./Ultimate.py --spec ../../sv-benchmarks/c/properties/unreach-call.prp --file ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/rfi002_pso.oepc.i --full-output --architecture 32bit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checking for ERROR reachability Using default analysis Version 7b2dab56 Calling Ultimate with: /usr/bin/java -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/config -Xmx15G -Xms4m -jar /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.5.800.v20200727-1323.jar -data @noDefault -ultimatedata /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data -tc /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/TaipanReach.xml -i ../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/rfi002_pso.oepc.i -s /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf --cacsl2boogietranslator.entry.function main --witnessprinter.witness.directory /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI --witnessprinter.witness.filename witness.graphml --witnessprinter.write.witness.besides.input.file false --witnessprinter.graph.data.specification CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) --witnessprinter.graph.data.producer Taipan --witnessprinter.graph.data.architecture 32bit --witnessprinter.graph.data.programhash 46409b3cda3bb692b91f18ec20cd31dd601f1e4b ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Execution finished normally Writing output log to file Ultimate.log Result: TRUE --- Real Ultimate output --- This is Ultimate 0.2.0-7b2dab5 [2021-10-11 02:22:22,204 INFO L177 SettingsManager]: Resetting all preferences to default values... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,206 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting UltimateCore preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,237 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Ultimate Commandline Interface provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,237 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Preprocessor preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,239 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Procedure Inliner preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,241 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Abstract Interpretation preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,243 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LassoRanker preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,246 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Reaching Definitions preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,247 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SyntaxChecker preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,248 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Sifa preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,250 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Büchi Program Product provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,251 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting LTL2Aut preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,252 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting PEA to Boogie preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,254 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BlockEncodingV2 preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,255 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcToBoogie preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,257 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting AutomataScriptInterpreter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,258 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting BuchiAutomizer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,260 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CACSL2BoogieTranslator preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,263 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CodeCheck preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,265 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting InvariantSynthesis preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,267 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting RCFGBuilder preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,268 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Referee preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,269 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TraceAbstraction preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,273 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionConcurrent provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,273 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: TraceAbstractionWithAFAs provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,274 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting TreeAutomizer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,275 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgToChc preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,276 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting IcfgTransformer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,277 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqToTest provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,278 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Boogie Printer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,279 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ChcSmtPrinter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,280 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting ReqPrinter preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,281 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Printer preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,283 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: Boogie PL CUP Parser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,283 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting CDTParser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,284 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: AutomataScriptParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,285 INFO L184 SettingsManager]: ReqParser provides no preferences, ignoring... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,285 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting SmtParser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,286 INFO L181 SettingsManager]: Resetting Witness Parser preferences to default values [2021-10-11 02:22:22,287 INFO L188 SettingsManager]: Finished resetting all preferences to default values... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,288 INFO L101 SettingsManager]: Beginning loading settings from /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/config/svcomp-Reach-32bit-Taipan_Default.epf [2021-10-11 02:22:22,324 INFO L113 SettingsManager]: Loading preferences was successful [2021-10-11 02:22:22,324 INFO L115 SettingsManager]: Preferences different from defaults after loading the file: [2021-10-11 02:22:22,325 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Boogie Procedure Inliner differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:22:22,326 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * User list type=DISABLED [2021-10-11 02:22:22,326 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Abstract Interpretation differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:22:22,326 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Explicit value domain=true [2021-10-11 02:22:22,326 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain for RCFG-of-the-future=PoormanAbstractDomain [2021-10-11 02:22:22,327 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Octagon Domain=false [2021-10-11 02:22:22,327 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract domain=CompoundDomain [2021-10-11 02:22:22,327 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check feasibility of abstract posts with an SMT solver=true [2021-10-11 02:22:22,328 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use the RCFG-of-the-future interface=true [2021-10-11 02:22:22,328 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Interval Domain=false [2021-10-11 02:22:22,328 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of Sifa differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:22:22,328 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Call Summarizer=TopInputCallSummarizer [2021-10-11 02:22:22,329 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Simplification Technique=SIMPLIFY_QUICK [2021-10-11 02:22:22,329 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of CACSL2BoogieTranslator differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:22:22,330 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long=4 [2021-10-11 02:22:22,330 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Overapproximate operations on floating types=true [2021-10-11 02:22:22,330 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof POINTER=4 [2021-10-11 02:22:22,331 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check division by zero=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:22:22,331 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer to allocated memory at dereference=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:22:22,331 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * If two pointers are subtracted or compared they have the same base address=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:22:22,331 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check array bounds for arrays that are off heap=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:22:22,332 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Adapt memory model on pointer casts if necessary=true [2021-10-11 02:22:22,332 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * sizeof long double=12 [2021-10-11 02:22:22,332 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Check if freed pointer was valid=false [2021-10-11 02:22:22,332 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Use constant arrays=true [2021-10-11 02:22:22,333 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Pointer base address is valid at dereference=IGNORE [2021-10-11 02:22:22,333 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of RCFGBuilder differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:22:22,333 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_DefaultMode [2021-10-11 02:22:22,333 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2021-10-11 02:22:22,334 INFO L136 SettingsManager]: Preferences of TraceAbstraction differ from their defaults: [2021-10-11 02:22:22,334 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Interpolants along a Counterexample=FPandBP [2021-10-11 02:22:22,334 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Positions where we compute the Hoare Annotation=LoopsAndPotentialCycles [2021-10-11 02:22:22,334 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement strategy=SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:22,335 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Command for external solver=z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in [2021-10-11 02:22:22,335 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Compute Hoare Annotation of negated interpolant automaton, abstraction and CFG=true [2021-10-11 02:22:22,335 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Trace refinement exception blacklist=NONE [2021-10-11 02:22:22,335 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * SMT solver=External_ModelsAndUnsatCoreMode [2021-10-11 02:22:22,336 INFO L138 SettingsManager]: * Abstract interpretation Mode=USE_PREDICATES WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 (file:/tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/plugins/com.sun.xml.bind_2.2.0.v201505121915.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int) WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.opt.Injector$1 WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator: Entry function -> main Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness directory -> /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Witness filename -> witness.graphml Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Write witness besides input file -> false Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data specification -> CHECK( init(main()), LTL(G ! call(reach_error())) ) Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data producer -> Taipan Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data architecture -> 32bit Applying setting for plugin de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.witnessprinter: Graph data programhash -> 46409b3cda3bb692b91f18ec20cd31dd601f1e4b [2021-10-11 02:22:22,659 INFO L75 nceAwareModelManager]: Repository-Root is: /tmp [2021-10-11 02:22:22,709 INFO L261 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Applicable parser(s) successfully (re)initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:22,712 INFO L217 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Toolchain selected. [2021-10-11 02:22:22,714 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CDTParser... [2021-10-11 02:22:22,715 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CDTParser initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:22,716 INFO L432 ainManager$Toolchain]: [Toolchain 1]: Parsing single file: /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/../../sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/rfi002_pso.oepc.i [2021-10-11 02:22:22,831 INFO L220 CDTParser]: Created temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/52ba2366c/19705b942590473eac4f20d53e3eb981/FLAG613861ea0 [2021-10-11 02:22:23,503 INFO L306 CDTParser]: Found 1 translation units. [2021-10-11 02:22:23,503 INFO L160 CDTParser]: Scanning /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/rfi002_pso.oepc.i [2021-10-11 02:22:23,524 INFO L349 CDTParser]: About to delete temporary CDT project at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/52ba2366c/19705b942590473eac4f20d53e3eb981/FLAG613861ea0 [2021-10-11 02:22:23,764 INFO L357 CDTParser]: Successfully deleted /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/data/52ba2366c/19705b942590473eac4f20d53e3eb981 [2021-10-11 02:22:23,768 INFO L299 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### [Toolchain 1] ####################### [2021-10-11 02:22:23,770 INFO L131 ToolchainWalker]: Walking toolchain with 6 elements. [2021-10-11 02:22:23,772 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:23,772 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing CACSL2BoogieTranslator... [2021-10-11 02:22:23,776 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:23,778 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ACSLObjectContainerObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:22:23" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:23,780 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from CACSL2BoogieTranslator for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator.ACSLObjectContainerObserver@8ab9aca and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:23, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:22:23,781 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer CACSL2BoogieTranslatorObserver from plugin CACSL2BoogieTranslator for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:22:23" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:23,790 INFO L145 MainTranslator]: Starting translation in SV-COMP mode [2021-10-11 02:22:23,860 INFO L178 MainTranslator]: Built tables and reachable declarations [2021-10-11 02:22:24,102 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/rfi002_pso.oepc.i[992,1005] [2021-10-11 02:22:24,351 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2021-10-11 02:22:24,361 INFO L203 MainTranslator]: Completed pre-run [2021-10-11 02:22:24,377 WARN L226 ndardFunctionHandler]: Function reach_error is already implemented but we override the implementation for the call at /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/sv-benchmarks/c/pthread-wmm/rfi002_pso.oepc.i[992,1005] [2021-10-11 02:22:24,495 INFO L206 PostProcessor]: Analyzing one entry point: main [2021-10-11 02:22:24,585 INFO L208 MainTranslator]: Completed translation [2021-10-11 02:22:24,586 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24 WrapperNode [2021-10-11 02:22:24,586 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END CACSL2BoogieTranslator---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:24,587 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:24,588 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Procedure Inliner... