,882 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,943 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,943 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,944 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,944 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,949 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,949 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,951 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,952 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,974 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,974 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,975 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,975 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,977 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,977 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:48,979 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:48,979 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,038 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,038 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,041 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,041 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,086 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,086 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,097 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,098 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,099 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,099 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,100 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,101 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,102 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,103 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,104 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,104 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,106 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,106 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,368 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,369 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,370 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,371 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,371 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,373 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,373 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,391 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,391 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,392 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,392 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,394 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,394 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,396 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,396 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,511 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,511 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,512 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,512 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,514 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,514 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,516 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,517 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,538 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,538 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,539 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,539 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,541 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,541 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,543 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:49,544 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:49,945 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 115.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 59 [2021-10-11 02:25:50,062 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 115.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 59 [2021-10-11 02:25:50,265 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 202.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 85 [2021-10-11 02:25:50,442 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 165.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 85 [2021-10-11 02:25:50,499 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,499 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,500 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,500 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,502 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,503 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,506 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,506 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,523 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,524 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,524 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,525 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,527 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,527 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,529 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,529 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,907 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,908 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,909 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,910 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,911 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,912 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,915 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,915 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,929 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,930 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,931 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,931 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,932 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,932 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,933 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,934 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,934 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,935 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,936 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,936 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,937 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,938 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:50,938 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:50,939 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,004 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,004 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,005 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,005 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,006 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,007 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,007 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,008 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,008 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,009 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,009 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,010 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,011 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,011 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,012 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,012 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,018 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,019 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,020 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,021 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,022 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,023 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,023 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,025 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,510 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,510 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,511 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,511 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,514 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,514 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,516 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,517 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,539 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,539 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,540 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,540 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,542 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,542 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,544 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,544 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,591 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,592 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,593 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,593 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,595 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,595 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,597 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,597 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,615 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,615 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,616 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,617 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,618 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,618 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,620 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,620 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,819 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,820 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,822 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,823 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,824 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,824 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,825 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,826 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,826 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,827 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,827 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,828 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,829 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,829 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,830 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,830 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,831 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,831 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,834 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,834 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,835 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,836 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,837 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,838 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,840 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,841 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,845 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,845 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,846 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,847 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,848 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,849 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,852 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,853 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,855 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,856 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,859 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,859 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,861 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,861 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,865 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,866 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,868 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,868 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,871 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,872 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,874 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,874 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,984 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,985 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,985 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,986 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,986 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,987 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,988 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,988 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,989 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,989 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,990 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,990 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,991 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,991 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,992 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,992 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,994 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,994 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,995 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,996 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,996 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,997 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:51,997 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:51,999 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,005 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,005 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,009 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,009 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,552 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,552 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,553 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,553 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,554 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,581 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,584 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,584 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,585 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,585 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,590 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,591 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,592 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,593 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,593 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,594 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,595 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,659 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,661 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,661 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,662 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,663 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,663 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,664 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,665 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,684 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,685 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,686 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,686 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,687 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,687 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,688 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,689 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,689 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,690 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,697 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,698 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,699 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,699 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,700 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,700 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,701 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,701 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,702 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,702 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,703 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,703 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,704 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,704 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,705 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,705 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,749 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,749 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,750 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,750 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,751 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,752 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,753 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,754 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,774 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,774 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,775 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,775 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,777 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,777 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:52,779 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:25:52,779 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:25:54,302 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 447.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 118 DAG size of output: 116 [2021-10-11 02:25:54,485 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 182.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 112 [2021-10-11 02:25:54,837 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 351.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 118 DAG size of output: 116 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,056 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 218.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 112 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,145 INFO L131 LiptonReduction]: Checked pairs total: 6536 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,145 INFO L133 LiptonReduction]: Total number of compositions: 85 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,152 INFO L100 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Start petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Operand has 40 places, 31 transitions, 77 flow [2021-10-11 02:25:55,261 INFO L122 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Finished petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Result 1598 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,263 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1598 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,269 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 8 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,269 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:25:55,270 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:25:55,271 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:25:55,281 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:25:55,282 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1606685663, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:25:55,293 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:55,293 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [303561580] [2021-10-11 02:25:55,294 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:25:55,504 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:25:55,602 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,603 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [303561580] [2021-10-11 02:25:55,603 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,604 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [1] imperfect sequences [] total 1 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,604 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [261252928] [2021-10-11 02:25:55,609 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2021-10-11 02:25:55,609 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:55,624 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,624 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,627 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1598 states. Second operand 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,817 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,817 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1382 states and 4536 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,818 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,819 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 7 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,819 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,852 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1382 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,852 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1166 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,853 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 1 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,883 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1166 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,975 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1166 to 1166. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,976 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1166 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,986 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1166 states to 1166 states and 3780 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,987 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1166 states and 3780 transitions. Word has length 7 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,988 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,988 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1166 states and 3780 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,988 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,988 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1166 states and 3780 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:55,991 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 11 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,991 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:25:55,991 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:25:55,991 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable0 [2021-10-11 02:25:55,992 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:25:55,992 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:25:55,992 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1653835619, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:25:55,993 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:55,993 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [451097933] [2021-10-11 02:25:55,993 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:25:56,278 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:25:56,425 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,425 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [451097933] [2021-10-11 02:25:56,425 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,426 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,426 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1883233904] [2021-10-11 02:25:56,427 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2021-10-11 02:25:56,427 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:56,428 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,428 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,429 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1166 states and 3780 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,509 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,509 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1166 states and 3636 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,509 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,510 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 10 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,510 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,520 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1166 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,520 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 950 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,521 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 3 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,529 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 950 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,561 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 950 to 950. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,561 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 950 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,567 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 950 states to 950 states and 2988 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,567 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 950 states and 2988 transitions. Word has length 10 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,568 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,568 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 950 states and 2988 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,568 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,568 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 950 states and 2988 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:56,579 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 14 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,579 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:25:56,579 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:25:56,579 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable1 [2021-10-11 02:25:56,579 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:25:56,586 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:25:56,591 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -90703051, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:25:56,592 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:56,592 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1994091552] [2021-10-11 02:25:56,592 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:25:56,839 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:25:57,317 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:25:57,317 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1994091552] [2021-10-11 02:25:57,318 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:25:57,318 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2021-10-11 02:25:57,318 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [69742665] [2021-10-11 02:25:57,318 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states [2021-10-11 02:25:57,319 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:57,319 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 8 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:25:57,319 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=14, Invalid=42, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2021-10-11 02:25:57,320 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 950 states and 2988 transitions. Second operand 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,091 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,091 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1664 states and 5155 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,092 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,093 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 8 states. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,093 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,105 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1664 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,105 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1098 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,106 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 8 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 8 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.3s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=26, Invalid=64, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,113 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1098 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,149 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1098 to 1098. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,150 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1098 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,158 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1098 states to 1098 states and 3380 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,158 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1098 states and 3380 transitions. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,159 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,159 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1098 states and 3380 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,159 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,159 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1098 states and 3380 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,161 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 14 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,161 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:25:58,162 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:25:58,162 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable2 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,162 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:25:58,163 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:25:58,163 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1318709159, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:25:58,163 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:58,163 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [60816899] [2021-10-11 02:25:58,164 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:25:58,265 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:25:58,511 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,511 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [60816899] [2021-10-11 02:25:58,511 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,512 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,512 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1737272892] [2021-10-11 02:25:58,512 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2021-10-11 02:25:58,512 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:58,513 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:25:58,513 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=11, Invalid=31, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:25:58,514 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1098 states and 3380 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,284 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,284 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1398 states and 4240 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,285 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 9 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,285 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,285 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,296 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1398 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,297 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1256 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,297 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 12 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 9 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.4s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=46, Invalid=110, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,304 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1256 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,336 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1256 to 1192. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,336 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 1192 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,344 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 1192 states to 1192 states and 3686 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,344 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 1192 states and 3686 transitions. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,345 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,345 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 1192 states and 3686 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,345 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,345 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 1192 states and 3686 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,347 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 15 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,347 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:25:59,347 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,348 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable3 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,348 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:25:59,348 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:25:59,348 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1483270023, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:25:59,349 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:59,349 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [277845890] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,349 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:25:59,469 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:25:59,515 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,515 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [277845890] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,516 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,516 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [3] imperfect sequences [] total 3 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,516 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1729413218] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,517 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2021-10-11 02:25:59,517 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:59,518 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,519 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,519 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 1192 states and 3686 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,568 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,568 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1024 states and 2784 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,569 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,569 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,569 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,575 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1024 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,575 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 728 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,576 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 4 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 3 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,580 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 728 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,596 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 728 to 716. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,596 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 716 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,600 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 716 states to 716 states and 1854 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,600 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 716 states and 1854 transitions. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,601 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,601 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 716 states and 1854 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,601 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,601 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 716 states and 1854 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,602 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 17 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,603 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:25:59,603 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,603 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable4 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,603 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:25:59,604 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:25:59,604 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1625820778, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:25:59,604 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:59,604 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [838634546] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,604 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:25:59,709 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:25:59,866 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,867 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [838634546] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,867 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,867 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,867 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1260441424] [2021-10-11 02:25:59,868 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2021-10-11 02:25:59,868 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:25:59,868 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:25:59,869 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=30, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:25:59,869 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 716 states and 1854 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,391 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,391 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 1393 states and 3625 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,392 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,392 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 16 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,392 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,400 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 1393 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,400 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 1146 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,401 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 8 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 4 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=28, Invalid=62, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,406 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 1146 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,440 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 1146 to 722. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,440 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 722 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,444 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 722 states to 722 states and 1863 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,444 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 722 states and 1863 transitions. Word has length 16 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,445 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,445 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 722 states and 1863 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,445 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,445 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 722 states and 1863 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,447 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 17 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,447 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:00,447 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:00,448 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable5 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,448 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:00,448 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:00,448 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1721669734, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:26:00,449 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:00,449 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1364070859] [2021-10-11 02:26:00,449 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:00,558 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:00,642 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,643 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1364070859] [2021-10-11 02:26:00,644 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,644 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,644 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1960748814] [2021-10-11 02:26:00,645 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states [2021-10-11 02:26:00,645 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:00,646 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 5 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,646 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=8, Invalid=12, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,646 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 722 states and 1863 transitions. Second operand 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,707 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,707 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 557 states and 1336 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,708 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,708 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5 states. Word has length 16 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,709 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,712 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 557 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,712 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 436 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,713 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 5 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 4 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 1 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=18, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,715 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 436 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,724 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 436 to 420. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,725 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 420 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,727 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 420 states to 420 states and 983 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,727 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 420 states and 983 transitions. Word has length 16 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,728 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,728 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 420 states and 983 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,728 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,729 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 420 states and 983 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:00,730 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,730 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:00,730 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:00,730 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable6 [2021-10-11 02:26:00,731 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:00,731 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:00,731 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1595270309, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:26:00,731 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:00,732 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [271607931] [2021-10-11 02:26:00,732 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:00,926 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:01,383 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 115.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 55 DAG size of output: 35 [2021-10-11 02:26:01,527 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 118.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 54 DAG size of output: 34 [2021-10-11 02:26:01,732 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:01,732 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [271607931] [2021-10-11 02:26:01,732 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:01,732 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [10] imperfect sequences [] total 10 [2021-10-11 02:26:01,733 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1967515489] [2021-10-11 02:26:01,733 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 12 states [2021-10-11 02:26:01,733 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:01,734 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 12 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:01,734 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=27, Invalid=105, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2021-10-11 02:26:01,734 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 420 states and 983 transitions. Second operand 12 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,759 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,760 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 588 states and 1354 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,761 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,761 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 12 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:02,761 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,765 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 588 [2021-10-11 02:26:02,765 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 504 [2021-10-11 02:26:02,766 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 14 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 14 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 28 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.8s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=54, Invalid=186, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=240 [2021-10-11 02:26:02,768 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 504 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,778 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 504 to 460. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,778 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 460 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,780 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 460 states to 460 states and 1062 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,780 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 460 states and 1062 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:02,780 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,780 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 460 states and 1062 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,781 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 12 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,781 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 460 states and 1062 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:02,782 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:26:02,782 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:02,782 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:02,782 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable7 [2021-10-11 02:26:02,783 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:02,783 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:02,783 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1712782079, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:26:02,783 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:02,784 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1217598650] [2021-10-11 02:26:02,784 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:02,980 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:03,571 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 137.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 55 DAG size of output: 30 [2021-10-11 02:26:03,744 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:03,745 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1217598650] [2021-10-11 02:26:03,745 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:03,745 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [10] imperfect sequences [] total 10 [2021-10-11 02:26:03,745 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [2062379129] [2021-10-11 02:26:03,746 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 12 states [2021-10-11 02:26:03,746 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:03,747 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 12 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:03,747 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=32, Invalid=100, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2021-10-11 02:26:03,747 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 460 states and 1062 transitions. Second operand 12 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,955 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,955 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 794 states and 1803 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,956 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 12 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,956 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 12 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:04,957 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,962 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 794 [2021-10-11 02:26:04,962 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 614 [2021-10-11 02:26:04,963 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 14 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 14 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 16 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.8s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=56, Invalid=184, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=240 [2021-10-11 02:26:04,965 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 614 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,978 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 614 to 470. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,979 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 470 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,980 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 470 states to 470 states and 1088 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,981 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 470 states and 1088 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:04,981 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,981 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 470 states and 1088 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,981 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 12 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,982 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 470 states and 1088 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:04,983 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:26:04,983 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:04,983 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:04,984 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable8 [2021-10-11 02:26:04,984 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 10 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:04,984 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:04,984 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 773067535, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:26:04,985 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:04,985 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1226511604] [2021-10-11 02:26:04,985 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:05,179 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:05,678 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:05,678 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1226511604] [2021-10-11 02:26:05,678 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:05,678 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2021-10-11 02:26:05,679 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [370480618] [2021-10-11 02:26:05,679 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states [2021-10-11 02:26:05,679 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:05,680 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 10 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:05,680 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=24, Invalid=66, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:26:05,680 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 470 states and 1088 transitions. Second operand 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,492 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,492 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 614 states and 1402 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,493 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 11 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,495 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 10 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:06,496 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,499 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 614 [2021-10-11 02:26:06,499 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 278 [2021-10-11 02:26:06,499 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 15 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 13 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 17 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.5s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=62, Invalid=148, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=210 [2021-10-11 02:26:06,501 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 278 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,514 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 278 to 264. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,514 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 264 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,515 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 264 states to 264 states and 590 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,515 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 264 states and 590 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:06,516 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,516 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 264 states and 590 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,516 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,516 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 264 states and 590 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:06,520 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:26:06,520 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:06,520 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:06,520 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable9 [2021-10-11 02:26:06,520 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 11 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:06,521 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:06,521 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1221635767, now seen corresponding path program 3 times [2021-10-11 02:26:06,521 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:06,521 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1877625936] [2021-10-11 02:26:06,521 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:06,665 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:07,051 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,051 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1877625936] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,051 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,052 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,052 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [554084015] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,052 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states [2021-10-11 02:26:07,052 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:07,053 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 10 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,053 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=23, Invalid=67, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,053 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 264 states and 590 transitions. Second operand 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,596 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,596 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 526 states and 1159 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,597 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,597 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 10 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,597 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,599 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 526 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,599 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 364 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,600 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 10 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 10 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 12 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.3s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=41, Invalid=91, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,602 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 364 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,608 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 364 to 250. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,608 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 250 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,609 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 250 states to 250 states and 551 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,609 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 250 states and 551 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,609 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,610 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 250 states and 551 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,610 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,610 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 250 states and 551 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,611 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 21 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,611 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:07,611 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,611 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable10 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,611 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 12 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:07,612 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:07,612 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -150088855, now seen corresponding path program 4 times [2021-10-11 02:26:07,612 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:07,612 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2130039992] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,613 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:07,723 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:07,785 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,785 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2130039992] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,785 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,785 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,786 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [714972980] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,786 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2021-10-11 02:26:07,786 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:07,787 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,787 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=12, Invalid=18, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,787 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 250 states and 551 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,847 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,847 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 214 states and 477 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,848 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,848 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,848 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,850 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 214 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,850 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 198 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,857 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 6 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 2 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=16, Invalid=26, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,859 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 198 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,863 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 198 to 194. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,863 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 194 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,864 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 194 states to 194 states and 439 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,864 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 194 states and 439 transitions. Word has length 20 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,864 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,865 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 194 states and 439 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,865 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,865 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 194 states and 439 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:07,866 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 26 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,866 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:07,866 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,866 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable11 [2021-10-11 02:26:07,866 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 13 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:07,867 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:07,867 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 585542438, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:26:07,867 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:07,867 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1924208020] [2021-10-11 02:26:07,867 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:08,064 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:08,160 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,161 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1924208020] [2021-10-11 02:26:08,161 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,161 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,162 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [745847161] [2021-10-11 02:26:08,162 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states [2021-10-11 02:26:08,163 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:08,163 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 5 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,163 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=7, Invalid=13, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,164 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 194 states and 439 transitions. Second operand 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,220 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,220 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 242 states and 538 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,221 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,221 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 5 states. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,221 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,222 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 242 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,222 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 76 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,223 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 6 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 5 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=17, Invalid=25, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,223 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 76 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,225 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 76 to 76. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,226 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 76 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,226 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 76 states to 76 states and 145 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,226 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 76 states and 145 transitions. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,228 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,228 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 76 states and 145 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,229 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,229 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 76 states and 145 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,232 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 26 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,232 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:08,232 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:08,232 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable12 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,233 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 14 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:08,233 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:08,233 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1183514970, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:26:08,233 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:08,233 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [740315326] [2021-10-11 02:26:08,234 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:08,425 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:08,737 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,737 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [740315326] [2021-10-11 02:26:08,737 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,738 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,738 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [427788816] [2021-10-11 02:26:08,738 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states [2021-10-11 02:26:08,738 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:08,739 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 10 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:08,739 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=24, Invalid=66, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:26:08,739 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 76 states and 145 transitions. Second operand 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,128 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,128 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 138 states and 261 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,129 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,129 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 10 states. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:26:09,129 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,130 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 138 [2021-10-11 02:26:09,130 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 65 [2021-10-11 02:26:09,130 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 12 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 11 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 18 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.3s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=45, Invalid=111, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2021-10-11 02:26:09,131 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 65 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,132 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 65 to 65. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,133 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 65 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,133 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 65 states to 65 states and 117 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,133 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 65 states and 117 transitions. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:26:09,133 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,133 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 65 states and 117 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,133 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,133 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 65 states and 117 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:09,134 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 26 [2021-10-11 02:26:09,134 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:26:09,134 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:26:09,134 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable13 [2021-10-11 02:26:09,134 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 15 === [ULTIMATE.startErr2INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P2Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:26:09,135 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:26:09,135 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -1531082074, now seen corresponding path program 3 times [2021-10-11 02:26:09,135 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:09,135 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1339833771] [2021-10-11 02:26:09,135 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:26:09,311 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:26:10,043 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,043 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1339833771] [2021-10-11 02:26:10,044 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,044 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [11] imperfect sequences [] total 11 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,044 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1935044997] [2021-10-11 02:26:10,044 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 13 states [2021-10-11 02:26:10,044 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:26:10,045 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 13 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,045 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=33, Invalid=123, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=156 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,045 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 65 states and 117 transitions. Second operand 13 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,414 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,414 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 64 states and 116 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,414 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,414 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 13 states. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,414 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,414 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 64 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,415 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 0 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,415 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 16 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 14 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 23 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.6s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=59, Invalid=181, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=240 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,415 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 0 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,416 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 0 to 0. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,416 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 0 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,416 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 0 states to 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,416 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 0 states and 0 transitions. Word has length 25 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,416 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,417 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,417 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 13 states. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,417 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,417 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. No accepting run. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,417 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable14 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,420 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction CFG 11.10 02:26:10 BasicIcfg [2021-10-11 02:26:10,420 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:26:10,421 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Witness Printer---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:26:10,421 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Witness Printer... [2021-10-11 02:26:10,421 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Witness Printer initialized [2021-10-11 02:26:10,422 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGCatcher from plugin Witness Printer for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:25:42" (3/4) ... [2021-10-11 02:26:10,425 INFO L137 WitnessPrinter]: Generating witness for correct program [2021-10-11 02:26:10,431 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,431 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,431 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P2 [2021-10-11 02:26:10,446 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 176 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:26:10,447 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 44 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:26:10,449 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 3 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:26:10,450 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 2 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:26:10,557 INFO L141 WitnessManager]: Wrote witness to /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_ba6b4fef-b498-4d88-8a21-4b7300ed3837/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/witness.graphml [2021-10-11 02:26:10,558 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Witness Printer---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:26:10,558 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Toolchain (without parser) took 34105.82 ms. Allocated memory was 125.8 MB in the beginning and 570.4 MB in the end (delta: 444.6 MB). Free memory was 92.7 MB in the beginning and 390.4 MB in the end (delta: -297.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 145.6 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,559 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CDTParser took 0.24 ms. Allocated memory is still 83.9 MB. Free memory was 40.2 MB in the beginning and 40.1 MB in the end (delta: 70.0 kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,559 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 829.88 ms. Allocated memory is still 125.8 MB. Free memory was 92.3 MB in the beginning and 74.0 MB in the end (delta: 18.3 MB). Peak memory consumption was 18.9 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,560 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Procedure Inliner took 96.12 ms. Allocated memory is still 125.8 MB. Free memory was 74.0 MB in the beginning and 70.3 MB in the end (delta: 3.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,560 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Preprocessor took 104.30 ms. Allocated memory is still 125.8 MB. Free memory was 70.3 MB in the beginning and 66.8 MB in the end (delta: 3.5 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,560 INFO L168 Benchmark]: RCFGBuilder took 5242.29 ms. Allocated memory was 125.8 MB in the beginning and 199.2 MB in the end (delta: 73.4 MB). Free memory was 66.6 MB in the beginning and 129.0 MB in the end (delta: -62.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 78.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,561 INFO L168 Benchmark]: TraceAbstraction took 27683.56 ms. Allocated memory was 199.2 MB in the beginning and 570.4 MB in the end (delta: 371.2 MB). Free memory was 129.0 MB in the beginning and 405.1 MB in the end (delta: -276.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 95.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,561 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Witness Printer took 136.70 ms. Allocated memory is still 570.4 MB. Free memory was 405.1 MB in the beginning and 390.4 MB in the end (delta: 14.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:26:10,564 INFO L339 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### End [Toolchain 1] ####################### --- Results --- * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.core: - StatisticsResult: Toolchain Benchmarks Benchmark results are: * CDTParser took 0.24 ms. Allocated memory is still 83.9 MB. Free memory was 40.2 MB in the beginning and 40.1 MB in the end (delta: 70.0 kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 829.88 ms. Allocated memory is still 125.8 MB. Free memory was 92.3 MB in the beginning and 74.0 MB in the end (delta: 18.3 MB). Peak memory consumption was 18.9 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Procedure Inliner took 96.12 ms. Allocated memory is still 125.8 MB. Free memory was 74.0 MB in the beginning and 70.3 MB in the end (delta: 3.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Preprocessor took 104.30 ms. Allocated memory is still 125.8 MB. Free memory was 70.3 MB in the beginning and 66.8 MB in the end (delta: 3.5 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * RCFGBuilder took 5242.29 ms. Allocated memory was 125.8 MB in the beginning and 199.2 MB in the end (delta: 73.4 MB). Free memory was 66.6 MB in the beginning and 129.0 MB in the end (delta: -62.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 78.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * TraceAbstraction took 27683.56 ms. Allocated memory was 199.2 MB in the beginning and 570.4 MB in the end (delta: 371.2 MB). Free memory was 129.0 MB in the beginning and 405.1 MB in the end (delta: -276.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 95.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Witness Printer took 136.70 ms. Allocated memory is still 570.4 MB. Free memory was 405.1 MB in the beginning and 390.4 MB in the end (delta: 14.7 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: - StatisticsResult: PetriNetLargeBlockEncoding benchmarks 1123 VarBasedMoverChecksPositive, 68 VarBasedMoverChecksNegative, 11 SemBasedMoverChecksPositive, 57 SemBasedMoverChecksNegative, 0 SemBasedMoverChecksUnknown, SemBasedMoverCheckTime: 5.2s, 92 CheckedPairsTotal, LiptonReductionStatistics: ReductionTime: 12.1s, 110 PlacesBefore, 40 PlacesAfterwards, 102 TransitionsBefore, 31 TransitionsAfterwards, 1958 CoEnabledTransitionPairs, 6 FixpointIterations, 37 TrivialSequentialCompositions, 40 ConcurrentSequentialCompositions, 0 TrivialYvCompositions, 7 ConcurrentYvCompositions, 1 ChoiceCompositions, 85 TotalNumberOfCompositions, 6536 MoverChecksTotal - PositiveResult [Line: 18]: call to reach_error is unreachable For all program executions holds that call to reach_error is unreachable at this location - PositiveResult [Line: 18]: call to reach_error is unreachable For all program executions holds that call to reach_error is unreachable at this location - AllSpecificationsHoldResult: All specifications hold 2 specifications checked. All of them hold - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data CFG has 4 procedures, 101 locations, 2 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. VerificationResult: SAFE, OverallTime: 27.4s, OverallIterations: 15, TraceHistogramMax: 1, AutomataDifference: 7.0s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 12.2s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: 492 SDtfs, 653 SDslu, 1703 SDs, 0 SdLazy, 1913 SolverSat, 398 SolverUnsat, 0 SolverUnknown, 0 SolverNotchecked, 4.2s Time, PredicateUnifierStatistics: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 135 GetRequests, 10 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 124 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 132 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 4.6s Time, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=1598occurred in iteration=0, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: 0.4s AutomataMinimizationTime, 15 MinimizatonAttempts, 836 StatesRemovedByMinimization, 9 NontrivialMinimizations, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.1s SsaConstructionTime, 2.2s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 4.8s InterpolantComputationTime, 264 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 264 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 15 NumberOfCheckSat, 249 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 58585 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 15 InterpolantComputations, 15 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available RESULT: Ultimate proved your program to be correct! Received shutdown request...