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,588 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Procedure Inliner initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:24,598 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,623 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer Inliner from plugin Boogie Procedure Inliner for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,681 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Procedure Inliner---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:24,682 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:24,682 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Boogie Preprocessor... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,682 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Boogie Preprocessor initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:24,693 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer EnsureBoogieModelObserver from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,694 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TypeChecker from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,700 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer ConstExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,701 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer StructExpander from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,726 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer UnstructureCode from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,733 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer FunctionInliner from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,737 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer BoogieSymbolTableConstructor from plugin Boogie Preprocessor for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,744 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Boogie Preprocessor---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:24,745 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:24,745 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing RCFGBuilder... [2021-10-11 02:22:24,745 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: RCFGBuilder initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:24,746 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGBuilderObserver from plugin RCFGBuilder for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (1/1) ... No working directory specified, using /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/z3 Starting monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 (exit command is (exit), workingDir is null) Waiting until toolchain timeout for monitored process 1 with z3 SMTLIB2_COMPLIANT=true -memory:2024 -smt2 -in -t:2000 [2021-10-11 02:22:24,879 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~int [2021-10-11 02:22:24,879 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_begin [2021-10-11 02:22:24,879 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure #Ultimate.allocOnStack [2021-10-11 02:22:24,880 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.dealloc [2021-10-11 02:22:24,880 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:22:24,880 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:22:24,882 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:22:24,883 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:22:24,883 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure write~init~int [2021-10-11 02:22:24,883 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure __VERIFIER_atomic_end [2021-10-11 02:22:24,884 INFO L130 BoogieDeclarations]: Found specification of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2021-10-11 02:22:24,884 INFO L138 BoogieDeclarations]: Found implementation of procedure ULTIMATE.start [2021-10-11 02:22:24,886 WARN L209 CfgBuilder]: User set CodeBlockSize to LoopFreeBlock but program contains fork statements. Overwriting the user preferences and setting CodeBlockSize to SingleStatement [2021-10-11 02:22:29,145 INFO L294 CfgBuilder]: Using the 1 location(s) as analysis (start of procedure ULTIMATE.start) [2021-10-11 02:22:29,145 INFO L299 CfgBuilder]: Removed 10 assume(true) statements. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,149 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:22:29 BoogieIcfgContainer [2021-10-11 02:22:29,149 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END RCFGBuilder---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:29,151 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:29,152 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing TraceAbstraction... [2021-10-11 02:22:29,155 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: TraceAbstraction initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:29,156 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "CDTParser AST 11.10 02:22:23" (1/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:29,158 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@1719e97a and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 11.10 02:22:29, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:22:29,158 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.cacsl2boogietranslator AST 11.10 02:22:24" (2/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:29,158 INFO L205 PluginConnector]: Invalid model from TraceAbstraction for observer de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction.TraceAbstractionObserver@1719e97a and model type de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction AST 11.10 02:22:29, skipping insertion in model container [2021-10-11 02:22:29,159 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer TraceAbstractionObserver from plugin TraceAbstraction for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:22:29" (3/3) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:29,160 INFO L111 eAbstractionObserver]: Analyzing ICFG rfi002_pso.oepc.i [2021-10-11 02:22:29,180 WARN L169 ceAbstractionStarter]: Switching off computation of Hoare annotation because input is a concurrent program [2021-10-11 02:22:29,180 INFO L180 ceAbstractionStarter]: Automizer settings: Hoare:false NWA Interpolation:FPandBP Determinization: PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2021-10-11 02:22:29,184 INFO L192 ceAbstractionStarter]: Appying trace abstraction to program that has 2 error locations. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,185 INFO L354 ceAbstractionStarter]: Constructing petrified ICFG for 1 thread instances. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,245 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,245 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,245 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,245 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,246 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,246 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,246 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,246 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,247 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,247 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,247 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,247 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,247 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,248 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,248 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,248 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,249 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,250 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,250 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,250 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,250 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,250 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,251 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,252 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,252 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,253 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,254 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,255 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,256 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,257 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,258 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,258 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,258 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,258 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,259 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,259 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,259 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,259 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,259 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,260 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,260 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,260 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,260 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,262 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,263 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,263 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,263 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,263 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,263 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,264 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,265 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,265 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,265 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,265 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,266 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,266 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,266 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,266 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,266 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,267 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,268 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,270 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,270 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,271 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,273 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,274 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,280 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,282 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,282 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,283 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,284 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,285 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,285 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,289 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,290 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,290 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,290 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,290 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,291 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,291 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,291 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,292 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,292 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,292 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,292 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,292 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,293 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,293 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#in~arg.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,293 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,293 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,293 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,293 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,294 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,294 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,294 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,294 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,294 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,294 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,295 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,296 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,297 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,298 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,299 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,299 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,299 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,299 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,299 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,299 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,300 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,302 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,303 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,305 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,305 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,306 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,307 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,308 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,309 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,310 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,312 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,313 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,318 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,318 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,318 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,318 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,318 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,319 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,320 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,322 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,325 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite34| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,325 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite35| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,325 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite10| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,325 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite36| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,325 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite37| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,326 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,326 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite38| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,326 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite39| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,326 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,334 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet12| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,334 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~nondet11| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,334 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,334 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite19| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,335 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite18| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,335 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite17| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,335 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite16| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,335 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite15| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,335 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite30| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,335 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite14| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,335 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite31| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,336 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite13| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,336 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P0Thread1of1ForFork0_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,336 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite32| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,336 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite33| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,336 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite22| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,337 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite21| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,337 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite25| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,337 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite20| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,337 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite26| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,337 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite27| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,337 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite28| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,337 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite29| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,338 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite5| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,338 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite6| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,338 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite9| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,338 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite7| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,338 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite8| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,338 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite24| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,338 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P0Thread1of1ForFork0_#t~ite23| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,341 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite46| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,341 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite45| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,341 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite44| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,341 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite43| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,341 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite65| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,341 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite66| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,341 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite49| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,342 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite67| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,342 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite48| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,342 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite47| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,342 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite68| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,342 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_~expression not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,342 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite61| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,342 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite62| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,343 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite63| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,343 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite64| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,343 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite42| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,343 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite60| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,343 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.offset| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,343 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.base not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,343 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1___VERIFIER_assert_#in~expression| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,344 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite57| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,344 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite56| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,344 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite55| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,344 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite54| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,344 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite59| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,344 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite58| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,344 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe P1Thread1of1ForFork1_~arg.offset not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,345 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite53| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,345 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite52| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,345 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite51| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,345 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~ite50| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,345 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet40| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,345 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#res.base| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,345 WARN L313 ript$VariableManager]: TermVariabe |P1Thread1of1ForFork1_#t~nondet41| not constructed by VariableManager. Cannot ensure absence of name clashes. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,347 INFO L149 ThreadInstanceAdder]: Constructed 0 joinOtherThreadTransitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,358 INFO L253 AbstractCegarLoop]: Starting to check reachability of 5 error locations. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,389 INFO L377 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interprodecural is true [2021-10-11 02:22:29,390 INFO L378 AbstractCegarLoop]: Hoare is true [2021-10-11 02:22:29,390 INFO L379 AbstractCegarLoop]: Compute interpolants for FPandBP [2021-10-11 02:22:29,390 INFO L380 AbstractCegarLoop]: Backedges is STRAIGHT_LINE [2021-10-11 02:22:29,390 INFO L381 AbstractCegarLoop]: Determinization is PREDICATE_ABSTRACTION [2021-10-11 02:22:29,390 INFO L382 AbstractCegarLoop]: Difference is false [2021-10-11 02:22:29,390 INFO L383 AbstractCegarLoop]: Minimize is MINIMIZE_SEVPA [2021-10-11 02:22:29,390 INFO L387 AbstractCegarLoop]: ======== Iteration 0==of CEGAR loop == AllErrorsAtOnce======== [2021-10-11 02:22:29,406 INFO L120 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Petri net LBE is using semantic-based independence relation. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,408 INFO L135 etLargeBlockEncoding]: Starting large block encoding on Petri net that has 90 places, 85 transitions, 180 flow [2021-10-11 02:22:29,411 INFO L110 LiptonReduction]: Starting Lipton reduction on Petri net that has 90 places, 85 transitions, 180 flow [2021-10-11 02:22:29,413 INFO L74 FinitePrefix]: Start finitePrefix. Operand has 90 places, 85 transitions, 180 flow [2021-10-11 02:22:29,478 INFO L129 PetriNetUnfolder]: 2/83 cut-off events. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,478 INFO L130 PetriNetUnfolder]: For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,482 INFO L84 FinitePrefix]: Finished finitePrefix Result has 90 conditions, 83 events. 2/83 cut-off events. For 0/0 co-relation queries the response was YES. Maximal size of possible extension queue 4. Compared 58 event pairs, 0 based on Foata normal form. 0/79 useless extension candidates. Maximal degree in co-relation 49. Up to 2 conditions per place. [2021-10-11 02:22:29,485 INFO L116 LiptonReduction]: Number of co-enabled transitions 1124 [2021-10-11 02:22:29,973 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:29,974 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:29,982 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:29,983 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:29,990 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:29,990 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:29,998 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:29,999 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,007 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,008 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,011 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,011 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,018 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,018 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,054 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,054 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,058 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,058 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,170 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,170 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,175 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,176 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,182 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,182 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:30,189 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:30,189 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:31,632 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 1.40 s on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 228 DAG size of output: 188 [2021-10-11 02:22:32,230 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 594.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 186 [2021-10-11 02:22:34,617 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 2.38 s on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 312 DAG size of output: 267 [2021-10-11 02:22:35,528 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 907.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 264 [2021-10-11 02:22:35,876 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,876 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:35,877 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,878 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:35,884 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,885 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:35,888 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,889 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:35,924 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,925 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:35,926 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,926 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:35,930 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,931 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:35,934 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:35,935 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,034 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,035 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,039 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,039 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,148 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,148 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,169 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,170 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,171 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,172 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,177 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,177 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,182 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,182 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,186 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,186 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,188 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,189 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,352 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,353 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,358 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,358 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,360 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,361 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,365 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,365 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,368 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,369 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,370 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,371 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,373 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,374 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,439 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,440 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,443 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,444 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,481 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,481 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,482 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,483 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,484 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,485 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,487 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,488 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,513 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,513 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,514 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,514 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,516 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,517 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,522 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:36,522 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:36,964 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 109.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 53 DAG size of output: 51 [2021-10-11 02:22:37,061 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,062 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,065 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,066 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,067 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,068 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,069 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,070 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,073 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,074 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,077 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,077 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,079 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,080 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,156 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,156 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,160 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,160 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,202 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,203 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,204 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,204 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,206 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,207 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,209 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,210 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,232 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,233 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,234 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,234 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,236 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,237 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,239 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,240 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,567 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,567 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,597 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,597 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,598 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,598 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,623 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,624 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,624 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,625 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,680 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,681 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,683 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,684 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,747 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,747 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,755 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,755 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,757 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,757 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,758 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,759 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,760 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,761 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,762 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,763 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,764 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,764 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,878 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,878 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,880 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,880 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,881 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,881 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,883 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,884 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,900 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,900 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,902 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,902 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,903 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,903 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,908 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,909 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,911 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,911 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,913 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,913 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,917 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,917 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,921 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,921 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:37,925 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:37,925 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,051 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,052 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,053 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,053 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,054 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,054 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,056 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,056 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,062 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,063 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,064 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,064 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,067 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,067 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,070 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,070 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,073 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,073 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,075 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,075 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,078 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,078 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,080 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,080 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,082 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,082 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,438 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,439 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,440 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,440 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,443 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,443 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,446 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,447 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,486 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,487 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,491 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,492 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,493 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,493 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,496 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,496 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,498 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,498 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,500 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,501 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,502 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,502 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,503 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,504 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,564 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,564 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,565 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,566 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,589 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,590 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,590 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,591 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,653 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,653 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,656 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,657 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,705 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,706 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,714 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,714 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,716 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,717 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,718 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,718 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,720 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,720 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,721 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,722 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:38,724 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:38,724 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,094 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 279.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 85 DAG size of output: 60 [2021-10-11 02:22:39,663 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 476.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 109 DAG size of output: 83 [2021-10-11 02:22:39,853 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 189.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 81 [2021-10-11 02:22:39,932 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,932 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,933 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,933 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,934 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,934 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,935 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,935 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,986 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,987 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,988 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,988 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,990 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,990 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,991 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,991 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,992 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,992 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,996 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,996 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:39,999 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:39,999 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,001 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,001 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,004 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,005 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,007 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,007 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,010 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,011 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,157 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,158 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,159 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,159 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,160 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,160 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,161 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,161 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,162 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,163 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,169 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,170 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,172 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,172 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,173 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,174 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,176 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,177 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,178 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,178 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,180 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,180 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 6 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,185 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,185 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,187 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,187 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,190 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 6, 3, 6, 3, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,190 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,260 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,261 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,271 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,272 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,273 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,273 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,275 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,275 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,278 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,278 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,280 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,280 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,281 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,282 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,333 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,334 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,336 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,336 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,481 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,481 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,491 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,492 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,493 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,493 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,494 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,494 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,496 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,497 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,499 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,499 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,500 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,500 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,552 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,552 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,555 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,555 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,866 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,867 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,876 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,876 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,877 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,877 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,880 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,880 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,882 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,882 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,884 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,884 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,886 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,887 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,888 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,888 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,974 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,975 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,976 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,976 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,978 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,979 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:40,982 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:40,982 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:41,422 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 410.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 186 [2021-10-11 02:22:41,867 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 443.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 186 [2021-10-11 02:22:42,711 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 842.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 264 [2021-10-11 02:22:43,607 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 877.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 264 [2021-10-11 02:22:43,764 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,764 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,765 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,765 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,767 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,767 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,769 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,769 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,787 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,788 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,788 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,789 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,790 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,790 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,792 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,792 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,864 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,864 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,865 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,865 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,867 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,867 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,869 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,869 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,888 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,888 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,889 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,889 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,890 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,891 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:43,892 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:43,893 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,029 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,029 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,032 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,032 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,078 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,078 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,082 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,082 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,083 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,084 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,085 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,089 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 5 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,091 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,091 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,093 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,093 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,094 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,095 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,143 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,144 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,263 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,263 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,264 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,264 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,267 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,268 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,269 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,270 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,292 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,293 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,293 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,294 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,295 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,296 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,298 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,298 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,593 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,593 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,594 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,594 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,622 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,623 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,623 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,624 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,659 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,660 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,661 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,661 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,664 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,664 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,666 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,667 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,689 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,690 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,690 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,691 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,692 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,693 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,694 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,695 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 4 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,745 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,746 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,746 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,747 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,749 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[7, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,749 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 7 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,752 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 8, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,752 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,795 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,795 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 2 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,800 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,800 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,801 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,802 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,804 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,804 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,805 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,805 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,808 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,808 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,810 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,810 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,811 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 3, 3, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,811 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,922 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,923 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,924 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,924 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,951 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,952 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:44,953 INFO L398 QuantifierPusher]: Applying distributivity to a CONJUNCTION[3, 2, 5, 4, 1] term [2021-10-11 02:22:44,953 INFO L639 QuantifierPusher]: Distributing 2 conjuncts over 3 disjuncts [2021-10-11 02:22:45,713 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 123.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 98 [2021-10-11 02:22:45,826 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 111.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 94 [2021-10-11 02:22:45,981 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 154.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 98 [2021-10-11 02:22:46,111 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 129.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 94 [2021-10-11 02:22:46,532 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 417.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 114 DAG size of output: 110 [2021-10-11 02:22:46,718 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 185.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 106 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,173 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 453.00 ms on a formula simplification. DAG size of input: 114 DAG size of output: 110 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,354 WARN L197 SmtUtils]: Spent 180.00 ms on a formula simplification that was a NOOP. DAG size: 106 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,359 INFO L131 LiptonReduction]: Checked pairs total: 3210 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,359 INFO L133 LiptonReduction]: Total number of compositions: 75 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,378 INFO L100 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Start petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Operand has 29 places, 23 transitions, 56 flow [2021-10-11 02:22:47,397 INFO L122 iNet2FiniteAutomaton]: Finished petriNet2FiniteAutomaton. Result 266 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,399 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 266 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,403 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 6 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,403 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:47,404 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:47,404 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 1 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:47,409 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:47,410 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1600914985, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:22:47,420 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:47,420 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2029654018] [2021-10-11 02:22:47,420 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:47,559 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:47,655 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,656 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2029654018] [2021-10-11 02:22:47,657 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,657 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [1] imperfect sequences [] total 1 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,658 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1654558009] [2021-10-11 02:22:47,662 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states [2021-10-11 02:22:47,662 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:47,678 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 3 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,679 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,681 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 266 states. Second operand 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,802 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,802 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 230 states and 564 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,807 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,809 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 3 states. Word has length 5 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,809 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,827 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 230 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,828 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 194 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,829 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 1 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 1 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=3, Invalid=3, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=6 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,850 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 194 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,904 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 194 to 194. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,906 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 194 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,916 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 194 states to 194 states and 468 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,920 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 194 states and 468 transitions. Word has length 5 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,921 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,921 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 194 states and 468 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,921 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 3 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,921 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 194 states and 468 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:47,922 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 9 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,922 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:47,923 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:47,923 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable0 [2021-10-11 02:22:47,923 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 2 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:47,926 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:47,927 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1544120838, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:22:47,927 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:47,928 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1049138567] [2021-10-11 02:22:47,928 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:48,065 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:48,146 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,147 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1049138567] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,147 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,147 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,148 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [81636089] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,149 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2021-10-11 02:22:48,149 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:48,150 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,151 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,151 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 194 states and 468 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,209 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,210 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 194 states and 444 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,210 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,211 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 8 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,212 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,215 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 194 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,216 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 158 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,217 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 3 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,218 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 158 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,235 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 158 to 158. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,237 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 158 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,238 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 158 states to 158 states and 366 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,238 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 158 states and 366 transitions. Word has length 8 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,238 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,239 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 158 states and 366 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,239 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,239 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 158 states and 366 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,241 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 12 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,242 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:48,242 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,242 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable1 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,242 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 3 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:48,254 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:48,255 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -75177463, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:22:48,255 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:48,255 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [230771150] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,256 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:48,443 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:48,566 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,567 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [230771150] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,567 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,568 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [2] imperfect sequences [] total 2 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,568 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [85850131] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,568 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states [2021-10-11 02:22:48,569 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:48,569 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 4 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,570 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=5, Invalid=7, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=12 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,570 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 158 states and 366 transitions. Second operand 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,609 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,609 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 164 states and 367 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,610 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 5 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,610 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 4 states. Word has length 11 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,610 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,612 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 164 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,612 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 146 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,613 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 3 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 3 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 0 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=11, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=20 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,614 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 146 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,633 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 146 to 146. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,634 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 146 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,635 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 146 states to 146 states and 334 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,635 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 146 states and 334 transitions. Word has length 11 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,635 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,636 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 146 states and 334 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,636 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 4 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,636 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 146 states and 334 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:48,642 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 14 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,643 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:48,644 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,644 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable2 [2021-10-11 02:22:48,644 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 4 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:48,645 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:48,645 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -249359735, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:22:48,646 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:48,646 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2060341680] [2021-10-11 02:22:48,646 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:48,777 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:49,084 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,085 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [2060341680] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,085 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,085 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [7] imperfect sequences [] total 7 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,086 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1432208464] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,086 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 9 states [2021-10-11 02:22:49,086 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:49,087 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 9 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,087 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=20, Invalid=52, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,087 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 146 states and 334 transitions. Second operand 9 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,425 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,425 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 184 states and 415 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,426 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,426 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 9 states. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,426 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,429 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 184 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,429 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 170 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,430 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 10 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 10 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 15 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.2s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=41, Invalid=91, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=132 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,430 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 170 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,436 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 170 to 164. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,436 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 164 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,437 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 164 states to 164 states and 376 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,437 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 164 states and 376 transitions. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,438 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,438 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 164 states and 376 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,438 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 9 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,438 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 164 states and 376 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,439 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 14 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,439 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:49,439 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,440 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable3 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,440 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 5 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:49,440 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:49,440 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 1012363259, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:22:49,440 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:49,441 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [673351339] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,441 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:49,498 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:49,651 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,651 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [673351339] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,651 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,651 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [6] imperfect sequences [] total 6 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,652 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1521173223] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,652 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states [2021-10-11 02:22:49,652 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:49,652 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 8 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,652 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=17, Invalid=39, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=56 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,653 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 164 states and 376 transitions. Second operand 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,889 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,890 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 188 states and 426 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,890 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,891 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 8 states. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,891 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,892 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 188 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,893 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 176 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,893 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 10 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 9 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 15 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=33, Invalid=77, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,894 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 176 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,898 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 176 to 170. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,898 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 170 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,899 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 170 states to 170 states and 392 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,899 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 170 states and 392 transitions. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,900 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,900 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 170 states and 392 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,900 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,900 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 170 states and 392 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:49,901 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 14 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,901 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:49,901 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,901 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable4 [2021-10-11 02:22:49,901 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 6 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:49,902 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:49,902 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 387053223, now seen corresponding path program 3 times [2021-10-11 02:22:49,902 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:49,902 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1936966565] [2021-10-11 02:22:49,903 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:49,975 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:50,123 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,124 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1936966565] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,124 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,124 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,124 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [900916675] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,125 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2021-10-11 02:22:50,125 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:50,126 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,127 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=13, Invalid=29, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,127 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 170 states and 392 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,284 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,284 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 212 states and 471 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,285 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,285 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,285 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,288 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 212 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,288 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 155 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,288 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 1 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 8 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 7 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=34, Invalid=56, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,289 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 155 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,292 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 155 to 131. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,292 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 131 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,293 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 131 states to 131 states and 291 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,293 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 131 states and 291 transitions. Word has length 13 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,293 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,294 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 131 states and 291 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,294 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,294 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 131 states and 291 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,294 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 15 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,294 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:50,295 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,295 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable5 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,295 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 7 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:50,295 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:50,296 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 859722214, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:22:50,296 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:50,296 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [251777994] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,296 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:50,362 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:50,479 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,479 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [251777994] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,480 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,480 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [4] imperfect sequences [] total 4 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,480 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [1349470491] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,480 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states [2021-10-11 02:22:50,480 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:50,481 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 6 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,481 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=9, Invalid=21, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=30 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,481 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 131 states and 291 transitions. Second operand 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,726 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,726 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 149 states and 321 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,727 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 8 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,727 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 6 states. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,727 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,728 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 149 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,728 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 138 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,729 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 8 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 5 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.1s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=28, Invalid=62, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,729 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 138 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,733 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 138 to 129. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,733 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 129 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,734 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 129 states to 129 states and 285 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,734 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 129 states and 285 transitions. Word has length 14 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,735 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,735 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 129 states and 285 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,735 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,735 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 129 states and 285 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:50,736 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 16 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,736 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:50,736 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,736 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable6 [2021-10-11 02:22:50,736 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 8 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:50,737 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:50,737 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash 881525226, now seen corresponding path program 1 times [2021-10-11 02:22:50,737 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:50,737 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1305985496] [2021-10-11 02:22:50,737 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:50,854 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:51,014 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,014 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [1305985496] [2021-10-11 02:22:51,014 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,015 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [5] imperfect sequences [] total 5 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,015 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [966037876] [2021-10-11 02:22:51,016 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states [2021-10-11 02:22:51,016 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:51,016 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 7 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,018 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=13, Invalid=29, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=42 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,018 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 129 states and 285 transitions. Second operand 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,233 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,234 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 200 states and 441 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,234 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 6 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,234 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 7 states. Word has length 15 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,235 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,236 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 200 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,236 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 125 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,236 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 7 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 7 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 5 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.0s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=23, Invalid=49, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=72 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,237 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 125 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,240 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 125 to 125. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,240 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 125 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,241 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 125 states to 125 states and 271 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,241 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 125 states and 271 transitions. Word has length 15 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,241 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,241 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 125 states and 271 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,241 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,241 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 125 states and 271 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,242 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. Found accepting run of length 16 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,242 INFO L414 BasicCegarLoop]: Found error trace [2021-10-11 02:22:51,242 INFO L422 BasicCegarLoop]: trace histogram [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] [2021-10-11 02:22:51,242 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable7 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,242 INFO L429 AbstractCegarLoop]: === Iteration 9 === [ULTIMATE.startErr1INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0INUSE_VIOLATION, ULTIMATE.startErr0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION, P1Err0ASSERT_VIOLATIONERROR_FUNCTION]=== [2021-10-11 02:22:51,242 INFO L144 PredicateUnifier]: Initialized classic predicate unifier [2021-10-11 02:22:51,243 INFO L82 PathProgramCache]: Analyzing trace with hash -2078422308, now seen corresponding path program 2 times [2021-10-11 02:22:51,243 INFO L162 FreeRefinementEngine]: Executing refinement strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:51,244 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using trace check IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [98140946] [2021-10-11 02:22:51,245 INFO L95 rtionOrderModulation]: Keeping assertion order NOT_INCREMENTALLY [2021-10-11 02:22:51,368 INFO L136 AnnotateAndAsserter]: Conjunction of SSA is unsat [2021-10-11 02:22:51,712 INFO L134 CoverageAnalysis]: Checked inductivity of 0 backedges. 0 proven. 0 refuted. 0 times theorem prover too weak. 0 trivial. 0 not checked. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,713 INFO L353 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant generator IpTcStrategyModuleSmtInterpolCraig [98140946] [2021-10-11 02:22:51,713 INFO L219 FreeRefinementEngine]: Constructing automaton from 1 perfect and 0 imperfect interpolant sequences. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,713 INFO L232 FreeRefinementEngine]: Number of different interpolants: perfect sequences [8] imperfect sequences [] total 8 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,713 INFO L155 tionRefinementEngine]: Using interpolant automaton builder IpAbStrategyModuleStraightlineAll [625283464] [2021-10-11 02:22:51,714 INFO L461 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states [2021-10-11 02:22:51,714 INFO L142 FreeRefinementEngine]: Using predicate unifier PredicateUnifier provided by strategy SIFA_TAIPAN [2021-10-11 02:22:51,714 INFO L142 InterpolantAutomaton]: Constructing interpolant automaton starting with 10 interpolants. [2021-10-11 02:22:51,714 INFO L144 InterpolantAutomaton]: CoverageRelationStatistics Valid=24, Invalid=66, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=90 [2021-10-11 02:22:51,714 INFO L87 Difference]: Start difference. First operand 125 states and 271 transitions. Second operand 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,060 INFO L144 Difference]: Subtrahend was deterministic. Have not used determinization. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,060 INFO L93 Difference]: Finished difference Result 117 states and 253 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,061 INFO L141 InterpolantAutomaton]: Switched to read-only mode: deterministic interpolant automaton has 7 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,061 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 10 states. Word has length 15 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,061 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. some prefix is accepted. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,062 INFO L225 Difference]: With dead ends: 117 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,062 INFO L226 Difference]: Without dead ends: 0 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,062 INFO L677 BasicCegarLoop]: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 9 GetRequests, 0 SyntacticMatches, 0 SemanticMatches, 9 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 12 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 0.2s TimeCoverageRelationStatistics Valid=28, Invalid=82, Unknown=0, NotChecked=0, Total=110 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,062 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start minimizeSevpa. Operand 0 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,062 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished minimizeSevpa. Reduced states from 0 to 0. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,062 INFO L82 GeneralOperation]: Start removeUnreachable. Operand 0 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,062 INFO L88 GeneralOperation]: Finished removeUnreachable. Reduced from 0 states to 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,063 INFO L78 Accepts]: Start accepts. Automaton has 0 states and 0 transitions. Word has length 15 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,063 INFO L84 Accepts]: Finished accepts. word is rejected. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,063 INFO L481 AbstractCegarLoop]: Abstraction has 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,063 INFO L482 AbstractCegarLoop]: Interpolant automaton has 10 states. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,063 INFO L276 IsEmpty]: Start isEmpty. Operand 0 states and 0 transitions. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,063 INFO L282 IsEmpty]: Finished isEmpty. No accepting run. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,063 WARN L518 AbstractCegarLoop]: Destroyed unattended storables created during the last iteration: SelfDestructingSolverStorable8 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,066 INFO L202 PluginConnector]: Adding new model de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction CFG 11.10 02:22:52 BasicIcfg [2021-10-11 02:22:52,066 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END TraceAbstraction---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:52,067 INFO L113 PluginConnector]: ------------------------Witness Printer---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:52,067 INFO L271 PluginConnector]: Initializing Witness Printer... [2021-10-11 02:22:52,067 INFO L275 PluginConnector]: Witness Printer initialized [2021-10-11 02:22:52,071 INFO L185 PluginConnector]: Executing the observer RCFGCatcher from plugin Witness Printer for "de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.rcfgbuilder CFG 11.10 02:22:29" (3/4) ... [2021-10-11 02:22:52,073 INFO L137 WitnessPrinter]: Generating witness for correct program [2021-10-11 02:22:52,085 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P0 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,085 INFO L354 RCFGBacktranslator]: Ignoring RootEdge to procedure P1 [2021-10-11 02:22:52,104 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 110 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:22:52,104 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 29 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:22:52,105 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 5 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:22:52,105 INFO L910 BoogieBacktranslator]: Reduced CFG by removing 1 nodes and edges [2021-10-11 02:22:52,181 INFO L141 WitnessManager]: Wrote witness to /tmp/vcloud_worker_vcloud-master_on_vcloud-master/run_dir_9952f3bd-37d7-4592-a39b-c9f4d1f34d92/bin/utaipan-WLngWcDbfI/witness.graphml [2021-10-11 02:22:52,183 INFO L132 PluginConnector]: ------------------------ END Witness Printer---------------------------- [2021-10-11 02:22:52,184 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Toolchain (without parser) took 28414.39 ms. Allocated memory was 111.1 MB in the beginning and 398.5 MB in the end (delta: 287.3 MB). Free memory was 73.9 MB in the beginning and 234.5 MB in the end (delta: -160.6 MB). Peak memory consumption was 126.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,185 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CDTParser took 0.37 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 86.9 MB in the beginning and 86.9 MB in the end (delta: 21.3 kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,185 INFO L168 Benchmark]: CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 814.65 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 73.6 MB in the beginning and 59.4 MB in the end (delta: 14.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,185 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Procedure Inliner took 93.72 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 59.4 MB in the beginning and 56.1 MB in the end (delta: 3.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,186 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Boogie Preprocessor took 62.33 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 56.1 MB in the beginning and 53.2 MB in the end (delta: 2.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,186 INFO L168 Benchmark]: RCFGBuilder took 4404.55 ms. Allocated memory was 111.1 MB in the beginning and 182.5 MB in the end (delta: 71.3 MB). Free memory was 53.2 MB in the beginning and 139.5 MB in the end (delta: -86.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 68.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,187 INFO L168 Benchmark]: TraceAbstraction took 22914.78 ms. Allocated memory was 182.5 MB in the beginning and 398.5 MB in the end (delta: 216.0 MB). Free memory was 139.5 MB in the beginning and 242.9 MB in the end (delta: -103.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 112.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,187 INFO L168 Benchmark]: Witness Printer took 116.82 ms. Allocated memory is still 398.5 MB. Free memory was 242.9 MB in the beginning and 234.5 MB in the end (delta: 8.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 8.4 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. [2021-10-11 02:22:52,190 INFO L339 ainManager$Toolchain]: ####################### End [Toolchain 1] ####################### --- Results --- * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.core: - StatisticsResult: Toolchain Benchmarks Benchmark results are: * CDTParser took 0.37 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 86.9 MB in the beginning and 86.9 MB in the end (delta: 21.3 kB). There was no memory consumed. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * CACSL2BoogieTranslator took 814.65 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 73.6 MB in the beginning and 59.4 MB in the end (delta: 14.1 MB). Peak memory consumption was 14.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Procedure Inliner took 93.72 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 59.4 MB in the beginning and 56.1 MB in the end (delta: 3.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 2.1 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Boogie Preprocessor took 62.33 ms. Allocated memory is still 111.1 MB. Free memory was 56.1 MB in the beginning and 53.2 MB in the end (delta: 2.9 MB). Peak memory consumption was 4.2 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * RCFGBuilder took 4404.55 ms. Allocated memory was 111.1 MB in the beginning and 182.5 MB in the end (delta: 71.3 MB). Free memory was 53.2 MB in the beginning and 139.5 MB in the end (delta: -86.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 68.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * TraceAbstraction took 22914.78 ms. Allocated memory was 182.5 MB in the beginning and 398.5 MB in the end (delta: 216.0 MB). Free memory was 139.5 MB in the beginning and 242.9 MB in the end (delta: -103.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 112.7 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Witness Printer took 116.82 ms. Allocated memory is still 398.5 MB. Free memory was 242.9 MB in the beginning and 234.5 MB in the end (delta: 8.4 MB). Peak memory consumption was 8.4 MB. Max. memory is 16.1 GB. * Results from de.uni_freiburg.informatik.ultimate.plugins.generator.traceabstraction: - StatisticsResult: PetriNetLargeBlockEncoding benchmarks 688 VarBasedMoverChecksPositive, 68 VarBasedMoverChecksNegative, 29 SemBasedMoverChecksPositive, 39 SemBasedMoverChecksNegative, 0 SemBasedMoverChecksUnknown, SemBasedMoverCheckTime: 4.0s, 84 CheckedPairsTotal, LiptonReductionStatistics: ReductionTime: 17.9s, 90 PlacesBefore, 29 PlacesAfterwards, 85 TransitionsBefore, 23 TransitionsAfterwards, 1124 CoEnabledTransitionPairs, 7 FixpointIterations, 34 TrivialSequentialCompositions, 33 ConcurrentSequentialCompositions, 0 TrivialYvCompositions, 7 ConcurrentYvCompositions, 1 ChoiceCompositions, 75 TotalNumberOfCompositions, 3210 MoverChecksTotal - PositiveResult [Line: 19]: call to reach_error is unreachable For all program executions holds that call to reach_error is unreachable at this location - PositiveResult [Line: 19]: call to reach_error is unreachable For all program executions holds that call to reach_error is unreachable at this location - AllSpecificationsHoldResult: All specifications hold 2 specifications checked. All of them hold - StatisticsResult: Ultimate Automizer benchmark data CFG has 3 procedures, 84 locations, 2 error locations. Started 1 CEGAR loops. VerificationResult: SAFE, OverallTime: 22.6s, OverallIterations: 9, TraceHistogramMax: 1, AutomataDifference: 1.8s, DeadEndRemovalTime: 0.0s, HoareAnnotationTime: 0.0s, InitialAbstractionConstructionTime: 18.0s, HoareTripleCheckerStatistics: 176 SDtfs, 190 SDslu, 352 SDs, 0 SdLazy, 475 SolverSat, 113 SolverUnsat, 0 SolverUnknown, 0 SolverNotchecked, 1.0s Time, PredicateUnifierStatistics: 0 DeclaredPredicates, 61 GetRequests, 2 SyntacticMatches, 1 SemanticMatches, 58 ConstructedPredicates, 0 IntricatePredicates, 0 DeprecatedPredicates, 59 ImplicationChecksByTransitivity, 1.0s Time, 0.0s BasicInterpolantAutomatonTime, BiggestAbstraction: size=266occurred in iteration=0, traceCheckStatistics: No data available, InterpolantConsolidationStatistics: No data available, PathInvariantsStatistics: No data available, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, TotalInterpolationStatistics: No data available, 0.0s DumpTime, AutomataMinimizationStatistics: 0.1s AutomataMinimizationTime, 9 MinimizatonAttempts, 45 StatesRemovedByMinimization, 4 NontrivialMinimizations, HoareAnnotationStatistics: No data available, RefinementEngineStatistics: TRACE_CHECK: 0.0s SsaConstructionTime, 0.8s SatisfiabilityAnalysisTime, 1.5s InterpolantComputationTime, 107 NumberOfCodeBlocks, 107 NumberOfCodeBlocksAsserted, 9 NumberOfCheckSat, 98 ConstructedInterpolants, 0 QuantifiedInterpolants, 12326 SizeOfPredicates, 0 NumberOfNonLiveVariables, 0 ConjunctsInSsa, 0 ConjunctsInUnsatCore, 9 InterpolantComputations, 9 PerfectInterpolantSequences, 0/0 InterpolantCoveringCapability, INVARIANT_SYNTHESIS: No data available, INTERPOLANT_CONSOLIDATION: No data available, ABSTRACT_INTERPRETATION: No data available, PDR: No data available, ACCELERATED_INTERPOLATION: No data available, SIFA: No data available, ReuseStatistics: No data available RESULT: Ultimate proved your program to be correct! Received shutdown request...